Cargando…

Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System

OBJECTIVE: To explore and compare the cognitive processing weakness of children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid reading disabilities (RD) (ADHD+RD) and children with ADHD only using the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (DN:CAS). METHODS: Eighty-eight childre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zunwei, Feng, Junyan, Xue, Yang, Jia, Feiyong, Wang, Tiantian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.898348
_version_ 1784797507699605504
author Zhang, Zunwei
Feng, Junyan
Xue, Yang
Jia, Feiyong
Wang, Tiantian
author_facet Zhang, Zunwei
Feng, Junyan
Xue, Yang
Jia, Feiyong
Wang, Tiantian
author_sort Zhang, Zunwei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore and compare the cognitive processing weakness of children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid reading disabilities (RD) (ADHD+RD) and children with ADHD only using the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (DN:CAS). METHODS: Eighty-eight children with ADHD who visited the hospital for the first time from September 2021 to November 2021 and had a Full scale intelligence quotient (IQ) of ≥85 on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children revised in China (C-WISC) were selected (Age: 6–12 years; Grade: 2–6). Based on comorbidity with RD and the subtypes of ADHD (e.g., Inattention dominant type, ADHD-I, Hyperactivity/Impulse dominant type, ADHD-H and Combined type, ADHD-C), these children were divided into the ADHD+RD group (n = 30) and ADHD group (n = 58) as well as the corresponding subgroups. Clinical data on gender, age, grade, IQ scores, and DN:CAS processing scores were compared between both groups/subgroups. Spearman's correlation test was used for correlation analysis of results of interest. RESULTS: No differences in age, grade, male-to-female ratio, verbal IQ, performance IQ, and full scale IQ were observed between the ADHD+RD group and ADHD group as well as the corresponding subgroups (P > 0.05). Children in the ADHD-C+RD subgroup had lower scores in Planning processing of DN:CAS than those in the ADHD-C subgroup (P = 0.040). However, there were no significant difference between the ADHD-I+RD subgroup and ADHD-I subgroup in Planning scores of DN:CAS assessment; The grade of ADHD-C+RD and ADHD-I+RD subgroups were positively correlated with the Planning scores of DN: CAS (r = 0.599, P = 0.030 and r = 0.508, P = 0.044, respectively). The grade of ADHD-C subgroup was positively correlated with the Planning and Simultaneous processing scores of DN: CAS (r = 0.409, P = 0.042 and r = 0.406, P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that children of ADHD-C with comorbid RD have a more severe Planning processing weakness compared to children with ADHD-C only. Among the children of ADHD-C+RD, ADHD-I+RD and ADHD-C, such a Planning processing impairment may improve with increasing educational skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9510745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95107452022-09-27 Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System Zhang, Zunwei Feng, Junyan Xue, Yang Jia, Feiyong Wang, Tiantian Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: To explore and compare the cognitive processing weakness of children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid reading disabilities (RD) (ADHD+RD) and children with ADHD only using the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (DN:CAS). METHODS: Eighty-eight children with ADHD who visited the hospital for the first time from September 2021 to November 2021 and had a Full scale intelligence quotient (IQ) of ≥85 on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children revised in China (C-WISC) were selected (Age: 6–12 years; Grade: 2–6). Based on comorbidity with RD and the subtypes of ADHD (e.g., Inattention dominant type, ADHD-I, Hyperactivity/Impulse dominant type, ADHD-H and Combined type, ADHD-C), these children were divided into the ADHD+RD group (n = 30) and ADHD group (n = 58) as well as the corresponding subgroups. Clinical data on gender, age, grade, IQ scores, and DN:CAS processing scores were compared between both groups/subgroups. Spearman's correlation test was used for correlation analysis of results of interest. RESULTS: No differences in age, grade, male-to-female ratio, verbal IQ, performance IQ, and full scale IQ were observed between the ADHD+RD group and ADHD group as well as the corresponding subgroups (P > 0.05). Children in the ADHD-C+RD subgroup had lower scores in Planning processing of DN:CAS than those in the ADHD-C subgroup (P = 0.040). However, there were no significant difference between the ADHD-I+RD subgroup and ADHD-I subgroup in Planning scores of DN:CAS assessment; The grade of ADHD-C+RD and ADHD-I+RD subgroups were positively correlated with the Planning scores of DN: CAS (r = 0.599, P = 0.030 and r = 0.508, P = 0.044, respectively). The grade of ADHD-C subgroup was positively correlated with the Planning and Simultaneous processing scores of DN: CAS (r = 0.409, P = 0.042 and r = 0.406, P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that children of ADHD-C with comorbid RD have a more severe Planning processing weakness compared to children with ADHD-C only. Among the children of ADHD-C+RD, ADHD-I+RD and ADHD-C, such a Planning processing impairment may improve with increasing educational skills. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9510745/ /pubmed/36172393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.898348 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Feng, Xue, Jia and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Zhang, Zunwei
Feng, Junyan
Xue, Yang
Jia, Feiyong
Wang, Tiantian
Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System
title Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System
title_full Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System
title_fullStr Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System
title_full_unstemmed Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System
title_short Planning processing in ADHD with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in ADHD: Based on Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System
title_sort planning processing in adhd with comorbid reading disabilities is worse than in adhd: based on das-naglieri cognitive assessment system
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36172393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.898348
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzunwei planningprocessinginadhdwithcomorbidreadingdisabilitiesisworsethaninadhdbasedondasnagliericognitiveassessmentsystem
AT fengjunyan planningprocessinginadhdwithcomorbidreadingdisabilitiesisworsethaninadhdbasedondasnagliericognitiveassessmentsystem
AT xueyang planningprocessinginadhdwithcomorbidreadingdisabilitiesisworsethaninadhdbasedondasnagliericognitiveassessmentsystem
AT jiafeiyong planningprocessinginadhdwithcomorbidreadingdisabilitiesisworsethaninadhdbasedondasnagliericognitiveassessmentsystem
AT wangtiantian planningprocessinginadhdwithcomorbidreadingdisabilitiesisworsethaninadhdbasedondasnagliericognitiveassessmentsystem