Cargando…

A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome

BACKGROUND: Central conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common subtype of primary malignant bone tumour in adults. Treatment options are usually limited to surgery, and prognosis is challenging. These tumours are characterised by the presence and absence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cross, William, Lyskjær, Iben, Lesluyes, Tom, Hargreaves, Steven, Strobl, Anna-Christina, Davies, Christopher, Waise, Sara, Hames-Fathi, Shadi, Oukrif, Dahmane, Ye, Hongtao, Amary, Fernanda, Tirabosco, Roberto, Gerrand, Craig, Baker, Toby, Barnes, David, Steele, Christopher, Alexandrov, Ludmil, Bond, Gareth, Cool, Paul, Pillay, Nischalan, Loo, Peter Van, Flanagan, Adrienne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0
_version_ 1784778592230572032
author Cross, William
Lyskjær, Iben
Lesluyes, Tom
Hargreaves, Steven
Strobl, Anna-Christina
Davies, Christopher
Waise, Sara
Hames-Fathi, Shadi
Oukrif, Dahmane
Ye, Hongtao
Amary, Fernanda
Tirabosco, Roberto
Gerrand, Craig
Baker, Toby
Barnes, David
Steele, Christopher
Alexandrov, Ludmil
Bond, Gareth
Cool, Paul
Pillay, Nischalan
Loo, Peter Van
Flanagan, Adrienne M.
author_facet Cross, William
Lyskjær, Iben
Lesluyes, Tom
Hargreaves, Steven
Strobl, Anna-Christina
Davies, Christopher
Waise, Sara
Hames-Fathi, Shadi
Oukrif, Dahmane
Ye, Hongtao
Amary, Fernanda
Tirabosco, Roberto
Gerrand, Craig
Baker, Toby
Barnes, David
Steele, Christopher
Alexandrov, Ludmil
Bond, Gareth
Cool, Paul
Pillay, Nischalan
Loo, Peter Van
Flanagan, Adrienne M.
author_sort Cross, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common subtype of primary malignant bone tumour in adults. Treatment options are usually limited to surgery, and prognosis is challenging. These tumours are characterised by the presence and absence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and recently, TERT promoter alterations have been reported in around 20% of cases. The effect of these mutations on clinical outcome remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if prognostic accuracy can be improved by the addition of genomic data, and specifically by examination of IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations. METHODS: In this study, we combined both archival samples and data sourced from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project (n = 356). Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and TERT were profiled using digital droplet PCR (n = 346), whole genome sequencing (n=68), or both (n = 64). Complex events and other genetic features were also examined, along with methylation array data (n = 84). We correlated clinical features and patient outcomes with our genetic findings. RESULTS: IDH2-mutant tumours occur in older patients and commonly present with high-grade or dedifferentiated disease. Notably, TERT mutations occur most frequently in IDH2-mutant tumours, although have no effect on survival in this group. In contrast, TERT mutations are rarer in IDH1-mutant tumours, yet they are associated with a less favourable outcome in this group. We also found that methylation profiles distinguish IDH1- from IDH2-mutant tumours. IDH wild-type tumours rarely exhibit TERT mutations and tend to be diagnosed in a younger population than those with tumours harbouring IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. A major genetic feature of this group is haploidisation and subsequent genome doubling. These tumours evolve less frequently to dedifferentiated disease and therefore constitute a lower risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumours with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations or those that are IDHwt have significantly different genetic pathways and outcomes in relation to TERT mutation. Diagnostic testing for IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations could therefore help to guide clinical monitoring and prognostication. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9426036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94260362022-08-31 A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome Cross, William Lyskjær, Iben Lesluyes, Tom Hargreaves, Steven Strobl, Anna-Christina Davies, Christopher Waise, Sara Hames-Fathi, Shadi Oukrif, Dahmane Ye, Hongtao Amary, Fernanda Tirabosco, Roberto Gerrand, Craig Baker, Toby Barnes, David Steele, Christopher Alexandrov, Ludmil Bond, Gareth Cool, Paul Pillay, Nischalan Loo, Peter Van Flanagan, Adrienne M. Genome Med Research BACKGROUND: Central conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common subtype of primary malignant bone tumour in adults. Treatment options are usually limited to surgery, and prognosis is challenging. These tumours are characterised by the presence and absence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and recently, TERT promoter alterations have been reported in around 20% of cases. The effect of these mutations on clinical outcome remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if prognostic accuracy can be improved by the addition of genomic data, and specifically by examination of IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations. METHODS: In this study, we combined both archival samples and data sourced from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project (n = 356). Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and TERT were profiled using digital droplet PCR (n = 346), whole genome sequencing (n=68), or both (n = 64). Complex events and other genetic features were also examined, along with methylation array data (n = 84). We correlated clinical features and patient outcomes with our genetic findings. RESULTS: IDH2-mutant tumours occur in older patients and commonly present with high-grade or dedifferentiated disease. Notably, TERT mutations occur most frequently in IDH2-mutant tumours, although have no effect on survival in this group. In contrast, TERT mutations are rarer in IDH1-mutant tumours, yet they are associated with a less favourable outcome in this group. We also found that methylation profiles distinguish IDH1- from IDH2-mutant tumours. IDH wild-type tumours rarely exhibit TERT mutations and tend to be diagnosed in a younger population than those with tumours harbouring IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. A major genetic feature of this group is haploidisation and subsequent genome doubling. These tumours evolve less frequently to dedifferentiated disease and therefore constitute a lower risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumours with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations or those that are IDHwt have significantly different genetic pathways and outcomes in relation to TERT mutation. Diagnostic testing for IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations could therefore help to guide clinical monitoring and prognostication. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0. BioMed Central 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9426036/ /pubmed/36042521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cross, William
Lyskjær, Iben
Lesluyes, Tom
Hargreaves, Steven
Strobl, Anna-Christina
Davies, Christopher
Waise, Sara
Hames-Fathi, Shadi
Oukrif, Dahmane
Ye, Hongtao
Amary, Fernanda
Tirabosco, Roberto
Gerrand, Craig
Baker, Toby
Barnes, David
Steele, Christopher
Alexandrov, Ludmil
Bond, Gareth
Cool, Paul
Pillay, Nischalan
Loo, Peter Van
Flanagan, Adrienne M.
A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
title A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
title_full A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
title_fullStr A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
title_full_unstemmed A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
title_short A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
title_sort genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0
work_keys_str_mv AT crosswilliam ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT lyskjæriben ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT lesluyestom ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT hargreavessteven ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT stroblannachristina ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT davieschristopher ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT waisesara ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT hamesfathishadi ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT oukrifdahmane ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT yehongtao ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT amaryfernanda ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT tiraboscoroberto ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT gerrandcraig ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT bakertoby ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT barnesdavid ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT steelechristopher ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT alexandrovludmil ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT bondgareth ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT coolpaul ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT pillaynischalan ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT loopetervan ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT flanaganadriennem ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT crosswilliam geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT lyskjæriben geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT lesluyestom geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT hargreavessteven geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT stroblannachristina geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT davieschristopher geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT waisesara geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT hamesfathishadi geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT oukrifdahmane geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT yehongtao geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT amaryfernanda geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT tiraboscoroberto geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT gerrandcraig geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT bakertoby geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT barnesdavid geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT steelechristopher geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT alexandrovludmil geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT bondgareth geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT coolpaul geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT pillaynischalan geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT loopetervan geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome
AT flanaganadriennem geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome