Cargando…

Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid shift to digital strategies including e-exams in medical schools. However, there are significant concerns, predominately from student perspectives, and further data is required to successfully establish e-assessment in the medical curricula. The objective of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziehfreund, Stefanie, Reifenrath, Johannes, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, Welzel, Julia, Sauter, Fabian, Wecker, Hannah, Biedermann, Tilo, Zink, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2114131
_version_ 1784772127523602432
author Ziehfreund, Stefanie
Reifenrath, Johannes
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Welzel, Julia
Sauter, Fabian
Wecker, Hannah
Biedermann, Tilo
Zink, Alexander
author_facet Ziehfreund, Stefanie
Reifenrath, Johannes
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Welzel, Julia
Sauter, Fabian
Wecker, Hannah
Biedermann, Tilo
Zink, Alexander
author_sort Ziehfreund, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid shift to digital strategies including e-exams in medical schools. However, there are significant concerns, predominately from student perspectives, and further data is required to successfully establish e-assessment in the medical curricula. The objective of the study was to examine medical students’ perceptions, concerns, and needs regarding e-assessment to establish a comprehensive e-exam based on these and previous findings and to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of examinee perceptions and further needs. During the 2021 summer term, a cross-sectional study using qualitative and quantitative methods was conducted among all 1077 students at the School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich. They were asked to provide information regarding their characteristics, preferred exam format, e-assessment perception, concerns, and needs in an online questionnaire. Based on these findings, a pilot e-exam including an e-exam preparation for the students were established and subsequently evaluated among 125 pilot e-exam examinees under study consideration via an online-questionnaire. Of the 317 pre-exam participants (73.2% female), 70.3% preferred in-person exams and showed concerns about the technological framework, privacy, and examination requirements. Qualitative analysis showed that these concerns lead to additional exam stress and fear of failure. The 34 (79.4% female) participants who participated in the evaluation survey showed a significantly more positive e-exam perception. The fairness of the platform, the independence from an internet connection, the organization including the e-exam preparation, and the consideration of participant needs were discussed as particularly positive in the open-ended comments. In both surveys, participants requested uniform platforms and processes for all subjects. This study provides evidence for a positive, complementary role of student participation in a successful e-exam implementation. Furthermore, when establishing an e-exam format in the medical curricula, e-exam training, equal accessibility, availability offline, and all-round fairness should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9397442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93974422022-08-24 Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams Ziehfreund, Stefanie Reifenrath, Johannes Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Welzel, Julia Sauter, Fabian Wecker, Hannah Biedermann, Tilo Zink, Alexander Med Educ Online Research Article The COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid shift to digital strategies including e-exams in medical schools. However, there are significant concerns, predominately from student perspectives, and further data is required to successfully establish e-assessment in the medical curricula. The objective of the study was to examine medical students’ perceptions, concerns, and needs regarding e-assessment to establish a comprehensive e-exam based on these and previous findings and to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of examinee perceptions and further needs. During the 2021 summer term, a cross-sectional study using qualitative and quantitative methods was conducted among all 1077 students at the School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich. They were asked to provide information regarding their characteristics, preferred exam format, e-assessment perception, concerns, and needs in an online questionnaire. Based on these findings, a pilot e-exam including an e-exam preparation for the students were established and subsequently evaluated among 125 pilot e-exam examinees under study consideration via an online-questionnaire. Of the 317 pre-exam participants (73.2% female), 70.3% preferred in-person exams and showed concerns about the technological framework, privacy, and examination requirements. Qualitative analysis showed that these concerns lead to additional exam stress and fear of failure. The 34 (79.4% female) participants who participated in the evaluation survey showed a significantly more positive e-exam perception. The fairness of the platform, the independence from an internet connection, the organization including the e-exam preparation, and the consideration of participant needs were discussed as particularly positive in the open-ended comments. In both surveys, participants requested uniform platforms and processes for all subjects. This study provides evidence for a positive, complementary role of student participation in a successful e-exam implementation. Furthermore, when establishing an e-exam format in the medical curricula, e-exam training, equal accessibility, availability offline, and all-round fairness should be considered. Taylor & Francis 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9397442/ /pubmed/35993348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2114131 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ziehfreund, Stefanie
Reifenrath, Johannes
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Welzel, Julia
Sauter, Fabian
Wecker, Hannah
Biedermann, Tilo
Zink, Alexander
Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
title Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
title_full Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
title_fullStr Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
title_full_unstemmed Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
title_short Considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
title_sort considering medical students’ perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during covid-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2114131
work_keys_str_mv AT ziehfreundstefanie consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT reifenrathjohannes consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT wijnenmeijermarjo consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT welzeljulia consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT sauterfabian consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT weckerhannah consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT biedermanntilo consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams
AT zinkalexander consideringmedicalstudentsperceptionconcernsandneedsforeexamduringcovid19apromisingapproachtoimprovesubjectspecificeexams