Cargando…
Energy and exergy analysis of three leaved yam starch drying in a tray dryer: parametric, modelling and optimization studies
Engineering conservation during the drying process is paramount as it will help in the preservation and cost minimization of food products during processing to avoid spoilage and maximize their utilization in society. Unlike other yam species, three-leaved yam starch (TLYS) contains phytonutrients f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10124 |
Sumario: | Engineering conservation during the drying process is paramount as it will help in the preservation and cost minimization of food products during processing to avoid spoilage and maximize their utilization in society. Unlike other yam species, three-leaved yam starch (TLYS) contains phytonutrients for the treatment of ailments such as diabetes and rheumatism. This work examined the energy and exergy of TLYS drying. The starch was extracted from the tuber and dried while the temperature, time, air velocity, and sample thickness were varied. TLYS proximate and SEM analysis revealed a significant amount of starch. Energy analysis revealed that energy utilization (EU) and energy utilization ratio (EUR) increased as the temperature rose and decreased as drying time increased; energy efficiency (EE) increased steadily and then reduced as drying time increased. Exergy analysis revealed that drying temperature increased exergetic efficiency and loss; drying time increased exergetic efficiency from 30 min to 4 h. The highest exergy loss was observed when the sample was dried for 4 h and the thickness is 17 mm; as the thickness decreased to 12.75 mm, the exergy loss decreased from 2.471392 J/s to 1.459247 J/s; the highest exergy efficiency of 2.471392 J/s was observed at the thickness of 4.25 mm, and the sustainability index increased as the sample thickness increased and decreased as the drying air temperature decreased. Response surface methodology (RSM) was utilized to model and optimize the effect of the process’s inherent operating factors (temperature, time, and air velocity) and maximize the process’s energy and exergy efficiency. The (Analysis of Variance) ANOVA revealed a second-order polynomial model with an R(2) (0.9911), Adj R(2) (0.9797) and Pred R(2) (0.8577) for energy efficiency and R(2) (0.9824), Adj R(2) (0.9598), and Pred R(2) (0.7184) for exergy efficiency, indicating a significant correlation between observed and predicted values. At a temperature of 60 °C, a time of 3 h, and an air velocity of 1.5 m/s, the optimal energy efficiency of 75.09 % and exergy efficiency of 99.221% were obtained with desirability of 0.997. The findings of this study can be used to improve the design and development of driers for TLYS preservation. |
---|