Cargando…
Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks
In this study, we conducted a pseudosign (nonce sign) repetition task with 22 children (mean age: 6;04) acquiring American Sign Language (ASL) as a first language (L1) from deaf parents. Thirty-nine pseudosigns with varying complexity were developed and organized into eight categories depending on n...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921047 |
_version_ | 1784794320962846720 |
---|---|
author | Gu, Shengyun Chen Pichler, Deborah Kozak, L. Viola Lillo-Martin, Diane |
author_facet | Gu, Shengyun Chen Pichler, Deborah Kozak, L. Viola Lillo-Martin, Diane |
author_sort | Gu, Shengyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we conducted a pseudosign (nonce sign) repetition task with 22 children (mean age: 6;04) acquiring American Sign Language (ASL) as a first language (L1) from deaf parents. Thirty-nine pseudosigns with varying complexity were developed and organized into eight categories depending on number of hands, number of simultaneous movement types, and number of movement sequences. Pseudosigns also varied in handshape complexity. The children’s performance on the ASL pseudosign task improved with age, displaying relatively accurate (re)production of location and orientation, but much less accurate handshape and movement, a finding in line with real sign productions for both L1 and L2 signers. Handshapes with higher complexity were correlated with lower accuracy in the handshape parameter. We found main effects of sequential and simultaneous movement combinations on overall performance. Items with no movement sequence were produced with higher overall accuracy than those with a movement sequence. Items with two simultaneous movement types or a single movement type were produced with higher overall accuracy than those with three simultaneous movement types. Finally, number of hands did not affect the overall accuracy. Remarkably, movement sequences impose processing constraints on signing children whereas complex hands (two hands) and two simultaneous movement types do not significantly lower accuracy, indicating a capacity for processing multiple simultaneous components in signs. Spoken languages, in contrast, manifest greater complexity in temporal length. Hearing children’s pseudoword repetition still displays high levels of accuracy on disyllabic words, with complexity effects affecting only longer multisyllabic words. We conclude that the pseudosign repetition task is an informative tool for studies of signing children’s phonological development and that sheds light on potential modality effects for phonological development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9496651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94966512022-09-23 Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks Gu, Shengyun Chen Pichler, Deborah Kozak, L. Viola Lillo-Martin, Diane Front Psychol Psychology In this study, we conducted a pseudosign (nonce sign) repetition task with 22 children (mean age: 6;04) acquiring American Sign Language (ASL) as a first language (L1) from deaf parents. Thirty-nine pseudosigns with varying complexity were developed and organized into eight categories depending on number of hands, number of simultaneous movement types, and number of movement sequences. Pseudosigns also varied in handshape complexity. The children’s performance on the ASL pseudosign task improved with age, displaying relatively accurate (re)production of location and orientation, but much less accurate handshape and movement, a finding in line with real sign productions for both L1 and L2 signers. Handshapes with higher complexity were correlated with lower accuracy in the handshape parameter. We found main effects of sequential and simultaneous movement combinations on overall performance. Items with no movement sequence were produced with higher overall accuracy than those with a movement sequence. Items with two simultaneous movement types or a single movement type were produced with higher overall accuracy than those with three simultaneous movement types. Finally, number of hands did not affect the overall accuracy. Remarkably, movement sequences impose processing constraints on signing children whereas complex hands (two hands) and two simultaneous movement types do not significantly lower accuracy, indicating a capacity for processing multiple simultaneous components in signs. Spoken languages, in contrast, manifest greater complexity in temporal length. Hearing children’s pseudoword repetition still displays high levels of accuracy on disyllabic words, with complexity effects affecting only longer multisyllabic words. We conclude that the pseudosign repetition task is an informative tool for studies of signing children’s phonological development and that sheds light on potential modality effects for phonological development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9496651/ /pubmed/36160535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921047 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gu, Chen Pichler, Kozak and Lillo-Martin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Gu, Shengyun Chen Pichler, Deborah Kozak, L. Viola Lillo-Martin, Diane Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
title | Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
title_full | Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
title_fullStr | Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
title_short | Phonological development in American Sign Language-signing children: Insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
title_sort | phonological development in american sign language-signing children: insights from pseudosign repetition tasks |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gushengyun phonologicaldevelopmentinamericansignlanguagesigningchildreninsightsfrompseudosignrepetitiontasks AT chenpichlerdeborah phonologicaldevelopmentinamericansignlanguagesigningchildreninsightsfrompseudosignrepetitiontasks AT kozaklviola phonologicaldevelopmentinamericansignlanguagesigningchildreninsightsfrompseudosignrepetitiontasks AT lillomartindiane phonologicaldevelopmentinamericansignlanguagesigningchildreninsightsfrompseudosignrepetitiontasks |