Cargando…
Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment
The effects of the preparation method (mixing, chemical polymerization, or ultrasound treatment) on the structure and functional properties of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (SPI-EGCG) complexes were examined. The mixing treated SPI-EGCG samples (M−SE) were non-covalently linked,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106172 |
_version_ | 1784798518942105600 |
---|---|
author | Geng, Mengjie Feng, Xumei Yang, Haodong Wu, Xixi Li, Lijia Li, Yang Teng, Fei |
author_facet | Geng, Mengjie Feng, Xumei Yang, Haodong Wu, Xixi Li, Lijia Li, Yang Teng, Fei |
author_sort | Geng, Mengjie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effects of the preparation method (mixing, chemical polymerization, or ultrasound treatment) on the structure and functional properties of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (SPI-EGCG) complexes were examined. The mixing treated SPI-EGCG samples (M−SE) were non-covalently linked, while the chemical polymerization and ultrasound treated SPI-EGCG samples (C-SE and U-SE, respectively) were bound covalently. The covalent binding of EGCG with protein improved the molecular weight and changed the structures of the SPI by decreasing the α-helix content. Moreover, U-SE samples had the lowest particle size (188.70 ± 33.40 nm), the highest zeta potential (−27.82 ± 0.53 mV), and the highest polyphenol binding rate (59.84 ± 2.34 %) compared with mixing and chemical polymerization-treated samples. Furthermore, adding EGCG enhanced the antioxidant activity of SPI and U-SE revealed the highest DPPH (84.84 ± 1.34 %) and ABTS (88.89 ± 1.23 %) values. In conclusion, the SPI-EGCG complexes prepared by ultrasound formed a more stable composite system with stronger antioxidant capacity, indicating that ultrasound technology may have potential applications in the preparation of protein-polyphenol complexes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9515592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95155922022-09-29 Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment Geng, Mengjie Feng, Xumei Yang, Haodong Wu, Xixi Li, Lijia Li, Yang Teng, Fei Ultrason Sonochem Short Communication The effects of the preparation method (mixing, chemical polymerization, or ultrasound treatment) on the structure and functional properties of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (SPI-EGCG) complexes were examined. The mixing treated SPI-EGCG samples (M−SE) were non-covalently linked, while the chemical polymerization and ultrasound treated SPI-EGCG samples (C-SE and U-SE, respectively) were bound covalently. The covalent binding of EGCG with protein improved the molecular weight and changed the structures of the SPI by decreasing the α-helix content. Moreover, U-SE samples had the lowest particle size (188.70 ± 33.40 nm), the highest zeta potential (−27.82 ± 0.53 mV), and the highest polyphenol binding rate (59.84 ± 2.34 %) compared with mixing and chemical polymerization-treated samples. Furthermore, adding EGCG enhanced the antioxidant activity of SPI and U-SE revealed the highest DPPH (84.84 ± 1.34 %) and ABTS (88.89 ± 1.23 %) values. In conclusion, the SPI-EGCG complexes prepared by ultrasound formed a more stable composite system with stronger antioxidant capacity, indicating that ultrasound technology may have potential applications in the preparation of protein-polyphenol complexes. Elsevier 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9515592/ /pubmed/36162220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106172 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Geng, Mengjie Feng, Xumei Yang, Haodong Wu, Xixi Li, Lijia Li, Yang Teng, Fei Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
title | Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
title_full | Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
title_fullStr | Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
title_short | Comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
title_sort | comparison of soy protein isolate-(–)-epigallocatechin gallate complexes prepared by mixing, chemical polymerization, and ultrasound treatment |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gengmengjie comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment AT fengxumei comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment AT yanghaodong comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment AT wuxixi comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment AT lilijia comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment AT liyang comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment AT tengfei comparisonofsoyproteinisolateepigallocatechingallatecomplexespreparedbymixingchemicalpolymerizationandultrasoundtreatment |