Cargando…
Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming
Both active response execution and passive listening to verbal codes (a form of instruction) in single prime trials lead to item-specific repetition priming effects when stimuli re-occur in single probe trials. This holds for task-specific classification (stimulus–classification, SC priming, e.g., a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z |
_version_ | 1784788886926393344 |
---|---|
author | Jargow, Janine Wolfensteller, Uta Pfeuffer, Christina U. Ruge, Hannes |
author_facet | Jargow, Janine Wolfensteller, Uta Pfeuffer, Christina U. Ruge, Hannes |
author_sort | Jargow, Janine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both active response execution and passive listening to verbal codes (a form of instruction) in single prime trials lead to item-specific repetition priming effects when stimuli re-occur in single probe trials. This holds for task-specific classification (stimulus–classification, SC priming, e.g., apple–small) and action (stimulus–action, SA priming, e.g., apple–right key press). To address the influence of expectation on item-specific SC and SA associations, we tested if item-specific SC and SA priming effects were modulated by the instructed probability of re-encountering individual SC or SA mappings (25% vs. 75% instructed switch probability). Importantly, the experienced item-specific switch probability was always 50%. In Experiment 1 (N = 78), item-specific SA/SC switch expectations affected SA, but not SC priming effects exclusively following active response execution. Experiment 2 (N = 40) was designed to emphasize SA priming by only including item-specific SC repetitions. This yielded stronger SA priming for 25% vs. 75% expected switch probability, both following response execution as in Experiment 1 and also following verbally coded SA associations. Together, these results suggest that SA priming effects, that is, the encoding and retrieval of SA associations, is modulated by item-specific switch expectation. Importantly, this expectation effect cannot be explained by item-specific associative learning mechanisms, as stimuli were primed and probed only once and participants experienced item-specific repetitions/switches equally often across stimuli independent of instructed switch probabilities. This corroborates and extends previous results by showing that SA priming effects are modulated by expectation not only based on experienced item-specific switch probabilities, but also on mere instruction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9470635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94706352022-09-15 Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming Jargow, Janine Wolfensteller, Uta Pfeuffer, Christina U. Ruge, Hannes Psychol Res Original Article Both active response execution and passive listening to verbal codes (a form of instruction) in single prime trials lead to item-specific repetition priming effects when stimuli re-occur in single probe trials. This holds for task-specific classification (stimulus–classification, SC priming, e.g., apple–small) and action (stimulus–action, SA priming, e.g., apple–right key press). To address the influence of expectation on item-specific SC and SA associations, we tested if item-specific SC and SA priming effects were modulated by the instructed probability of re-encountering individual SC or SA mappings (25% vs. 75% instructed switch probability). Importantly, the experienced item-specific switch probability was always 50%. In Experiment 1 (N = 78), item-specific SA/SC switch expectations affected SA, but not SC priming effects exclusively following active response execution. Experiment 2 (N = 40) was designed to emphasize SA priming by only including item-specific SC repetitions. This yielded stronger SA priming for 25% vs. 75% expected switch probability, both following response execution as in Experiment 1 and also following verbally coded SA associations. Together, these results suggest that SA priming effects, that is, the encoding and retrieval of SA associations, is modulated by item-specific switch expectation. Importantly, this expectation effect cannot be explained by item-specific associative learning mechanisms, as stimuli were primed and probed only once and participants experienced item-specific repetitions/switches equally often across stimuli independent of instructed switch probabilities. This corroborates and extends previous results by showing that SA priming effects are modulated by expectation not only based on experienced item-specific switch probabilities, but also on mere instruction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9470635/ /pubmed/35041058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jargow, Janine Wolfensteller, Uta Pfeuffer, Christina U. Ruge, Hannes Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
title | Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
title_full | Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
title_fullStr | Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
title_full_unstemmed | Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
title_short | Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
title_sort | instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus–action priming |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01641-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jargowjanine instructingitemspecificswitchprobabilityexpectationsmodulatestimulusactionpriming AT wolfenstelleruta instructingitemspecificswitchprobabilityexpectationsmodulatestimulusactionpriming AT pfeufferchristinau instructingitemspecificswitchprobabilityexpectationsmodulatestimulusactionpriming AT rugehannes instructingitemspecificswitchprobabilityexpectationsmodulatestimulusactionpriming |