Cargando…

Physical characteristics comparison between maytansinoid-based and auristatin-based antibody-drug conjugates

AIM: Direct analytical comparison of two major drug-linkers in the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) field was conducted. METHODS: Four different analytical methods [AlogP calculation, reverse phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; RP-HPLC), size exclusion chromatography HPLC (SEC-HPLC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujii, Tomohiro, Reiling, Calliste, Quinn, Colette, Kliman, Michal, Mendelsohn, Brian A., Matsuda, Yutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Exploration 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36046112
http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00064
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: Direct analytical comparison of two major drug-linkers in the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) field was conducted. METHODS: Four different analytical methods [AlogP calculation, reverse phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; RP-HPLC), size exclusion chromatography HPLC (SEC-HPLC), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)] were tested for this comparison. RESULTS: Maytansinoid-based ADCs showed less hydrophobicity than auristatin-based ADCs. Regardless of the drug-linker and drug-to-antibody ratios (DARs), the stability detected by DSC was decreased by conjugation. CONCLUSIONS: The cost and time-efficient analytical comparison described in this manuscript may be useful information for an initial characterization of ADCs prior to detailed biological studies.