Cargando…
A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome
BACKGROUND: Central conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common subtype of primary malignant bone tumour in adults. Treatment options are usually limited to surgery, and prognosis is challenging. These tumours are characterised by the presence and absence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and rece...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0 |
_version_ | 1784778592230572032 |
---|---|
author | Cross, William Lyskjær, Iben Lesluyes, Tom Hargreaves, Steven Strobl, Anna-Christina Davies, Christopher Waise, Sara Hames-Fathi, Shadi Oukrif, Dahmane Ye, Hongtao Amary, Fernanda Tirabosco, Roberto Gerrand, Craig Baker, Toby Barnes, David Steele, Christopher Alexandrov, Ludmil Bond, Gareth Cool, Paul Pillay, Nischalan Loo, Peter Van Flanagan, Adrienne M. |
author_facet | Cross, William Lyskjær, Iben Lesluyes, Tom Hargreaves, Steven Strobl, Anna-Christina Davies, Christopher Waise, Sara Hames-Fathi, Shadi Oukrif, Dahmane Ye, Hongtao Amary, Fernanda Tirabosco, Roberto Gerrand, Craig Baker, Toby Barnes, David Steele, Christopher Alexandrov, Ludmil Bond, Gareth Cool, Paul Pillay, Nischalan Loo, Peter Van Flanagan, Adrienne M. |
author_sort | Cross, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common subtype of primary malignant bone tumour in adults. Treatment options are usually limited to surgery, and prognosis is challenging. These tumours are characterised by the presence and absence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and recently, TERT promoter alterations have been reported in around 20% of cases. The effect of these mutations on clinical outcome remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if prognostic accuracy can be improved by the addition of genomic data, and specifically by examination of IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations. METHODS: In this study, we combined both archival samples and data sourced from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project (n = 356). Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and TERT were profiled using digital droplet PCR (n = 346), whole genome sequencing (n=68), or both (n = 64). Complex events and other genetic features were also examined, along with methylation array data (n = 84). We correlated clinical features and patient outcomes with our genetic findings. RESULTS: IDH2-mutant tumours occur in older patients and commonly present with high-grade or dedifferentiated disease. Notably, TERT mutations occur most frequently in IDH2-mutant tumours, although have no effect on survival in this group. In contrast, TERT mutations are rarer in IDH1-mutant tumours, yet they are associated with a less favourable outcome in this group. We also found that methylation profiles distinguish IDH1- from IDH2-mutant tumours. IDH wild-type tumours rarely exhibit TERT mutations and tend to be diagnosed in a younger population than those with tumours harbouring IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. A major genetic feature of this group is haploidisation and subsequent genome doubling. These tumours evolve less frequently to dedifferentiated disease and therefore constitute a lower risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumours with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations or those that are IDHwt have significantly different genetic pathways and outcomes in relation to TERT mutation. Diagnostic testing for IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations could therefore help to guide clinical monitoring and prognostication. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9426036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94260362022-08-31 A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome Cross, William Lyskjær, Iben Lesluyes, Tom Hargreaves, Steven Strobl, Anna-Christina Davies, Christopher Waise, Sara Hames-Fathi, Shadi Oukrif, Dahmane Ye, Hongtao Amary, Fernanda Tirabosco, Roberto Gerrand, Craig Baker, Toby Barnes, David Steele, Christopher Alexandrov, Ludmil Bond, Gareth Cool, Paul Pillay, Nischalan Loo, Peter Van Flanagan, Adrienne M. Genome Med Research BACKGROUND: Central conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) is the most common subtype of primary malignant bone tumour in adults. Treatment options are usually limited to surgery, and prognosis is challenging. These tumours are characterised by the presence and absence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and recently, TERT promoter alterations have been reported in around 20% of cases. The effect of these mutations on clinical outcome remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if prognostic accuracy can be improved by the addition of genomic data, and specifically by examination of IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations. METHODS: In this study, we combined both archival samples and data sourced from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project (n = 356). Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and TERT were profiled using digital droplet PCR (n = 346), whole genome sequencing (n=68), or both (n = 64). Complex events and other genetic features were also examined, along with methylation array data (n = 84). We correlated clinical features and patient outcomes with our genetic findings. RESULTS: IDH2-mutant tumours occur in older patients and commonly present with high-grade or dedifferentiated disease. Notably, TERT mutations occur most frequently in IDH2-mutant tumours, although have no effect on survival in this group. In contrast, TERT mutations are rarer in IDH1-mutant tumours, yet they are associated with a less favourable outcome in this group. We also found that methylation profiles distinguish IDH1- from IDH2-mutant tumours. IDH wild-type tumours rarely exhibit TERT mutations and tend to be diagnosed in a younger population than those with tumours harbouring IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. A major genetic feature of this group is haploidisation and subsequent genome doubling. These tumours evolve less frequently to dedifferentiated disease and therefore constitute a lower risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumours with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations or those that are IDHwt have significantly different genetic pathways and outcomes in relation to TERT mutation. Diagnostic testing for IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutations could therefore help to guide clinical monitoring and prognostication. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0. BioMed Central 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9426036/ /pubmed/36042521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Cross, William Lyskjær, Iben Lesluyes, Tom Hargreaves, Steven Strobl, Anna-Christina Davies, Christopher Waise, Sara Hames-Fathi, Shadi Oukrif, Dahmane Ye, Hongtao Amary, Fernanda Tirabosco, Roberto Gerrand, Craig Baker, Toby Barnes, David Steele, Christopher Alexandrov, Ludmil Bond, Gareth Cool, Paul Pillay, Nischalan Loo, Peter Van Flanagan, Adrienne M. A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
title | A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
title_full | A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
title_fullStr | A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
title_short | A genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
title_sort | genetic model for central chondrosarcoma evolution correlates with patient outcome |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01084-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crosswilliam ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT lyskjæriben ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT lesluyestom ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT hargreavessteven ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT stroblannachristina ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT davieschristopher ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT waisesara ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT hamesfathishadi ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT oukrifdahmane ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT yehongtao ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT amaryfernanda ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT tiraboscoroberto ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT gerrandcraig ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT bakertoby ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT barnesdavid ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT steelechristopher ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT alexandrovludmil ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT bondgareth ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT coolpaul ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT pillaynischalan ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT loopetervan ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT flanaganadriennem ageneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT crosswilliam geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT lyskjæriben geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT lesluyestom geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT hargreavessteven geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT stroblannachristina geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT davieschristopher geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT waisesara geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT hamesfathishadi geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT oukrifdahmane geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT yehongtao geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT amaryfernanda geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT tiraboscoroberto geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT gerrandcraig geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT bakertoby geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT barnesdavid geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT steelechristopher geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT alexandrovludmil geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT bondgareth geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT coolpaul geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT pillaynischalan geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT loopetervan geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome AT flanaganadriennem geneticmodelforcentralchondrosarcomaevolutioncorrelateswithpatientoutcome |