Cargando…
Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat
This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a screening protocol to detect and isolate mcr‐positive Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from animal caecal content and meat samples. We used a multicentre approach involving 12 laboratories from nine European countries. All participants ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lam.13717 |
_version_ | 1784804654905819136 |
---|---|
author | Perrin‐Guyomard, Agnès Granier, Sophie A. Slettemeås, Jannice Schau Anjum, Muna Randall, Luke AbuOun, Manal Pauly, Natalie Irrgang, Alexandra Hammerl, Jens Andre Kjeldgaard, Jette Sejer Hammerum, Anette Franco, Alessia Skarżyńska, Magdalena Kamińska, Ewelina Wasyl, Dariusz Dierikx, Cindy Börjesson, Stefan Geurts, Yvon Haenni, Marisa Veldman, Kees |
author_facet | Perrin‐Guyomard, Agnès Granier, Sophie A. Slettemeås, Jannice Schau Anjum, Muna Randall, Luke AbuOun, Manal Pauly, Natalie Irrgang, Alexandra Hammerl, Jens Andre Kjeldgaard, Jette Sejer Hammerum, Anette Franco, Alessia Skarżyńska, Magdalena Kamińska, Ewelina Wasyl, Dariusz Dierikx, Cindy Börjesson, Stefan Geurts, Yvon Haenni, Marisa Veldman, Kees |
author_sort | Perrin‐Guyomard, Agnès |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a screening protocol to detect and isolate mcr‐positive Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from animal caecal content and meat samples. We used a multicentre approach involving 12 laboratories from nine European countries. All participants applied the same methodology combining a multiplex PCR performed on DNA extracted from a pre‐enrichment step, followed by a selective culture step on three commercially available chromogenic agar plates. The test panel was composed of two negative samples and four samples artificially contaminated with E. coli and Salmonella spp. respectively harbouring mcr‐1 or mcr‐3 and mcr‐4 or mcr‐5 genes. PCR screening resulted in a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 83%. Sensitivity of each agar medium to detect mcr‐positive colistin‐resistant E. coli or Salmonella spp. strains was 86% for CHROMID(®) Colistin R, 75% for CHROMagar(TM) COL‐APSE and 70% for COLISTIGRAM. This combined method was effective to detect and isolate most of the E. coli or Salmonella spp. strains harbouring different mcr genes from food‐producing animals and food products and might thus be used as a harmonized protocol for the screening of mcr genes in food‐producing animals and food products in Europe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9544698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95446982022-10-14 Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat Perrin‐Guyomard, Agnès Granier, Sophie A. Slettemeås, Jannice Schau Anjum, Muna Randall, Luke AbuOun, Manal Pauly, Natalie Irrgang, Alexandra Hammerl, Jens Andre Kjeldgaard, Jette Sejer Hammerum, Anette Franco, Alessia Skarżyńska, Magdalena Kamińska, Ewelina Wasyl, Dariusz Dierikx, Cindy Börjesson, Stefan Geurts, Yvon Haenni, Marisa Veldman, Kees Lett Appl Microbiol Original Articles This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a screening protocol to detect and isolate mcr‐positive Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from animal caecal content and meat samples. We used a multicentre approach involving 12 laboratories from nine European countries. All participants applied the same methodology combining a multiplex PCR performed on DNA extracted from a pre‐enrichment step, followed by a selective culture step on three commercially available chromogenic agar plates. The test panel was composed of two negative samples and four samples artificially contaminated with E. coli and Salmonella spp. respectively harbouring mcr‐1 or mcr‐3 and mcr‐4 or mcr‐5 genes. PCR screening resulted in a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 83%. Sensitivity of each agar medium to detect mcr‐positive colistin‐resistant E. coli or Salmonella spp. strains was 86% for CHROMID(®) Colistin R, 75% for CHROMagar(TM) COL‐APSE and 70% for COLISTIGRAM. This combined method was effective to detect and isolate most of the E. coli or Salmonella spp. strains harbouring different mcr genes from food‐producing animals and food products and might thus be used as a harmonized protocol for the screening of mcr genes in food‐producing animals and food products in Europe. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-21 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9544698/ /pubmed/35388505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lam.13717 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Letters in Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Perrin‐Guyomard, Agnès Granier, Sophie A. Slettemeås, Jannice Schau Anjum, Muna Randall, Luke AbuOun, Manal Pauly, Natalie Irrgang, Alexandra Hammerl, Jens Andre Kjeldgaard, Jette Sejer Hammerum, Anette Franco, Alessia Skarżyńska, Magdalena Kamińska, Ewelina Wasyl, Dariusz Dierikx, Cindy Börjesson, Stefan Geurts, Yvon Haenni, Marisa Veldman, Kees Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
title | Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
title_full | Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
title_fullStr | Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
title_short | Multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive E. coli and Salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
title_sort | multicentre evaluation of a selective isolation protocol for detection of mcr‐positive e. coli and salmonella spp. in food‐producing animals and meat |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lam.13717 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perringuyomardagnes multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT graniersophiea multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT slettemeasjanniceschau multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT anjummuna multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT randallluke multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT abuounmanal multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT paulynatalie multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT irrgangalexandra multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT hammerljensandre multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT kjeldgaardjettesejer multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT hammerumanette multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT francoalessia multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT skarzynskamagdalena multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT kaminskaewelina multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT wasyldariusz multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT dierikxcindy multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT borjessonstefan multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT geurtsyvon multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT haennimarisa multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat AT veldmankees multicentreevaluationofaselectiveisolationprotocolfordetectionofmcrpositiveecoliandsalmonellasppinfoodproducinganimalsandmeat |