Cargando…

Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment

The effects of the preparation method (mixing, chemical polymerization, or ultrasound treatment) on the structure and functional properties of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (SPI-EGCG) complexes were examined. The mixing treated SPI-EGCG samples (M−SE) were non-covalently linked,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geng, Mengjie, Feng, Xumei, Yang, Haodong, Wu, Xixi, Li, Lijia, Li, Yang, Teng, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106172
_version_ 1784798518942105600
author Geng, Mengjie
Feng, Xumei
Yang, Haodong
Wu, Xixi
Li, Lijia
Li, Yang
Teng, Fei
author_facet Geng, Mengjie
Feng, Xumei
Yang, Haodong
Wu, Xixi
Li, Lijia
Li, Yang
Teng, Fei
author_sort Geng, Mengjie
collection PubMed
description The effects of the preparation method (mixing, chemical polymerization, or ultrasound treatment) on the structure and functional properties of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (SPI-EGCG) complexes were examined. The mixing treated SPI-EGCG samples (M−SE) were non-covalently linked, while the chemical polymerization and ultrasound treated SPI-EGCG samples (C-SE and U-SE, respectively) were bound covalently. The covalent binding of EGCG with protein improved the molecular weight and changed the structures of the SPI by decreasing the α-helix content. Moreover, U-SE samples had the lowest particle size (188.70 ± 33.40 nm), the highest zeta potential (−27.82 ± 0.53 mV), and the highest polyphenol binding rate (59.84 ± 2.34 %) compared with mixing and chemical polymerization-treated samples. Furthermore, adding EGCG enhanced the antioxidant activity of SPI and U-SE revealed the highest DPPH (84.84 ± 1.34 %) and ABTS (88.89 ± 1.23 %) values. In conclusion, the SPI-EGCG complexes prepared by ultrasound formed a more stable composite system with stronger antioxidant capacity, indicating that ultrasound technology may have potential applications in the preparation of protein-polyphenol complexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9515592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95155922022-09-29 Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment Geng, Mengjie Feng, Xumei Yang, Haodong Wu, Xixi Li, Lijia Li, Yang Teng, Fei Ultrason Sonochem Short Communication The effects of the preparation method (mixing, chemical polymerization, or ultrasound treatment) on the structure and functional properties of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (SPI-EGCG) complexes were examined. The mixing treated SPI-EGCG samples (M−SE) were non-covalently linked, while the chemical polymerization and ultrasound treated SPI-EGCG samples (C-SE and U-SE, respectively) were bound covalently. The covalent binding of EGCG with protein improved the molecular weight and changed the structures of the SPI by decreasing the α-helix content. Moreover, U-SE samples had the lowest particle size (188.70 ± 33.40 nm), the highest zeta potential (−27.82 ± 0.53 mV), and the highest polyphenol binding rate (59.84 ± 2.34 %) compared with mixing and chemical polymerization-treated samples. Furthermore, adding EGCG enhanced the antioxidant activity of SPI and U-SE revealed the highest DPPH (84.84 ± 1.34 %) and ABTS (88.89 ± 1.23 %) values. In conclusion, the SPI-EGCG complexes prepared by ultrasound formed a more stable composite system with stronger antioxidant capacity, indicating that ultrasound technology may have potential applications in the preparation of protein-polyphenol complexes. Elsevier 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9515592/ /pubmed/36162220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106172 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Geng, Mengjie
Feng, Xumei
Yang, Haodong
Wu, Xixi
Li, Lijia
Li, Yang
Teng, Fei
Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
title Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
title_full Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
title_fullStr Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
title_short Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
title_sort comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106172
work_keys_str_mv AT gengmengjie comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment
AT fengxumei comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment
AT yanghaodong comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment
AT wuxixi comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment
AT lilijia comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment
AT liyang comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment
AT tengfei comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment