Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VO(2max) responses to sprint interval vs. continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether studies comparing maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) response to sprint interval training (SIT) vs. moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) are associated with a high risk of bias and poor reporting quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonafiglia, Jacob T., Islam, Hashim, Preobrazenski, Nicholas, Gurd, Brendon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai University of Sport 2022
Materias:
Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.03.005

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.03.005

Ejemplares similares