Cargando…

DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface

The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collier, James E, Nasmyth, Kim A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094369
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80310
_version_ 1784788207669346304
author Collier, James E
Nasmyth, Kim A
author_facet Collier, James E
Nasmyth, Kim A
author_sort Collier, James E
collection PubMed
description The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covalently circularizing the ring by crosslinking its three interfaces induces catenation of individual and sister DNAs. If the model applies to real chromatids, then the ring must have a DNA entry gate essential for mitosis. Whether this is situated at the Smc3/Scc1 or Smc1/Smc3 hinge interface is an open question. We have previously demonstrated DNA entrapment by cohesin in vitro (Collier et al., 2020). Here we show that cohesin in fact possesses two DNA gates, one at the Smc3/Scc1 interface and a second at the Smc1/3 hinge. Unlike the Smc3/Scc1 interface, passage of DNAs through SMC hinges depends on both Scc2 and Scc3, a pair of regulatory subunits necessary for entrapment in vivo. This property together with the lethality caused by locking this interface but not that between Smc3 and Scc1 in vivo suggests that passage of DNAs through the hinge is essential for building sister chromatid cohesion. Passage of DNAs through the Smc3/Scc1 interface is necessary for cohesin’s separase-independent release from chromosomes and may therefore largely serve as an exit gate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9467508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94675082022-09-13 DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface Collier, James E Nasmyth, Kim A eLife Biochemistry and Chemical Biology The ring model proposes that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by co-entrapment of sister DNAs inside a single tripartite cohesin ring. The model explains how Scc1 cleavage triggers anaphase but has hitherto only been rigorously tested using small circular mini-chromosomes in yeast, where covalently circularizing the ring by crosslinking its three interfaces induces catenation of individual and sister DNAs. If the model applies to real chromatids, then the ring must have a DNA entry gate essential for mitosis. Whether this is situated at the Smc3/Scc1 or Smc1/Smc3 hinge interface is an open question. We have previously demonstrated DNA entrapment by cohesin in vitro (Collier et al., 2020). Here we show that cohesin in fact possesses two DNA gates, one at the Smc3/Scc1 interface and a second at the Smc1/3 hinge. Unlike the Smc3/Scc1 interface, passage of DNAs through SMC hinges depends on both Scc2 and Scc3, a pair of regulatory subunits necessary for entrapment in vivo. This property together with the lethality caused by locking this interface but not that between Smc3 and Scc1 in vivo suggests that passage of DNAs through the hinge is essential for building sister chromatid cohesion. Passage of DNAs through the Smc3/Scc1 interface is necessary for cohesin’s separase-independent release from chromosomes and may therefore largely serve as an exit gate. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9467508/ /pubmed/36094369 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80310 Text en © 2022, Collier and Nasmyth https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
Collier, James E
Nasmyth, Kim A
DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
title DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
title_full DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
title_fullStr DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
title_full_unstemmed DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
title_short DNA passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its Smc3–kleisin interface
title_sort dna passes through cohesin’s hinge as well as its smc3–kleisin interface
topic Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094369
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80310
work_keys_str_mv AT collierjamese dnapassesthroughcohesinshingeaswellasitssmc3kleisininterface
AT nasmythkima dnapassesthroughcohesinshingeaswellasitssmc3kleisininterface