Cargando…

Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakka, Thejeswar, Goenka, Luxitaa, Dubashi, Biswajit, Kayal, Smita, Mathaiyan, Jayanthi, Barathi, Deepak, Krishnamoorthy, Narendran, Thumaty, Divya Bala, Dahagama, Sindhu, Ganesan, Prasanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6
_version_ 1784800065555005440
author Nakka, Thejeswar
Goenka, Luxitaa
Dubashi, Biswajit
Kayal, Smita
Mathaiyan, Jayanthi
Barathi, Deepak
Krishnamoorthy, Narendran
Thumaty, Divya Bala
Dahagama, Sindhu
Ganesan, Prasanth
author_facet Nakka, Thejeswar
Goenka, Luxitaa
Dubashi, Biswajit
Kayal, Smita
Mathaiyan, Jayanthi
Barathi, Deepak
Krishnamoorthy, Narendran
Thumaty, Divya Bala
Dahagama, Sindhu
Ganesan, Prasanth
author_sort Nakka, Thejeswar
collection PubMed
description Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0–3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1–D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4–D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45–59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1–3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9522437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95224372022-09-30 Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Nakka, Thejeswar Goenka, Luxitaa Dubashi, Biswajit Kayal, Smita Mathaiyan, Jayanthi Barathi, Deepak Krishnamoorthy, Narendran Thumaty, Divya Bala Dahagama, Sindhu Ganesan, Prasanth Med Oncol Short Communication Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0–3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1–D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4–D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45–59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1–3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6. Springer US 2022-09-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9522437/ /pubmed/36175588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Nakka, Thejeswar
Goenka, Luxitaa
Dubashi, Biswajit
Kayal, Smita
Mathaiyan, Jayanthi
Barathi, Deepak
Krishnamoorthy, Narendran
Thumaty, Divya Bala
Dahagama, Sindhu
Ganesan, Prasanth
Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
title Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
title_full Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
title_short Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
title_sort phase ii study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nakkathejeswar phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT goenkaluxitaa phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT dubashibiswajit phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT kayalsmita phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT mathaiyanjayanthi phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT barathideepak phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT krishnamoorthynarendran phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT thumatydivyabala phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT dahagamasindhu phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer
AT ganesanprasanth phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer