Cargando…
Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress
We use the conservation of resources (COR) theory to propose a work-family model of stress in remote work. We propose that interruptions from family are a unique hindrance stressor, detrimental for the employee’s challenge and hindrance stress responses in remote work, which, in turn, have distinct...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09842-y |
_version_ | 1784797400004558848 |
---|---|
author | Perry, Sara Jansen Carlson, Dawn S. Kacmar, K. Michele Wan, Min (Maggie) Thompson, Merideth J. |
author_facet | Perry, Sara Jansen Carlson, Dawn S. Kacmar, K. Michele Wan, Min (Maggie) Thompson, Merideth J. |
author_sort | Perry, Sara Jansen |
collection | PubMed |
description | We use the conservation of resources (COR) theory to propose a work-family model of stress in remote work. We propose that interruptions from family are a unique hindrance stressor, detrimental for the employee’s challenge and hindrance stress responses in remote work, which, in turn, have distinct effects on resource-oriented attitudes and states of both the employee and spouse. Namely, we expect that both partners’ satisfaction with the work arrangement, employee engagement, and spouse family overload will be associated with the way the employee experiences stress in remote work (stress response). We also integrate the effort-recovery model to examine whether two types of breaks taken by employees while working remotely replenish resources lost through interruptions. Using a sample of 391 couples, we find support for all hypotheses that pertain to the employee. Findings involving the spouse support the primacy of the resource loss tenet in COR theory, in that these detrimental effects are significant in crossing over to the spouse via hindrance but are not significant via challenge stress. We discuss the implications of these findings, emphasizing that interruptions are harmful for both types of stress experienced by remote employees (i.e., lower “good” and higher “bad” stress responses), and interruptions appear to have far-reaching effects on both partners. However, choosing to use breaks for both nonwork goals and self-care can buffer these otherwise detrimental effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9510213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95102132022-09-26 Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress Perry, Sara Jansen Carlson, Dawn S. Kacmar, K. Michele Wan, Min (Maggie) Thompson, Merideth J. J Bus Psychol Original Paper We use the conservation of resources (COR) theory to propose a work-family model of stress in remote work. We propose that interruptions from family are a unique hindrance stressor, detrimental for the employee’s challenge and hindrance stress responses in remote work, which, in turn, have distinct effects on resource-oriented attitudes and states of both the employee and spouse. Namely, we expect that both partners’ satisfaction with the work arrangement, employee engagement, and spouse family overload will be associated with the way the employee experiences stress in remote work (stress response). We also integrate the effort-recovery model to examine whether two types of breaks taken by employees while working remotely replenish resources lost through interruptions. Using a sample of 391 couples, we find support for all hypotheses that pertain to the employee. Findings involving the spouse support the primacy of the resource loss tenet in COR theory, in that these detrimental effects are significant in crossing over to the spouse via hindrance but are not significant via challenge stress. We discuss the implications of these findings, emphasizing that interruptions are harmful for both types of stress experienced by remote employees (i.e., lower “good” and higher “bad” stress responses), and interruptions appear to have far-reaching effects on both partners. However, choosing to use breaks for both nonwork goals and self-care can buffer these otherwise detrimental effects. Springer US 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9510213/ /pubmed/36189432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09842-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Perry, Sara Jansen Carlson, Dawn S. Kacmar, K. Michele Wan, Min (Maggie) Thompson, Merideth J. Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress |
title | Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress |
title_full | Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress |
title_fullStr | Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress |
title_full_unstemmed | Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress |
title_short | Interruptions in Remote Work: a Resource-based Model of Work and Family Stress |
title_sort | interruptions in remote work: a resource-based model of work and family stress |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09842-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perrysarajansen interruptionsinremoteworkaresourcebasedmodelofworkandfamilystress AT carlsondawns interruptionsinremoteworkaresourcebasedmodelofworkandfamilystress AT kacmarkmichele interruptionsinremoteworkaresourcebasedmodelofworkandfamilystress AT wanminmaggie interruptionsinremoteworkaresourcebasedmodelofworkandfamilystress AT thompsonmeridethj interruptionsinremoteworkaresourcebasedmodelofworkandfamilystress |