Cargando…

Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data

PURPOSE: Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Natalie C., Byrne, Ryan M., Leslie, Holly, Wood, Colin, Legrini, Assya, Cameron, Andrew J., Ahmaderaghi, Baharak, Corry, Shania M., Malla, Sudhir B., Amirkhah, Raheleh, McCooey, Aoife J., Rogan, Emily, Redmond, Keara L., Sakhnevych, Svetlana, Domingo, Enric, Jackson, James, Loughrey, Maurice B., Leedham, Simon, Maughan, Tim, Lawler, Mark, Sansom, Owen J., Lamrock, Felicity, Koelzer, Viktor H., Jamieson, Nigel B., Dunne, Philip D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9475248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1102
_version_ 1784789871700738048
author Fisher, Natalie C.
Byrne, Ryan M.
Leslie, Holly
Wood, Colin
Legrini, Assya
Cameron, Andrew J.
Ahmaderaghi, Baharak
Corry, Shania M.
Malla, Sudhir B.
Amirkhah, Raheleh
McCooey, Aoife J.
Rogan, Emily
Redmond, Keara L.
Sakhnevych, Svetlana
Domingo, Enric
Jackson, James
Loughrey, Maurice B.
Leedham, Simon
Maughan, Tim
Lawler, Mark
Sansom, Owen J.
Lamrock, Felicity
Koelzer, Viktor H.
Jamieson, Nigel B.
Dunne, Philip D.
author_facet Fisher, Natalie C.
Byrne, Ryan M.
Leslie, Holly
Wood, Colin
Legrini, Assya
Cameron, Andrew J.
Ahmaderaghi, Baharak
Corry, Shania M.
Malla, Sudhir B.
Amirkhah, Raheleh
McCooey, Aoife J.
Rogan, Emily
Redmond, Keara L.
Sakhnevych, Svetlana
Domingo, Enric
Jackson, James
Loughrey, Maurice B.
Leedham, Simon
Maughan, Tim
Lawler, Mark
Sansom, Owen J.
Lamrock, Felicity
Koelzer, Viktor H.
Jamieson, Nigel B.
Dunne, Philip D.
author_sort Fisher, Natalie C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithelial cell focus, are being applied to heterogeneous tumor samples where the expression of the genes in the signature may no longer be epithelial-specific. Therefore, unknowingly, even small changes in tumor stroma percentage can directly influence GESs, undermining the intended mechanistic signaling. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using colorectal cancer as an exemplar, we deployed numerous orthogonal profiling methodologies, including laser capture microdissection, flow cytometry, bulk and multiregional biopsy clinical samples, single-cell RNA sequencing and finally spatial transcriptomics, to perform a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the most widely used GESs to be influenced, or confounded, by stromal content in tumor tissue. To complement this work, we generated a freely-available resource, ConfoundR; https://confoundr.qub.ac.uk/, that enables users to test the extent of stromal influence on an unlimited number of the genes/signatures simultaneously across colorectal, breast, pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer datasets. RESULTS: Findings presented here demonstrate the clear potential for misinterpretation of the meaning of GESs, due to widespread stromal influences, which in-turn can undermine faithful alignment between clinical samples and preclinical data/models, particularly cell lines and organoids, or tumor models not fully recapitulating the stromal and immune microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to faithfully align preclinical models of disease using phenotypically-designed GESs must ensure that the signatures themselves remain representative of the same biology when applied to clinical samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9475248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94752482022-09-23 Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data Fisher, Natalie C. Byrne, Ryan M. Leslie, Holly Wood, Colin Legrini, Assya Cameron, Andrew J. Ahmaderaghi, Baharak Corry, Shania M. Malla, Sudhir B. Amirkhah, Raheleh McCooey, Aoife J. Rogan, Emily Redmond, Keara L. Sakhnevych, Svetlana Domingo, Enric Jackson, James Loughrey, Maurice B. Leedham, Simon Maughan, Tim Lawler, Mark Sansom, Owen J. Lamrock, Felicity Koelzer, Viktor H. Jamieson, Nigel B. Dunne, Philip D. Clin Cancer Res Precision Medicine and Imaging PURPOSE: Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithelial cell focus, are being applied to heterogeneous tumor samples where the expression of the genes in the signature may no longer be epithelial-specific. Therefore, unknowingly, even small changes in tumor stroma percentage can directly influence GESs, undermining the intended mechanistic signaling. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using colorectal cancer as an exemplar, we deployed numerous orthogonal profiling methodologies, including laser capture microdissection, flow cytometry, bulk and multiregional biopsy clinical samples, single-cell RNA sequencing and finally spatial transcriptomics, to perform a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the most widely used GESs to be influenced, or confounded, by stromal content in tumor tissue. To complement this work, we generated a freely-available resource, ConfoundR; https://confoundr.qub.ac.uk/, that enables users to test the extent of stromal influence on an unlimited number of the genes/signatures simultaneously across colorectal, breast, pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer datasets. RESULTS: Findings presented here demonstrate the clear potential for misinterpretation of the meaning of GESs, due to widespread stromal influences, which in-turn can undermine faithful alignment between clinical samples and preclinical data/models, particularly cell lines and organoids, or tumor models not fully recapitulating the stromal and immune microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to faithfully align preclinical models of disease using phenotypically-designed GESs must ensure that the signatures themselves remain representative of the same biology when applied to clinical samples. American Association for Cancer Research 2022-09-15 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9475248/ /pubmed/35792866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1102 Text en ©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Precision Medicine and Imaging
Fisher, Natalie C.
Byrne, Ryan M.
Leslie, Holly
Wood, Colin
Legrini, Assya
Cameron, Andrew J.
Ahmaderaghi, Baharak
Corry, Shania M.
Malla, Sudhir B.
Amirkhah, Raheleh
McCooey, Aoife J.
Rogan, Emily
Redmond, Keara L.
Sakhnevych, Svetlana
Domingo, Enric
Jackson, James
Loughrey, Maurice B.
Leedham, Simon
Maughan, Tim
Lawler, Mark
Sansom, Owen J.
Lamrock, Felicity
Koelzer, Viktor H.
Jamieson, Nigel B.
Dunne, Philip D.
Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
title Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
title_full Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
title_fullStr Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
title_full_unstemmed Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
title_short Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data
title_sort biological misinterpretation of transcriptional signatures in tumor samples can unknowingly undermine mechanistic understanding and faithful alignment with preclinical data
topic Precision Medicine and Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9475248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1102
work_keys_str_mv AT fishernataliec biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT byrneryanm biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT leslieholly biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT woodcolin biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT legriniassya biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT cameronandrewj biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT ahmaderaghibaharak biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT corryshaniam biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT mallasudhirb biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT amirkhahraheleh biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT mccooeyaoifej biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT roganemily biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT redmondkearal biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT sakhnevychsvetlana biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT domingoenric biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT jacksonjames biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT loughreymauriceb biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT leedhamsimon biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT maughantim biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT lawlermark biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT sansomowenj biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT lamrockfelicity biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT koelzerviktorh biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT jamiesonnigelb biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata
AT dunnephilipd biologicalmisinterpretationoftranscriptionalsignaturesintumorsamplescanunknowinglyunderminemechanisticunderstandingandfaithfulalignmentwithpreclinicaldata