Cargando…
Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing
One of the most widely used techniques in microbiota research is 16S-rRNA-sequencing. Several laboratory processes have been shown to impact sequencing results, especially in low biomass samples. Low biomass samples are prone to off-target amplification, where instead of bacterial DNA, host DNA is e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20573-1 |
_version_ | 1784800940285493248 |
---|---|
author | Odendaal, Mari-Lee Groot, James A. Hasrat, Raiza Chu, Mei Ling J. N. Franz, Eelco Bogaert, Debby Bosch, Thijs de Steenhuijsen Piters, Wouter A. A. |
author_facet | Odendaal, Mari-Lee Groot, James A. Hasrat, Raiza Chu, Mei Ling J. N. Franz, Eelco Bogaert, Debby Bosch, Thijs de Steenhuijsen Piters, Wouter A. A. |
author_sort | Odendaal, Mari-Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the most widely used techniques in microbiota research is 16S-rRNA-sequencing. Several laboratory processes have been shown to impact sequencing results, especially in low biomass samples. Low biomass samples are prone to off-target amplification, where instead of bacterial DNA, host DNA is erroneously amplified. Knowledge on the laboratory processes influencing off-target amplification and detection is however scarce. We here expand on previous findings by demonstrating that off-target amplification is not limited to invasive biopsy samples, but is also an issue in low bacterial biomass respiratory (mucosal) samples, especially when below 0.3 pg/μL. We show that off-target amplification can partly be mitigated by using gel-based library purification methods. Importantly, we report a higher off-target amplicon detection rate when using MiSeq reagent kit v3 compared to v2 (mean 13.3% vs 0.1% off-target reads/sample, respectively), possibly as a result of differences in reagents or sequencing recipes. However, since after bioinformatic removal of off-target reads, MiSeq reagent kit v3 still results in a twofold higher number of reads when compared to v2, v3 is still preferred over v2. Together, these results add to the growing knowledge base on off-target amplification and detection, allowing researchers to anticipate this problem in 16S-rRNA-based microbiome studies involving low biomass samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9526709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95267092022-10-03 Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing Odendaal, Mari-Lee Groot, James A. Hasrat, Raiza Chu, Mei Ling J. N. Franz, Eelco Bogaert, Debby Bosch, Thijs de Steenhuijsen Piters, Wouter A. A. Sci Rep Article One of the most widely used techniques in microbiota research is 16S-rRNA-sequencing. Several laboratory processes have been shown to impact sequencing results, especially in low biomass samples. Low biomass samples are prone to off-target amplification, where instead of bacterial DNA, host DNA is erroneously amplified. Knowledge on the laboratory processes influencing off-target amplification and detection is however scarce. We here expand on previous findings by demonstrating that off-target amplification is not limited to invasive biopsy samples, but is also an issue in low bacterial biomass respiratory (mucosal) samples, especially when below 0.3 pg/μL. We show that off-target amplification can partly be mitigated by using gel-based library purification methods. Importantly, we report a higher off-target amplicon detection rate when using MiSeq reagent kit v3 compared to v2 (mean 13.3% vs 0.1% off-target reads/sample, respectively), possibly as a result of differences in reagents or sequencing recipes. However, since after bioinformatic removal of off-target reads, MiSeq reagent kit v3 still results in a twofold higher number of reads when compared to v2, v3 is still preferred over v2. Together, these results add to the growing knowledge base on off-target amplification and detection, allowing researchers to anticipate this problem in 16S-rRNA-based microbiome studies involving low biomass samples. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9526709/ /pubmed/36183009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20573-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Odendaal, Mari-Lee Groot, James A. Hasrat, Raiza Chu, Mei Ling J. N. Franz, Eelco Bogaert, Debby Bosch, Thijs de Steenhuijsen Piters, Wouter A. A. Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing |
title | Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing |
title_full | Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing |
title_fullStr | Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing |
title_short | Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing |
title_sort | higher off-target amplicon detection rate in miseq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16s-rrna-sequencing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20573-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odendaalmarilee higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT grootjamesa higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT hasratraiza higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT chumeilingjn higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT franzeelco higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT bogaertdebby higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT boschthijs higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing AT desteenhuijsenpiterswouteraa higherofftargetamplicondetectionrateinmiseqv3comparedtov2reagentkitsinthecontextof16srrnasequencing |