Cargando…

Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means

For decades now a research question has firmly established itself as a staple of psychological and neuroscientific investigations on language, namely the question of whether and how bilingualism is cognitively beneficial, detrimental or neutral. As more and more studies appear every year, it seems a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme, Bullock Oliveira, Maggie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867166
_version_ 1784778735535259648
author Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme
Bullock Oliveira, Maggie
author_facet Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme
Bullock Oliveira, Maggie
author_sort Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme
collection PubMed
description For decades now a research question has firmly established itself as a staple of psychological and neuroscientific investigations on language, namely the question of whether and how bilingualism is cognitively beneficial, detrimental or neutral. As more and more studies appear every year, it seems as though the research question itself is firmly grounded and can be answered if only we use the right experimental manipulations and subject the data to the right analysis methods and interpretive lens. In this paper we propose that, rather than merely improving prior methods in the pursuit of evidence in one direction or another, we would do well to carefully consider whether the research question itself is as firmly grounded as it might appear to be. We identify two bodies of research that suggest the research question to be highly problematic. In particular, drawing from work in sociolinguistics and in embodied cognitive science, we argue that the research question of whether bilingualism is cognitively advantageous or not is based on problematic assumptions about language and cognition. Once these assumptions are addressed head on, a straightforward answer to the question arises, but the question itself comes to seem to be a poor starting point for research. After examining why this is so, we conclude by exploring some implications for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9426683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94266832022-08-31 Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme Bullock Oliveira, Maggie Front Psychol Psychology For decades now a research question has firmly established itself as a staple of psychological and neuroscientific investigations on language, namely the question of whether and how bilingualism is cognitively beneficial, detrimental or neutral. As more and more studies appear every year, it seems as though the research question itself is firmly grounded and can be answered if only we use the right experimental manipulations and subject the data to the right analysis methods and interpretive lens. In this paper we propose that, rather than merely improving prior methods in the pursuit of evidence in one direction or another, we would do well to carefully consider whether the research question itself is as firmly grounded as it might appear to be. We identify two bodies of research that suggest the research question to be highly problematic. In particular, drawing from work in sociolinguistics and in embodied cognitive science, we argue that the research question of whether bilingualism is cognitively advantageous or not is based on problematic assumptions about language and cognition. Once these assumptions are addressed head on, a straightforward answer to the question arises, but the question itself comes to seem to be a poor starting point for research. After examining why this is so, we conclude by exploring some implications for future research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9426683/ /pubmed/36051209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867166 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sanches de Oliveira and Bullock Oliveira. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme
Bullock Oliveira, Maggie
Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
title Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
title_full Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
title_fullStr Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
title_full_unstemmed Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
title_short Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
title_sort bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867166
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchesdeoliveiraguilherme bilingualismisalwayscognitivelyadvantageousbutthisdoesntmeanwhatyouthinkitmeans
AT bullockoliveiramaggie bilingualismisalwayscognitivelyadvantageousbutthisdoesntmeanwhatyouthinkitmeans