Cargando…
Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6 |
_version_ | 1784800065555005440 |
---|---|
author | Nakka, Thejeswar Goenka, Luxitaa Dubashi, Biswajit Kayal, Smita Mathaiyan, Jayanthi Barathi, Deepak Krishnamoorthy, Narendran Thumaty, Divya Bala Dahagama, Sindhu Ganesan, Prasanth |
author_facet | Nakka, Thejeswar Goenka, Luxitaa Dubashi, Biswajit Kayal, Smita Mathaiyan, Jayanthi Barathi, Deepak Krishnamoorthy, Narendran Thumaty, Divya Bala Dahagama, Sindhu Ganesan, Prasanth |
author_sort | Nakka, Thejeswar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0–3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1–D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4–D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45–59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1–3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9522437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95224372022-09-30 Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Nakka, Thejeswar Goenka, Luxitaa Dubashi, Biswajit Kayal, Smita Mathaiyan, Jayanthi Barathi, Deepak Krishnamoorthy, Narendran Thumaty, Divya Bala Dahagama, Sindhu Ganesan, Prasanth Med Oncol Short Communication Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0–3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1–D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4–D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45–59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1–3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6. Springer US 2022-09-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9522437/ /pubmed/36175588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Nakka, Thejeswar Goenka, Luxitaa Dubashi, Biswajit Kayal, Smita Mathaiyan, Jayanthi Barathi, Deepak Krishnamoorthy, Narendran Thumaty, Divya Bala Dahagama, Sindhu Ganesan, Prasanth Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
title | Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
title_full | Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
title_fullStr | Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
title_short | Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
title_sort | phase ii study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9522437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01833-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakkathejeswar phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT goenkaluxitaa phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT dubashibiswajit phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT kayalsmita phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT mathaiyanjayanthi phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT barathideepak phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT krishnamoorthynarendran phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT thumatydivyabala phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT dahagamasindhu phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer AT ganesanprasanth phaseiistudyofsodiumvalproateincombinationwithoraletoposideinplatinumresistantovariancancer |