Cargando…

Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate dental students' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking ability by key feature test and “diagnostic thinking inventory” questionnaire. METHODS: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants consisted of 61 senior de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owlia, Fatemeh, Keshmiri, Fatemeh, Kazemipoor, Maryam, Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1085326
_version_ 1784801516320718848
author Owlia, Fatemeh
Keshmiri, Fatemeh
Kazemipoor, Maryam
Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
author_facet Owlia, Fatemeh
Keshmiri, Fatemeh
Kazemipoor, Maryam
Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
author_sort Owlia, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate dental students' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking ability by key feature test and “diagnostic thinking inventory” questionnaire. METHODS: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants consisted of 61 senior dental students. Clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking were assessed by key feature tests and the “diagnostic thinking inventory” “DTI” questionnaire, respectively. The “diagnostic thinking inventory” was developed by Bordage et al. in France and consisted of 41 questions on a 6-point Likert scale. The satisfaction of students was assessed through a 10-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS 19 with descriptive tests (mean, SD, and percentage), student independent T-test, and Pearson correlation. The significance level was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean scores of the key feature test were 56.55 ± 7.80. Diagnostic thinking scores of learners were reported in diagnostic thinking 136.47 ± 16.45, flexibility in thinking 72.22 ± 11.15, and structure of memory 64.24 ± 7.84. The difference in students' scores in flexibility in thinking was significantly higher among male students than female students. (p-value = 0.04). The students' satisfaction scores were 3.53 ± 0.52, which showed relative satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The participants' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking skills were reported at a low level. This issue emphasizes the need for training to enhance diagnostic thinking and clinical reasoning in dental education. Formative evaluation and reform of the educational programs of this course should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95295322022-10-04 Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students Owlia, Fatemeh Keshmiri, Fatemeh Kazemipoor, Maryam Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Int J Dent Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate dental students' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking ability by key feature test and “diagnostic thinking inventory” questionnaire. METHODS: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants consisted of 61 senior dental students. Clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking were assessed by key feature tests and the “diagnostic thinking inventory” “DTI” questionnaire, respectively. The “diagnostic thinking inventory” was developed by Bordage et al. in France and consisted of 41 questions on a 6-point Likert scale. The satisfaction of students was assessed through a 10-item questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS 19 with descriptive tests (mean, SD, and percentage), student independent T-test, and Pearson correlation. The significance level was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean scores of the key feature test were 56.55 ± 7.80. Diagnostic thinking scores of learners were reported in diagnostic thinking 136.47 ± 16.45, flexibility in thinking 72.22 ± 11.15, and structure of memory 64.24 ± 7.84. The difference in students' scores in flexibility in thinking was significantly higher among male students than female students. (p-value = 0.04). The students' satisfaction scores were 3.53 ± 0.52, which showed relative satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The participants' clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking skills were reported at a low level. This issue emphasizes the need for training to enhance diagnostic thinking and clinical reasoning in dental education. Formative evaluation and reform of the educational programs of this course should be considered. Hindawi 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9529532/ /pubmed/36199675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1085326 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fatemeh Owlia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Owlia, Fatemeh
Keshmiri, Fatemeh
Kazemipoor, Maryam
Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
title Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
title_full Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
title_fullStr Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
title_short Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Thinking among Dental Students
title_sort assessment of clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking among dental students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1085326
work_keys_str_mv AT owliafatemeh assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents
AT keshmirifatemeh assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents
AT kazemipoormaryam assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents
AT rashidimaybodifahimeh assessmentofclinicalreasoninganddiagnosticthinkingamongdentalstudents