Cargando…

Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?

BACKGROUND: To date, few data on the quality and quantity of online physical education (P.E.) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. We assessed activity in online classes and reported allocated curriculum time for P.E. in a multi-national sample of European children (6–18 years). METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovacs, Viktoria A, Csanyi, Tamas, Blagus, Rok, Brandes, Mirko, Starc, Gregor, Rocha, Paulo, Scheuer, Claude, Okely, Anthony D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac082
_version_ 1784777587434717184
author Kovacs, Viktoria A
Csanyi, Tamas
Blagus, Rok
Brandes, Mirko
Starc, Gregor
Rocha, Paulo
Scheuer, Claude
Okely, Anthony D
author_facet Kovacs, Viktoria A
Csanyi, Tamas
Blagus, Rok
Brandes, Mirko
Starc, Gregor
Rocha, Paulo
Scheuer, Claude
Okely, Anthony D
author_sort Kovacs, Viktoria A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, few data on the quality and quantity of online physical education (P.E.) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. We assessed activity in online classes and reported allocated curriculum time for P.E. in a multi-national sample of European children (6–18 years). METHODS: Data from two online surveys were analysed. A total of 8395 children were included in the first round (May–June 2020) and 24 302 in the second round (January–February 2021). RESULTS: Activity levels during P.E. classes were low in spring 2020, particularly among the youngest children and in certain countries. 27.9% of students did not do any online P.E. and 15.7% were hardly ever very active. Only 18.4% were always very active and 14.9% reported being very active quite often. In winter 2020, we observed a large variability in the allocated curriculum time for P.E. In many countries, this was lower than the compulsory requirements. Only 65.7% of respondents had the same number of P.E. lessons than before pandemic, while 23.8% had less P.E., and 6.8% claimed to have no P.E. lessons. Rates for no P.E. were especially high among secondary school students, and in large cities and megapolises. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, European children were provided much less P.E. in quantity and quality than before the pandemic. Countermeasures are needed to ensure that these changes do not become permanent. Particular attention is needed in large cities and megapolises. The critical role of P.E. for students’ health and development must be strengthened in the school system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9421408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94214082022-08-29 Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education? Kovacs, Viktoria A Csanyi, Tamas Blagus, Rok Brandes, Mirko Starc, Gregor Rocha, Paulo Scheuer, Claude Okely, Anthony D Eur J Public Health Supplement Papers BACKGROUND: To date, few data on the quality and quantity of online physical education (P.E.) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published. We assessed activity in online classes and reported allocated curriculum time for P.E. in a multi-national sample of European children (6–18 years). METHODS: Data from two online surveys were analysed. A total of 8395 children were included in the first round (May–June 2020) and 24 302 in the second round (January–February 2021). RESULTS: Activity levels during P.E. classes were low in spring 2020, particularly among the youngest children and in certain countries. 27.9% of students did not do any online P.E. and 15.7% were hardly ever very active. Only 18.4% were always very active and 14.9% reported being very active quite often. In winter 2020, we observed a large variability in the allocated curriculum time for P.E. In many countries, this was lower than the compulsory requirements. Only 65.7% of respondents had the same number of P.E. lessons than before pandemic, while 23.8% had less P.E., and 6.8% claimed to have no P.E. lessons. Rates for no P.E. were especially high among secondary school students, and in large cities and megapolises. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, European children were provided much less P.E. in quantity and quality than before the pandemic. Countermeasures are needed to ensure that these changes do not become permanent. Particular attention is needed in large cities and megapolises. The critical role of P.E. for students’ health and development must be strengthened in the school system. Oxford University Press 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9421408/ /pubmed/36031817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac082 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Papers
Kovacs, Viktoria A
Csanyi, Tamas
Blagus, Rok
Brandes, Mirko
Starc, Gregor
Rocha, Paulo
Scheuer, Claude
Okely, Anthony D
Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
title Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
title_full Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
title_fullStr Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
title_full_unstemmed Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
title_short Ringing the bell for quality P.E.: What are the realities of remote physical education?
title_sort ringing the bell for quality p.e.: what are the realities of remote physical education?
topic Supplement Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac082
work_keys_str_mv AT kovacsviktoriaa ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT csanyitamas ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT blagusrok ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT brandesmirko ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT starcgregor ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT rochapaulo ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT scheuerclaude ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation
AT okelyanthonyd ringingthebellforqualitypewhataretherealitiesofremotephysicaleducation