Cargando…
Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults
BACKGROUND: Food literacy is theorised to improve diet quality, nutrition behaviours, social connectedness and food security. The definition and conceptualisation by Vidgen & Gallegos, consisting of 11 theoretical components within the four domains of planning and managing, selecting, preparing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8 |
_version_ | 1784781802205872128 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Courtney Byrne, Rebecca Adams, Jean Vidgen, Helen Anna |
author_facet | Thompson, Courtney Byrne, Rebecca Adams, Jean Vidgen, Helen Anna |
author_sort | Thompson, Courtney |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Food literacy is theorised to improve diet quality, nutrition behaviours, social connectedness and food security. The definition and conceptualisation by Vidgen & Gallegos, consisting of 11 theoretical components within the four domains of planning and managing, selecting, preparing and eating, is currently the most highly cited framework. However, a valid and reliable questionnaire is needed to comprehensively measure this conceptualisation. Therefore, this study draws on existing item pools to develop a comprehensive food literacy questionnaire using item response theory. METHODS: Five hundred Australian adults were recruited in Study 1 to refine a food literacy item pool using principal component analysis (PCA) and item response theory (IRT) which involved detailed item analysis on targeting, responsiveness, validity and reliability. Another 500 participants were recruited in Study 2 to replicate item analysis on validity and reliability on the refined item pool, and 250 of these participants re-completed the food literacy questionnaire to determine its test–retest reliability. RESULTS: The PCA saw the 171-item pool reduced to 100-items across 19 statistical components of food literacy. After the thresholds of 26 items were combined, responses to the food literacy questionnaire had ordered thresholds (targeting), acceptable item locations (< -0.01 to + 1.53) and appropriateness of the measurement model (n = 92% expected responses) (responsiveness), met outfit mean-squares MSQ (0.48—1.42) (validity) and had high person, item separation (> 0.99) and test–retest (ICC 2,1 0.55–0.88) scores (reliability). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a 100-item food literacy questionnaire, the IFLQ-19 to comprehensively address the Vidgen & Gallegos theoretical domains and components with good targeting, responsiveness, reliability and validity in a diverse sample of Australian adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9438317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94383172022-09-03 Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults Thompson, Courtney Byrne, Rebecca Adams, Jean Vidgen, Helen Anna Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Food literacy is theorised to improve diet quality, nutrition behaviours, social connectedness and food security. The definition and conceptualisation by Vidgen & Gallegos, consisting of 11 theoretical components within the four domains of planning and managing, selecting, preparing and eating, is currently the most highly cited framework. However, a valid and reliable questionnaire is needed to comprehensively measure this conceptualisation. Therefore, this study draws on existing item pools to develop a comprehensive food literacy questionnaire using item response theory. METHODS: Five hundred Australian adults were recruited in Study 1 to refine a food literacy item pool using principal component analysis (PCA) and item response theory (IRT) which involved detailed item analysis on targeting, responsiveness, validity and reliability. Another 500 participants were recruited in Study 2 to replicate item analysis on validity and reliability on the refined item pool, and 250 of these participants re-completed the food literacy questionnaire to determine its test–retest reliability. RESULTS: The PCA saw the 171-item pool reduced to 100-items across 19 statistical components of food literacy. After the thresholds of 26 items were combined, responses to the food literacy questionnaire had ordered thresholds (targeting), acceptable item locations (< -0.01 to + 1.53) and appropriateness of the measurement model (n = 92% expected responses) (responsiveness), met outfit mean-squares MSQ (0.48—1.42) (validity) and had high person, item separation (> 0.99) and test–retest (ICC 2,1 0.55–0.88) scores (reliability). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a 100-item food literacy questionnaire, the IFLQ-19 to comprehensively address the Vidgen & Gallegos theoretical domains and components with good targeting, responsiveness, reliability and validity in a diverse sample of Australian adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8. BioMed Central 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9438317/ /pubmed/36050778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Thompson, Courtney Byrne, Rebecca Adams, Jean Vidgen, Helen Anna Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults |
title | Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults |
title_full | Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults |
title_fullStr | Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults |
title_short | Development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (IFLQ-19) with Australian adults |
title_sort | development, validation and item reduction of a food literacy questionnaire (iflq-19) with australian adults |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01351-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsoncourtney developmentvalidationanditemreductionofafoodliteracyquestionnaireiflq19withaustralianadults AT byrnerebecca developmentvalidationanditemreductionofafoodliteracyquestionnaireiflq19withaustralianadults AT adamsjean developmentvalidationanditemreductionofafoodliteracyquestionnaireiflq19withaustralianadults AT vidgenhelenanna developmentvalidationanditemreductionofafoodliteracyquestionnaireiflq19withaustralianadults |