Cargando…
DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covale...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094369 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80310 |
_version_ | 1784788207669346304 |
---|---|
author | Collier, James E Nasmyth, Kim A |
author_facet | Collier, James E Nasmyth, Kim A |
author_sort | Collier, James E |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covalently circularizing the ring by crosslinking its three interfaces induces catenation of individual and sister DNAs. If the model applies to real chromatids, then the ring must have a DNA entry gate essential for mitosis. Whether this is situated at the Smc3/Scc1 or Smc1/Smc3 hinge interface is an open question. We have previously demonstrated DNA entrapment by cohesin in vitro (Collier et al., 2020). Here we show that cohesin in fact possesses two DNA gates, one at the Smc3/Scc1 interface and a second at the Smc1/3 hinge. Unlike the Smc3/Scc1 interface, passage of DNAs through SMC hinges depends on both Scc2 and Scc3, a pair of regulatory subunits necessary for entrapment in vivo. This property together with the lethality caused by locking this interface but not that between Smc3 and Scc1 in vivo suggests that passage of DNAs through the hinge is essential for building sister chromatid cohesion. Passage of DNAs through the Smc3/Scc1 interface is necessary for cohesin’s separase-independent release from chromosomes and may therefore largely serve as an exit gate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9467508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94675082022-09-13 DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface Collier, James E Nasmyth, Kim A eLife Biochemistry and Chemical Biology The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covalently circularizing the ring by crosslinking its three interfaces induces catenation of individual and sister DNAs. If the model applies to real chromatids, then the ring must have a DNA entry gate essential for mitosis. Whether this is situated at the Smc3/Scc1 or Smc1/Smc3 hinge interface is an open question. We have previously demonstrated DNA entrapment by cohesin in vitro (Collier et al., 2020). Here we show that cohesin in fact possesses two DNA gates, one at the Smc3/Scc1 interface and a second at the Smc1/3 hinge. Unlike the Smc3/Scc1 interface, passage of DNAs through SMC hinges depends on both Scc2 and Scc3, a pair of regulatory subunits necessary for entrapment in vivo. This property together with the lethality caused by locking this interface but not that between Smc3 and Scc1 in vivo suggests that passage of DNAs through the hinge is essential for building sister chromatid cohesion. Passage of DNAs through the Smc3/Scc1 interface is necessary for cohesin’s separase-independent release from chromosomes and may therefore largely serve as an exit gate. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9467508/ /pubmed/36094369 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80310 Text en © 2022, Collier and Nasmyth https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biochemistry and Chemical Biology Collier, James E Nasmyth, Kim A DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface |
title | DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface |
title_full | DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface |
title_fullStr | DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface |
title_short | DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface |
title_sort | dna passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its smc3–kleisin interface |
topic | Biochemistry and Chemical Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094369 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT collierjamese dnapassesthroughcohesinshingeaswellasitssmc3kleisininterface AT nasmythkima dnapassesthroughcohesinshingeaswellasitssmc3kleisininterface |