Cargando…

Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits

BACKGROUND: Considering relatives’ health history in logistic regression for case–control genome-wide association studies (CC-GWAS) may provide new information that increases accuracy and power to detect disease associated genetic variants. We conducted simulations and analyzed type 2 diabetes (T2D)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yixin, Meigs, James B., Liu, Ching-Ti, Dupuis, Josée, Sarnowski, Chloé
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08897-8
_version_ 1784800852716814336
author Zhang, Yixin
Meigs, James B.
Liu, Ching-Ti
Dupuis, Josée
Sarnowski, Chloé
author_facet Zhang, Yixin
Meigs, James B.
Liu, Ching-Ti
Dupuis, Josée
Sarnowski, Chloé
author_sort Zhang, Yixin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Considering relatives’ health history in logistic regression for case–control genome-wide association studies (CC-GWAS) may provide new information that increases accuracy and power to detect disease associated genetic variants. We conducted simulations and analyzed type 2 diabetes (T2D) data from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) to compare two methods, liability threshold model conditional on both case–control status and family history (LT-FH) and Fam-meta, which incorporate family history into CC-GWAS. RESULTS: In our simulation scenario of trait with modest T2D heritability (h(2) = 0.28), variant minor allele frequency ranging from 1% to 50%, and 1% of phenotype variance explained by the genetic variants, Fam-meta had the highest overall power, while both methods incorporating family history were more powerful than CC-GWAS. All three methods had controlled type I error rates, while LT-FH was the most conservative with a lower-than-expected error rate. In addition, we observed a substantial increase in power of the two familial history methods compared to CC-GWAS when the prevalence of the phenotype increased with age. Furthermore, we showed that, when only the phenotypes of more distant relatives were available, Fam-meta still remained more powerful than CC-GWAS, confirming that leveraging disease history of both close and distant relatives can increase power of association analyses. Using FHS data, we confirmed the well-known association of TCF7L2 region with T2D at the genome-wide threshold of P-value < 5 × 10(–8), and both familial history methods increased the significance of the region compared to CC-GWAS. We identified two loci at 5q35 (ADAMTS2) and 5q23 (PRR16), not previously reported for T2D using CC-GWAS and Fam-meta; both genes play a role in cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, CC-GWAS detected one more significant locus at 13q31 (GPC6) reported associated with T2D-related traits. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LT-FH and Fam-meta had higher power than CC-GWAS in simulations, especially using phenotypes that were more prevalent in older age groups, and both methods detected known genetic variants with lower P-values in real data application, highlighting the benefits of including family history in genetic association studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08897-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9526325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95263252022-10-02 Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits Zhang, Yixin Meigs, James B. Liu, Ching-Ti Dupuis, Josée Sarnowski, Chloé BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Considering relatives’ health history in logistic regression for case–control genome-wide association studies (CC-GWAS) may provide new information that increases accuracy and power to detect disease associated genetic variants. We conducted simulations and analyzed type 2 diabetes (T2D) data from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) to compare two methods, liability threshold model conditional on both case–control status and family history (LT-FH) and Fam-meta, which incorporate family history into CC-GWAS. RESULTS: In our simulation scenario of trait with modest T2D heritability (h(2) = 0.28), variant minor allele frequency ranging from 1% to 50%, and 1% of phenotype variance explained by the genetic variants, Fam-meta had the highest overall power, while both methods incorporating family history were more powerful than CC-GWAS. All three methods had controlled type I error rates, while LT-FH was the most conservative with a lower-than-expected error rate. In addition, we observed a substantial increase in power of the two familial history methods compared to CC-GWAS when the prevalence of the phenotype increased with age. Furthermore, we showed that, when only the phenotypes of more distant relatives were available, Fam-meta still remained more powerful than CC-GWAS, confirming that leveraging disease history of both close and distant relatives can increase power of association analyses. Using FHS data, we confirmed the well-known association of TCF7L2 region with T2D at the genome-wide threshold of P-value < 5 × 10(–8), and both familial history methods increased the significance of the region compared to CC-GWAS. We identified two loci at 5q35 (ADAMTS2) and 5q23 (PRR16), not previously reported for T2D using CC-GWAS and Fam-meta; both genes play a role in cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, CC-GWAS detected one more significant locus at 13q31 (GPC6) reported associated with T2D-related traits. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LT-FH and Fam-meta had higher power than CC-GWAS in simulations, especially using phenotypes that were more prevalent in older age groups, and both methods detected known genetic variants with lower P-values in real data application, highlighting the benefits of including family history in genetic association studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08897-8. BioMed Central 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9526325/ /pubmed/36182916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08897-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Yixin
Meigs, James B.
Liu, Ching-Ti
Dupuis, Josée
Sarnowski, Chloé
Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
title Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
title_full Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
title_fullStr Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
title_short Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
title_sort leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36182916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08897-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyixin leveragingfamilyhistoryingeneticassociationanalysesofbinarytraits
AT meigsjamesb leveragingfamilyhistoryingeneticassociationanalysesofbinarytraits
AT liuchingti leveragingfamilyhistoryingeneticassociationanalysesofbinarytraits
AT dupuisjosee leveragingfamilyhistoryingeneticassociationanalysesofbinarytraits
AT sarnowskichloe leveragingfamilyhistoryingeneticassociationanalysesofbinarytraits