Cargando…
Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays
Most epigenetic epidemiology to date has utilized microarrays to identify positions in the genome where variation in DNA methylation is associated with environmental exposures or disease. However, these profile less than 3% of DNA methylation sites in the human genome, potentially missing affected l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddac112 |
_version_ | 1784790177817821184 |
---|---|
author | Flynn, Robert Washer, Sam Jeffries, Aaron R Andrayas, Alexandria Shireby, Gemma Kumari, Meena Schalkwyk, Leonard C Mill, Jonathan Hannon, Eilis |
author_facet | Flynn, Robert Washer, Sam Jeffries, Aaron R Andrayas, Alexandria Shireby, Gemma Kumari, Meena Schalkwyk, Leonard C Mill, Jonathan Hannon, Eilis |
author_sort | Flynn, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most epigenetic epidemiology to date has utilized microarrays to identify positions in the genome where variation in DNA methylation is associated with environmental exposures or disease. However, these profile less than 3% of DNA methylation sites in the human genome, potentially missing affected loci and preventing the discovery of disrupted biological pathways. Third generation sequencing technologies, including Nanopore sequencing, have the potential to revolutionize the generation of epigenetic data, not only by providing genuine genome-wide coverage but profiling epigenetic modifications direct from native DNA. Here we assess the viability of using Nanopore sequencing for epidemiology by performing a comparison with DNA methylation quantified using the most comprehensive microarray available, the Illumina EPIC array. We implemented a CRISPR-Cas9 targeted sequencing approach in concert with Nanopore sequencing to profile DNA methylation in three genomic regions to attempt to rediscover genomic positions that existing technologies have shown are differentially methylated in tobacco smokers. Using Nanopore sequencing reads, DNA methylation was quantified at 1779 CpGs across three regions, providing a finer resolution of DNA methylation patterns compared to the EPIC array. The correlation of estimated levels of DNA methylation between platforms was high. Furthermore, we identified 12 CpGs where hypomethylation was significantly associated with smoking status, including 10 within the AHRR gene. In summary, Nanopore sequencing is a valid option for identifying genomic loci where large differences in DNAm are associated with a phenotype and has the potential to advance our understanding of the role differential methylation plays in the etiology of complex disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9476619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94766192022-09-19 Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays Flynn, Robert Washer, Sam Jeffries, Aaron R Andrayas, Alexandria Shireby, Gemma Kumari, Meena Schalkwyk, Leonard C Mill, Jonathan Hannon, Eilis Hum Mol Genet Original Article Most epigenetic epidemiology to date has utilized microarrays to identify positions in the genome where variation in DNA methylation is associated with environmental exposures or disease. However, these profile less than 3% of DNA methylation sites in the human genome, potentially missing affected loci and preventing the discovery of disrupted biological pathways. Third generation sequencing technologies, including Nanopore sequencing, have the potential to revolutionize the generation of epigenetic data, not only by providing genuine genome-wide coverage but profiling epigenetic modifications direct from native DNA. Here we assess the viability of using Nanopore sequencing for epidemiology by performing a comparison with DNA methylation quantified using the most comprehensive microarray available, the Illumina EPIC array. We implemented a CRISPR-Cas9 targeted sequencing approach in concert with Nanopore sequencing to profile DNA methylation in three genomic regions to attempt to rediscover genomic positions that existing technologies have shown are differentially methylated in tobacco smokers. Using Nanopore sequencing reads, DNA methylation was quantified at 1779 CpGs across three regions, providing a finer resolution of DNA methylation patterns compared to the EPIC array. The correlation of estimated levels of DNA methylation between platforms was high. Furthermore, we identified 12 CpGs where hypomethylation was significantly associated with smoking status, including 10 within the AHRR gene. In summary, Nanopore sequencing is a valid option for identifying genomic loci where large differences in DNAm are associated with a phenotype and has the potential to advance our understanding of the role differential methylation plays in the etiology of complex disease. Oxford University Press 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9476619/ /pubmed/35567415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddac112 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Flynn, Robert Washer, Sam Jeffries, Aaron R Andrayas, Alexandria Shireby, Gemma Kumari, Meena Schalkwyk, Leonard C Mill, Jonathan Hannon, Eilis Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays |
title | Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays |
title_full | Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays |
title_short | Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays |
title_sort | evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with dna methylation microarrays |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddac112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flynnrobert evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT washersam evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT jeffriesaaronr evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT andrayasalexandria evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT shirebygemma evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT kumarimeena evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT schalkwykleonardc evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT milljonathan evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays AT hannoneilis evaluationofnanoporesequencingforepigeneticepidemiologyacomparisonwithdnamethylationmicroarrays |