Cargando…
Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design
This paper reviews algorithmic or artificial intelligence (AI) bias in education technology, especially through the lenses of speculative fiction, speculative and liberatory design. It discusses the causes of the bias and reviews literature on various ways that algorithmic/AI bias manifests in educa...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00783-0 |
_version_ | 1784791664046374912 |
---|---|
author | Gaskins, Nettrice |
author_facet | Gaskins, Nettrice |
author_sort | Gaskins, Nettrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper reviews algorithmic or artificial intelligence (AI) bias in education technology, especially through the lenses of speculative fiction, speculative and liberatory design. It discusses the causes of the bias and reviews literature on various ways that algorithmic/AI bias manifests in education and in communities that are underrepresented in EdTech software development. While other recent work has responded to mainstream or private sector technology development, this review looks elsewhere where practitioners, artists, and activists engage underrepresented communities in brainstorming processes to identify and solve tough challenges. Their creative work includes films, toolkits, applications, prototypes and other physical artifacts, and other future-facing ideas that can provide guideposts for private sector development. Acknowledging the gaps in what has been studied, this paper proposes a different approach that includes speculative and liberatory design thinking, which can help developers better understand the educational and personal contexts of underrepresented groups. Early efforts to advocate for fairness and equity in AI and EdTech by groups such as the Algorithmic Justice League, the EdTech Equity Project, and EdSAFE AI Alliance is also explored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9483409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94834092022-09-19 Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design Gaskins, Nettrice TechTrends Original Paper This paper reviews algorithmic or artificial intelligence (AI) bias in education technology, especially through the lenses of speculative fiction, speculative and liberatory design. It discusses the causes of the bias and reviews literature on various ways that algorithmic/AI bias manifests in education and in communities that are underrepresented in EdTech software development. While other recent work has responded to mainstream or private sector technology development, this review looks elsewhere where practitioners, artists, and activists engage underrepresented communities in brainstorming processes to identify and solve tough challenges. Their creative work includes films, toolkits, applications, prototypes and other physical artifacts, and other future-facing ideas that can provide guideposts for private sector development. Acknowledging the gaps in what has been studied, this paper proposes a different approach that includes speculative and liberatory design thinking, which can help developers better understand the educational and personal contexts of underrepresented groups. Early efforts to advocate for fairness and equity in AI and EdTech by groups such as the Algorithmic Justice League, the EdTech Equity Project, and EdSAFE AI Alliance is also explored. Springer US 2022-09-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9483409/ /pubmed/36160677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00783-0 Text en © Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gaskins, Nettrice Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design |
title | Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design |
title_full | Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design |
title_fullStr | Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design |
title_short | Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design |
title_sort | interrogating algorithmic bias: from speculative fiction to liberatory design |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00783-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaskinsnettrice interrogatingalgorithmicbiasfromspeculativefictiontoliberatorydesign |