Cargando…
Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
PURPOSE: Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for Cancer Research
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9475248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1102 |
_version_ | 1784789871700738048 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Natalie C. Byrne, Ryan M. Leslie, Holly Wood, Colin Legrini, Assya Cameron, Andrew J. Ahmaderaghi, Baharak Corry, Shania M. Malla, Sudhir B. Amirkhah, Raheleh McCooey, Aoife J. Rogan, Emily Redmond, Keara L. Sakhnevych, Svetlana Domingo, Enric Jackson, James Loughrey, Maurice B. Leedham, Simon Maughan, Tim Lawler, Mark Sansom, Owen J. Lamrock, Felicity Koelzer, Viktor H. Jamieson, Nigel B. Dunne, Philip D. |
author_facet | Fisher, Natalie C. Byrne, Ryan M. Leslie, Holly Wood, Colin Legrini, Assya Cameron, Andrew J. Ahmaderaghi, Baharak Corry, Shania M. Malla, Sudhir B. Amirkhah, Raheleh McCooey, Aoife J. Rogan, Emily Redmond, Keara L. Sakhnevych, Svetlana Domingo, Enric Jackson, James Loughrey, Maurice B. Leedham, Simon Maughan, Tim Lawler, Mark Sansom, Owen J. Lamrock, Felicity Koelzer, Viktor H. Jamieson, Nigel B. Dunne, Philip D. |
author_sort | Fisher, Natalie C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithelial cell focus, are being applied to heterogeneous tumor samples where the expression of the genes in the signature may no longer be epithelial-specific. Therefore, unknowingly, even small changes in tumor stroma percentage can directly influence GESs, undermining the intended mechanistic signaling. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using colorectal cancer as an exemplar, we deployed numerous orthogonal profiling methodologies, including laser capture microdissection, flow cytometry, bulk and multiregional biopsy clinical samples, single-cell RNA sequencing and finally spatial transcriptomics, to perform a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the most widely used GESs to be influenced, or confounded, by stromal content in tumor tissue. To complement this work, we generated a freely-available resource, ConfoundR; https://confoundr.qub.ac.uk/, that enables users to test the extent of stromal influence on an unlimited number of the genes/signatures simultaneously across colorectal, breast, pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer datasets. RESULTS: Findings presented here demonstrate the clear potential for misinterpretation of the meaning of GESs, due to widespread stromal influences, which in-turn can undermine faithful alignment between clinical samples and preclinical data/models, particularly cell lines and organoids, or tumor models not fully recapitulating the stromal and immune microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to faithfully align preclinical models of disease using phenotypically-designed GESs must ensure that the signatures themselves remain representative of the same biology when applied to clinical samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9475248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Association for Cancer Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94752482022-09-23 Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data Fisher, Natalie C. Byrne, Ryan M. Leslie, Holly Wood, Colin Legrini, Assya Cameron, Andrew J. Ahmaderaghi, Baharak Corry, Shania M. Malla, Sudhir B. Amirkhah, Raheleh McCooey, Aoife J. Rogan, Emily Redmond, Keara L. Sakhnevych, Svetlana Domingo, Enric Jackson, James Loughrey, Maurice B. Leedham, Simon Maughan, Tim Lawler, Mark Sansom, Owen J. Lamrock, Felicity Koelzer, Viktor H. Jamieson, Nigel B. Dunne, Philip D. Clin Cancer Res Precision Medicine and Imaging PURPOSE: Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithelial cell focus, are being applied to heterogeneous tumor samples where the expression of the genes in the signature may no longer be epithelial-specific. Therefore, unknowingly, even small changes in tumor stroma percentage can directly influence GESs, undermining the intended mechanistic signaling. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using colorectal cancer as an exemplar, we deployed numerous orthogonal profiling methodologies, including laser capture microdissection, flow cytometry, bulk and multiregional biopsy clinical samples, single-cell RNA sequencing and finally spatial transcriptomics, to perform a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the most widely used GESs to be influenced, or confounded, by stromal content in tumor tissue. To complement this work, we generated a freely-available resource, ConfoundR; https://confoundr.qub.ac.uk/, that enables users to test the extent of stromal influence on an unlimited number of the genes/signatures simultaneously across colorectal, breast, pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer datasets. RESULTS: Findings presented here demonstrate the clear potential for misinterpretation of the meaning of GESs, due to widespread stromal influences, which in-turn can undermine faithful alignment between clinical samples and preclinical data/models, particularly cell lines and organoids, or tumor models not fully recapitulating the stromal and immune microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to faithfully align preclinical models of disease using phenotypically-designed GESs must ensure that the signatures themselves remain representative of the same biology when applied to clinical samples. American Association for Cancer Research 2022-09-15 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9475248/ /pubmed/35792866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1102 Text en ©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. |
spellingShingle | Precision Medicine and Imaging Fisher, Natalie C. Byrne, Ryan M. Leslie, Holly Wood, Colin Legrini, Assya Cameron, Andrew J. Ahmaderaghi, Baharak Corry, Shania M. Malla, Sudhir B. Amirkhah, Raheleh McCooey, Aoife J. Rogan, Emily Redmond, Keara L. Sakhnevych, Svetlana Domingo, Enric Jackson, James Loughrey, Maurice B. Leedham, Simon Maughan, Tim Lawler, Mark Sansom, Owen J. Lamrock, Felicity Koelzer, Viktor H. Jamieson, Nigel B. Dunne, Philip D. Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data |
title | Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data |
title_full | Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data |
title_fullStr | Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data |
title_short | Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data |
title_sort | biological misinterpretation of transcriptional signatures in tumor samples can unknowingly undermine mechanistic understanding and faithful alignment with preclinical data |
topic | Precision Medicine and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9475248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fishernataliec biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT byrneryanm biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT leslieholly biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT woodcolin biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT legriniassya biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT cameronandrewj biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT ahmaderaghibaharak biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT corryshaniam biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT mallasudhirb biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT amirkhahraheleh biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT mccooeyaoifej biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT roganemily biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT redmondkearal biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT sakhnevychsvetlana biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT domingoenric biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT jacksonjames biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT loughreymauriceb biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT leedhamsimon biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT maughantim biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT lawlermark biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT sansomowenj biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT lamrockfelicity biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT koelzerviktorh biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT jamiesonnigelb biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata AT dunnephilipd biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata |