Cargando…
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate dental students' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking ability by key feature test and “diagnostic thinking inventory” questionnaire. METHODS: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants consisted of 61 senior de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1085326 |
_version_ | 1784801516320718848 |
---|---|
author | Owlia, Fatemeh Keshmiri, Fatemeh Kazemipoor, Maryam Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh |
author_facet | Owlia, Fatemeh Keshmiri, Fatemeh Kazemipoor, Maryam Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh |
author_sort | Owlia, Fatemeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate dental students' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking ability by key feature test and “diagnostic thinking inventory” questionnaire. METHODS: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants consisted of 61 senior dental students. Clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking were assessed by key feature tests and the “diagnostic thinking inventory” “DTI” questionnaire, respectively. The “diagnostic thinking inventory” was developed by Bordage et al. in France and consisted of 41 questions on a 6-point Likert scale. The satisfaction of students was assessed through a 10-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS 19 with descriptive tests (mean, SD, and percentage), student independent T-test, and Pearson correlation. The significance level was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean scores of the key feature test were 56.55 ± 7.80. Diagnostic thinking scores of learners were reported in diagnostic thinking 136.47 ± 16.45, flexibility in thinking 72.22 ± 11.15, and structure of memory 64.24 ± 7.84. The difference in students' scores in flexibility in thinking was significantly higher among male students than female students. (p-value = 0.04). The students' satisfaction scores were 3.53 ± 0.52, which showed relative satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The participants' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking skills were reported at a low level. This issue emphasizes the need for training to enhance diagnostic thinking and clinical reasoning in dental education. Formative evaluation and reform of the educational programs of this course should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9529532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95295322022-10-04 Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students Owlia, Fatemeh Keshmiri, Fatemeh Kazemipoor, Maryam Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Int J Dent Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate dental students' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking ability by key feature test and “diagnostic thinking inventory” questionnaire. METHODS: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants consisted of 61 senior dental students. Clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking were assessed by key feature tests and the “diagnostic thinking inventory” “DTI” questionnaire, respectively. The “diagnostic thinking inventory” was developed by Bordage et al. in France and consisted of 41 questions on a 6-point Likert scale. The satisfaction of students was assessed through a 10-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS 19 with descriptive tests (mean, SD, and percentage), student independent T-test, and Pearson correlation. The significance level was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean scores of the key feature test were 56.55 ± 7.80. Diagnostic thinking scores of learners were reported in diagnostic thinking 136.47 ± 16.45, flexibility in thinking 72.22 ± 11.15, and structure of memory 64.24 ± 7.84. The difference in students' scores in flexibility in thinking was significantly higher among male students than female students. (p-value = 0.04). The students' satisfaction scores were 3.53 ± 0.52, which showed relative satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The participants' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking skills were reported at a low level. This issue emphasizes the need for training to enhance diagnostic thinking and clinical reasoning in dental education. Formative evaluation and reform of the educational programs of this course should be considered. Hindawi 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9529532/ /pubmed/36199675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1085326 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fatemeh Owlia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Owlia, Fatemeh Keshmiri, Fatemeh Kazemipoor, Maryam Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students |
title | Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students |
title_full | Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students |
title_short | Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students |
title_sort | assessment of clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking among dental students |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1085326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owliafatemeh assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents AT keshmirifatemeh assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents AT kazemipoormaryam assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents AT rashidimaybodifahimeh assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents |