Cargando…

Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition

In vitro signals indicate that ziritaxestat is a weak cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor and inducer. Therefore, potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with oral contraceptives were examined at a time when ziritaxestat was under development for treatment of fibrotic diseases. This open‐label, cros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helmer, Eric, Karimian, Negin, Van Assche, Karen, Seghers, Ineke, Le Tallec, Sandrine, Cherala, Ganesh, Scott, Graham, Namour, Florence S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35713964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2689
_version_ 1784803718933250048
author Helmer, Eric
Karimian, Negin
Van Assche, Karen
Seghers, Ineke
Le Tallec, Sandrine
Cherala, Ganesh
Scott, Graham
Namour, Florence S.
author_facet Helmer, Eric
Karimian, Negin
Van Assche, Karen
Seghers, Ineke
Le Tallec, Sandrine
Cherala, Ganesh
Scott, Graham
Namour, Florence S.
author_sort Helmer, Eric
collection PubMed
description In vitro signals indicate that ziritaxestat is a weak cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor and inducer. Therefore, potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with oral contraceptives were examined at a time when ziritaxestat was under development for treatment of fibrotic diseases. This open‐label, crossover (fixed sequence) DDI study enrolled healthy, nonpregnant women aged 18–65 years (n = 15) who were using highly effective contraception, such as a nonhormonal intrauterine device, bilateral tubal occlusion, or sexual abstinence. A single dose of oral contraceptive (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP)) was administered on days 1, 8, and 18, and ziritaxestat 600 mg once daily was administered from days 8 to 23. Co‐administration resulted in a 2.8‐fold and 2.4‐fold increase in EE maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0–inf)), respectively (day 18 vs. day 1). DRSP C(max) and AUC(0–inf) increased by 1.1‐fold and 1.2‐fold, respectively. DRSP is a CYP3A4 substrate, meaning increased EE exposure with ziritaxestat was not due to CYP3A4 inhibition. Ziritaxestat inhibition of EE glucuronidation and sulfation was quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in day 1 and day 18 plasma samples after EE conjugate hydrolysis. The ratio of EE AUC from time of administration up to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(last)) with/without hydrolysis by arylsulfatase was substantially lower on day 18 vs. day 1, suggesting ziritaxestat is a potent inhibitor of sulfation; EE glucuronidation was largely unaffected by ziritaxestat. In vitro assessment confirmed ziritaxestat is a potent inhibitor of sulfotransferase family 1E member 1 (half‐maximal inhibitory concentration < 0.8 μM). These findings highlight the importance of assessing enzymes other than CYP3A4 when investigating potential DDIs with oral contraceptives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95404972022-10-14 Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition Helmer, Eric Karimian, Negin Van Assche, Karen Seghers, Ineke Le Tallec, Sandrine Cherala, Ganesh Scott, Graham Namour, Florence S. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research In vitro signals indicate that ziritaxestat is a weak cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor and inducer. Therefore, potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with oral contraceptives were examined at a time when ziritaxestat was under development for treatment of fibrotic diseases. This open‐label, crossover (fixed sequence) DDI study enrolled healthy, nonpregnant women aged 18–65 years (n = 15) who were using highly effective contraception, such as a nonhormonal intrauterine device, bilateral tubal occlusion, or sexual abstinence. A single dose of oral contraceptive (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP)) was administered on days 1, 8, and 18, and ziritaxestat 600 mg once daily was administered from days 8 to 23. Co‐administration resulted in a 2.8‐fold and 2.4‐fold increase in EE maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0–inf)), respectively (day 18 vs. day 1). DRSP C(max) and AUC(0–inf) increased by 1.1‐fold and 1.2‐fold, respectively. DRSP is a CYP3A4 substrate, meaning increased EE exposure with ziritaxestat was not due to CYP3A4 inhibition. Ziritaxestat inhibition of EE glucuronidation and sulfation was quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in day 1 and day 18 plasma samples after EE conjugate hydrolysis. The ratio of EE AUC from time of administration up to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(last)) with/without hydrolysis by arylsulfatase was substantially lower on day 18 vs. day 1, suggesting ziritaxestat is a potent inhibitor of sulfation; EE glucuronidation was largely unaffected by ziritaxestat. In vitro assessment confirmed ziritaxestat is a potent inhibitor of sulfotransferase family 1E member 1 (half‐maximal inhibitory concentration < 0.8 μM). These findings highlight the importance of assessing enzymes other than CYP3A4 when investigating potential DDIs with oral contraceptives. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9540497/ /pubmed/35713964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2689 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Helmer, Eric
Karimian, Negin
Van Assche, Karen
Seghers, Ineke
Le Tallec, Sandrine
Cherala, Ganesh
Scott, Graham
Namour, Florence S.
Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition
title Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition
title_full Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition
title_fullStr Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition
title_short Ziritaxestat Drug–Drug Interaction with Oral Contraceptives: Role of SULT1E1 Inhibition
title_sort ziritaxestat drug–drug interaction with oral contraceptives: role of sult1e1 inhibition
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35713964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2689
work_keys_str_mv AT helmereric ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT karimiannegin ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT vanasschekaren ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT seghersineke ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT letallecsandrine ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT cheralaganesh ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT scottgraham ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition
AT namourflorences ziritaxestatdrugdruginteractionwithoralcontraceptivesroleofsult1e1inhibition