Cargando…

Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) or hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) are associated with better nutritional status and less weight loss 1 year after surgery, compared with open oesophagectomy (OE). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kauppila, Joonas H, Rosenlund, Helen, Klevebro, Fredrik, Johar, Asif, Anandavadivelan, Poorna, Mälberg, Kalle, Lagergren, Pernilla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058763
_version_ 1784781755976253440
author Kauppila, Joonas H
Rosenlund, Helen
Klevebro, Fredrik
Johar, Asif
Anandavadivelan, Poorna
Mälberg, Kalle
Lagergren, Pernilla
author_facet Kauppila, Joonas H
Rosenlund, Helen
Klevebro, Fredrik
Johar, Asif
Anandavadivelan, Poorna
Mälberg, Kalle
Lagergren, Pernilla
author_sort Kauppila, Joonas H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) or hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) are associated with better nutritional status and less weight loss 1 year after surgery, compared with open oesophagectomy (OE). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: All patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer in Sweden during 2013–2018. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 424 patients alive at 1 year after surgery were eligible, and 281 completed the 1-year assessment. Of these, 239 had complete clinical data and were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was nutritional status at 1 year after surgery, assessed using the abbreviated Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment questionnaire. The secondary outcomes included postoperative weight loss at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 78 underwent MIE, 74 HMIE while 87 patients underwent OE. The MIE group had the highest prevalence of malnutrition (42% vs 22% after HMIE vs 25% after OE), reduced food intake (63% vs 45% after HMIE vs 39% after OE), symptoms reducing food intake (60% vs 45% after HMIE vs 60% after OE) and abnormal activities/function (45% vs 32% after HMIE vs 43% after OE). After adjustment for confounders, MIE was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of reduced food intake 1 year after surgery (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.47 to 5.61), compared with OE. Other outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the groups. No statistically significant associations were observed between surgical techniques and weight loss up to 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MIE was statistically significantly associated with reduced food intake 1 year after surgery. However, no differences were observed in weight loss between the surgical techniques. Further studies on nutritional impact of surgical techniques in oesophageal cancer are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9438117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94381172022-09-14 Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study Kauppila, Joonas H Rosenlund, Helen Klevebro, Fredrik Johar, Asif Anandavadivelan, Poorna Mälberg, Kalle Lagergren, Pernilla BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To explore whether the minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) or hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) are associated with better nutritional status and less weight loss 1 year after surgery, compared with open oesophagectomy (OE). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: All patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer in Sweden during 2013–2018. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 424 patients alive at 1 year after surgery were eligible, and 281 completed the 1-year assessment. Of these, 239 had complete clinical data and were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was nutritional status at 1 year after surgery, assessed using the abbreviated Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment questionnaire. The secondary outcomes included postoperative weight loss at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 78 underwent MIE, 74 HMIE while 87 patients underwent OE. The MIE group had the highest prevalence of malnutrition (42% vs 22% after HMIE vs 25% after OE), reduced food intake (63% vs 45% after HMIE vs 39% after OE), symptoms reducing food intake (60% vs 45% after HMIE vs 60% after OE) and abnormal activities/function (45% vs 32% after HMIE vs 43% after OE). After adjustment for confounders, MIE was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of reduced food intake 1 year after surgery (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.47 to 5.61), compared with OE. Other outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the groups. No statistically significant associations were observed between surgical techniques and weight loss up to 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MIE was statistically significantly associated with reduced food intake 1 year after surgery. However, no differences were observed in weight loss between the surgical techniques. Further studies on nutritional impact of surgical techniques in oesophageal cancer are needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9438117/ /pubmed/36581984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058763 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Kauppila, Joonas H
Rosenlund, Helen
Klevebro, Fredrik
Johar, Asif
Anandavadivelan, Poorna
Mälberg, Kalle
Lagergren, Pernilla
Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
title Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
title_full Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
title_short Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
title_sort minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058763
work_keys_str_mv AT kauppilajoonash minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT rosenlundhelen minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT klevebrofredrik minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT joharasif minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT anandavadivelanpoorna minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT malbergkalle minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT lagergrenpernilla minimallyinvasivesurgicaltechniquesforoesophagealcancerandnutritionalrecoveryaprospectivepopulationbasedcohortstudy