Cargando…
Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
BACKGROUND: To date, few data on the quality and quantity of online physical education (P.E.) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. We assessed activity in online classes and reported allocated curriculum time for P.E. in a multi-national sample of European children (6–18 years). METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac082 |
_version_ | 1784777587434717184 |
---|---|
author | Kovacs, Viktoria A Csanyi, Tamas Blagus, Rok Brandes, Mirko Starc, Gregor Rocha, Paulo Scheuer, Claude Okely, Anthony D |
author_facet | Kovacs, Viktoria A Csanyi, Tamas Blagus, Rok Brandes, Mirko Starc, Gregor Rocha, Paulo Scheuer, Claude Okely, Anthony D |
author_sort | Kovacs, Viktoria A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, few data on the quality and quantity of online physical education (P.E.) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. We assessed activity in online classes and reported allocated curriculum time for P.E. in a multi-national sample of European children (6–18 years). METHODS: Data from two online surveys were analysed. A total of 8395 children were included in the first round (May–June 2020) and 24 302 in the second round (January–February 2021). RESULTS: Activity levels during P.E. classes were low in spring 2020, particularly among the youngest children and in certain countries. 27.9% of students did not do any online P.E. and 15.7% were hardly ever very active. Only 18.4% were always very active and 14.9% reported being very active quite often. In winter 2020, we observed a large variability in the allocated curriculum time for P.E. In many countries, this was lower than the compulsory requirements. Only 65.7% of respondents had the same number of P.E. lessons than before pandemic, while 23.8% had less P.E., and 6.8% claimed to have no P.E. lessons. Rates for no P.E. were especially high among secondary school students, and in large cities and megapolises. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, European children were provided much less P.E. in quantity and quality than before the pandemic. Countermeasures are needed to ensure that these changes do not become permanent. Particular attention is needed in large cities and megapolises. The critical role of P.E. for students’ health and development must be strengthened in the school system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9421408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94214082022-08-29 Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education? Kovacs, Viktoria A Csanyi, Tamas Blagus, Rok Brandes, Mirko Starc, Gregor Rocha, Paulo Scheuer, Claude Okely, Anthony D Eur J Public Health Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: To date, few data on the quality and quantity of online physical education (P.E.) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. We assessed activity in online classes and reported allocated curriculum time for P.E. in a multi-national sample of European children (6–18 years). METHODS: Data from two online surveys were analysed. A total of 8395 children were included in the first round (May–June 2020) and 24 302 in the second round (January–February 2021). RESULTS: Activity levels during P.E. classes were low in spring 2020, particularly among the youngest children and in certain countries. 27.9% of students did not do any online P.E. and 15.7% were hardly ever very active. Only 18.4% were always very active and 14.9% reported being very active quite often. In winter 2020, we observed a large variability in the allocated curriculum time for P.E. In many countries, this was lower than the compulsory requirements. Only 65.7% of respondents had the same number of P.E. lessons than before pandemic, while 23.8% had less P.E., and 6.8% claimed to have no P.E. lessons. Rates for no P.E. were especially high among secondary school students, and in large cities and megapolises. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, European children were provided much less P.E. in quantity and quality than before the pandemic. Countermeasures are needed to ensure that these changes do not become permanent. Particular attention is needed in large cities and megapolises. The critical role of P.E. for students’ health and development must be strengthened in the school system. Oxford University Press 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9421408/ /pubmed/36031817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac082 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Papers Kovacs, Viktoria A Csanyi, Tamas Blagus, Rok Brandes, Mirko Starc, Gregor Rocha, Paulo Scheuer, Claude Okely, Anthony D Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education? |
title | Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical
education? |
title_full | Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical
education? |
title_fullStr | Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical
education? |
title_full_unstemmed | Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical
education? |
title_short | Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical
education? |
title_sort | ringing the bell for quality p.e.: what are the realities of remote physical
education? |
topic | Supplement Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kovacsviktoriaa ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT csanyitamas ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT blagusrok ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT brandesmirko ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT starcgregor ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT rochapaulo ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT scheuerclaude ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation AT okelyanthonyd ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation |