Cargando…
Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an instrument about nutritional knowledge and feeding practices to be used in children aged 7–11 years, based on the latest Brazilian Food Guide. METHODS: Review on the subject; instrument creation; content validity with two groups of judges: first, nutritionists...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9432235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32084439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.11.006 |
_version_ | 1784780278360702976 |
---|---|
author | da Silva, Anelise Bozzetto Piccoli, Ângela B. Pellanda, Lucia C. |
author_facet | da Silva, Anelise Bozzetto Piccoli, Ângela B. Pellanda, Lucia C. |
author_sort | da Silva, Anelise Bozzetto |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an instrument about nutritional knowledge and feeding practices to be used in children aged 7–11 years, based on the latest Brazilian Food Guide. METHODS: Review on the subject; instrument creation; content validity with two groups of judges: first, nutritionists and, after adjustments, a multidisciplinary group (content validity index [CVI]); FACE validity; reproducibility analysis (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], level of agreement, and kappa [k]); internal consistency analysis (Cronbach's alpha[α]) and construct validity (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin and exploratory factorial analysis). The sample was calculated, considering at least ten subjects for each question of the questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a final sample of 453 children (53.6% girls), with a mean age of 9.45 years (SD = 1.44). The content validity showed a CVI ≥ 0.80 for relevance in 62.3% of the items for nutritionists’ group and 100% of the items for the multidisciplinary group, clarity (49.4%, 91.8%), and pertinence (58.8%, 98.4%), respectively. The test-retest showed a level of agreement of 84.3% and k = 0.740 for the Knowledge dimension and ICC = 0.754 for the Food Practices dimension. The internal consistency showed α = 0.589 for the Knowledge dimension and α = 0.618 for the Food Practices dimension. For the construct validity, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin was 0.724 and exploratory factorial analysis showed a variance of 47.01 with varimax rotation and defined five factors for the Practices Dimension. CONCLUSION: The Food Knowledge and Practices Questionnaire (Questionário de Conhecimento e Práticas Alimentares [QCPA]) instrument showed validity and reliability to assess nutritional knowledge and food practices in children aged 7–11 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9432235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94322352022-09-08 Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation da Silva, Anelise Bozzetto Piccoli, Ângela B. Pellanda, Lucia C. J Pediatr (Rio J) Original Article OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an instrument about nutritional knowledge and feeding practices to be used in children aged 7–11 years, based on the latest Brazilian Food Guide. METHODS: Review on the subject; instrument creation; content validity with two groups of judges: first, nutritionists and, after adjustments, a multidisciplinary group (content validity index [CVI]); FACE validity; reproducibility analysis (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], level of agreement, and kappa [k]); internal consistency analysis (Cronbach's alpha[α]) and construct validity (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin and exploratory factorial analysis). The sample was calculated, considering at least ten subjects for each question of the questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a final sample of 453 children (53.6% girls), with a mean age of 9.45 years (SD = 1.44). The content validity showed a CVI ≥ 0.80 for relevance in 62.3% of the items for nutritionists’ group and 100% of the items for the multidisciplinary group, clarity (49.4%, 91.8%), and pertinence (58.8%, 98.4%), respectively. The test-retest showed a level of agreement of 84.3% and k = 0.740 for the Knowledge dimension and ICC = 0.754 for the Food Practices dimension. The internal consistency showed α = 0.589 for the Knowledge dimension and α = 0.618 for the Food Practices dimension. For the construct validity, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin was 0.724 and exploratory factorial analysis showed a variance of 47.01 with varimax rotation and defined five factors for the Practices Dimension. CONCLUSION: The Food Knowledge and Practices Questionnaire (Questionário de Conhecimento e Práticas Alimentares [QCPA]) instrument showed validity and reliability to assess nutritional knowledge and food practices in children aged 7–11 years. Elsevier 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9432235/ /pubmed/32084439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.11.006 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article da Silva, Anelise Bozzetto Piccoli, Ângela B. Pellanda, Lucia C. Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
title | Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
title_full | Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
title_fullStr | Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
title_short | Knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
title_sort | knowledge and food practices questionnaire: construction and validation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9432235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32084439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2019.11.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasilvaanelisebozzetto knowledgeandfoodpracticesquestionnaireconstructionandvalidation AT piccoliangelab knowledgeandfoodpracticesquestionnaireconstructionandvalidation AT pellandaluciac knowledgeandfoodpracticesquestionnaireconstructionandvalidation |