Cargando…

NAD+ deficiency in human congenital malformations and miscarriage: A new model of pleiotropy

Pleiotropy is defined as the phenomenon of a single gene locus influencing two or more distinct phenotypic traits. However, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) deficiency through diet alone can cause multiple or single malformations in mice. Additionally, humans with decreased NAD+ production d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mark, Paul R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.62764
Descripción
Sumario:Pleiotropy is defined as the phenomenon of a single gene locus influencing two or more distinct phenotypic traits. However, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) deficiency through diet alone can cause multiple or single malformations in mice. Additionally, humans with decreased NAD+ production due to changes in pathway genes display similar malformations. Here, I hypothesize NAD+ deficiency as a pleiotropic mechanism for multiple malformation conditions, including limb‐body wall complex (LBWC), pentalogy of Cantrell (POC), omphalocele‐exstrophy‐imperforate anus‐spinal defects (OEIS) complex, vertebral‐anal‐cardiac‐tracheoesophageal fistula‐renal‐limb (VACTERL) association (hereafter VACTERL), oculoauriculovertebral spectrum (OAVS), Mullerian duct aplasia‐renal anomalies‐cervicothoracic somite dysplasia (MURCS), sirenomelia, and urorectal septum malformation (URSM) sequence, along with miscarriages and other forms of congenital malformation. The term Congenital NAD Deficiency Disorder (CNDD) could be considered for patients with these malformations; however, it is important to emphasize there have been no confirmatory experimental studies in humans to prove this hypothesis. In addition, these multiple malformation conditions should not be considered individual entities for the following reasons: First, there is no uniform consensus of clinical diagnostic criteria and all of them fail to capture cases with partial expression of the phenotype. Second, reports of individuals consistently show overlapping features with other reported conditions in this group. Finally, what is currently defined as VACTERL is what I would refer to as a default label when more striking features such as body wall defects, caudal dysgenesis, or cloacal exstrophy are not present.