Cargando…

A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases

Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling is a useful method for investigating drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The most commonly used mathematical models in PK modeling are the compartment model and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Although the theoretical characteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryu, Hyo-jeong, Kang, Won-ho, Kim, Taeheon, Kim, Jae Kyoung, Shin, Kwang-Hee, Chae, Jung-woo, Yun, Hwi-yeol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.964049
_version_ 1784775684260888576
author Ryu, Hyo-jeong
Kang, Won-ho
Kim, Taeheon
Kim, Jae Kyoung
Shin, Kwang-Hee
Chae, Jung-woo
Yun, Hwi-yeol
author_facet Ryu, Hyo-jeong
Kang, Won-ho
Kim, Taeheon
Kim, Jae Kyoung
Shin, Kwang-Hee
Chae, Jung-woo
Yun, Hwi-yeol
author_sort Ryu, Hyo-jeong
collection PubMed
description Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling is a useful method for investigating drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The most commonly used mathematical models in PK modeling are the compartment model and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Although the theoretical characteristics of each model are well known, there have been few comparative studies of the compatibility of the models. Therefore, we evaluated the compatibility of PBPK and compartment models using the lumping method with 20 model compounds. The PBPK model was theoretically reduced to the lumped model using the principle of grouping tissues and organs that show similar kinetic behaviors. The area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) based on the simulated concentration and PK parameters (drug clearance [CL], central volume of distribution [Vc], peripheral volume of distribution [Vp]) in each model were compared, assuming administration to humans. The AUC and PK parameters in the PBPK model were similar to those in the lumped model within the 2-fold range for 17 of 20 model compounds (85%). In addition, the relationship of the calculated Vd/fu (volume of distribution [Vd], drug-unbound fraction [fu]) and the accuracy of AUC between the lumped model and compartment model confirmed their compatibility. Accordingly, the compatibility between PBPK and compartment models was confirmed by the lumping method. This method can be applied depending on the requirement of compatibility between the two models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9413202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94132022022-08-27 A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases Ryu, Hyo-jeong Kang, Won-ho Kim, Taeheon Kim, Jae Kyoung Shin, Kwang-Hee Chae, Jung-woo Yun, Hwi-yeol Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling is a useful method for investigating drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The most commonly used mathematical models in PK modeling are the compartment model and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Although the theoretical characteristics of each model are well known, there have been few comparative studies of the compatibility of the models. Therefore, we evaluated the compatibility of PBPK and compartment models using the lumping method with 20 model compounds. The PBPK model was theoretically reduced to the lumped model using the principle of grouping tissues and organs that show similar kinetic behaviors. The area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) based on the simulated concentration and PK parameters (drug clearance [CL], central volume of distribution [Vc], peripheral volume of distribution [Vp]) in each model were compared, assuming administration to humans. The AUC and PK parameters in the PBPK model were similar to those in the lumped model within the 2-fold range for 17 of 20 model compounds (85%). In addition, the relationship of the calculated Vd/fu (volume of distribution [Vd], drug-unbound fraction [fu]) and the accuracy of AUC between the lumped model and compartment model confirmed their compatibility. Accordingly, the compatibility between PBPK and compartment models was confirmed by the lumping method. This method can be applied depending on the requirement of compatibility between the two models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9413202/ /pubmed/36034786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.964049 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ryu, Kang, Kim, Kim, Shin, Chae and Yun. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Ryu, Hyo-jeong
Kang, Won-ho
Kim, Taeheon
Kim, Jae Kyoung
Shin, Kwang-Hee
Chae, Jung-woo
Yun, Hwi-yeol
A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases
title A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases
title_full A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases
title_fullStr A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases
title_full_unstemmed A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases
title_short A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases
title_sort compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (pbpk) model and the compartmental pk model using the lumping method with real cases
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.964049
work_keys_str_mv AT ryuhyojeong acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT kangwonho acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT kimtaeheon acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT kimjaekyoung acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT shinkwanghee acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT chaejungwoo acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT yunhwiyeol acompatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT ryuhyojeong compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT kangwonho compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT kimtaeheon compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT kimjaekyoung compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT shinkwanghee compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT chaejungwoo compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases
AT yunhwiyeol compatibilityevaluationbetweenthephysiologicallybasedpharmacokineticpbpkmodelandthecompartmentalpkmodelusingthelumpingmethodwithrealcases