Cargando…

Enhancing trainee clinical scientists' self‐regulated learning in the workplace

BACKGROUND: Trainee health professionals must be competent self‐regulated learners, particularly when learning in busy, unpredictable clinical settings. Whilst research indicates self‐regulated learning (SRL) is influenced both by learners' individual actions and their interactions with others,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Megan, Buckley, Sharon, Davison, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tct.13513
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Trainee health professionals must be competent self‐regulated learners, particularly when learning in busy, unpredictable clinical settings. Whilst research indicates self‐regulated learning (SRL) is influenced both by learners' individual actions and their interactions with others, how these combine to foster SRL requires further exploration. We have used Zimmerman's learner‐focused SRL model and the situative perspective of communities of practice (CoPs) to investigate how UK trainee clinical scientists regulate their learning. Our aims were to develop a holistic understanding of SRL in the clinical workplace incorporating both individual and social aspects and to suggest ways of maximising learning for trainee clinical scientists and other health professionals. METHODS: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 13 trainees on the Scientist Training Programme. Transcripts were analysed both inductively and deductively (abductively) using Zimmerman's model and CoPs to explore how trainees regulate their learning. RESULTS: Thematic analysis yielded four themes: approach to learning, engagement and execution of tasks in practice; self‐reflection and reaction; and autonomy and role construction. Themes linked concepts from Zimmerman's model and CoPs, as illustrated by our trainee–workplace congruence model. Our model suggests optimal conditions for SRL, and we highlight the importance of trainers in supporting trainee development. CONCLUSIONS: Our trainee–workplace congruence model links concepts from Zimmerman's model and CoPs to provide a framework for understanding how trainee clinical scientists regulate their learning and navigate its social aspects. Whilst trainees must take responsibility for their learning, trainers can facilitate SRL through attention to trainee‐workplace ‘fit’ and encouraging trainee participation in communities of practice.