Cargando…
Two subtypes of cutaneous melanoma with distinct mutational signatures and clinico-genomic characteristics
Background: To decipher mutational signatures and their associations with biological implications in cutaneous melanomas (CMs), including those with a low ultraviolet (UV) signature. Materials and Methods: We applied non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and unsupervised clustering to the 96-class...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.987205 |
Sumario: | Background: To decipher mutational signatures and their associations with biological implications in cutaneous melanomas (CMs), including those with a low ultraviolet (UV) signature. Materials and Methods: We applied non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and unsupervised clustering to the 96-class mutational context of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (N = 466) as well as other publicly available datasets (N = 527). To explore the feasibility of mutational signature-based classification using panel sequencing data, independent panel sequencing data were analyzed. Results: NMF decomposition of the TCGA cohort and other publicly available datasets consistently found two mutational signatures: UV (SBS7a/7b dominant) and non-UV (SBS1/5 dominant) signatures. Based on mutational signatures, TCGA CMs were classified into two clusters: UV-high and UV-low. CMs belonging to the UV-low cluster showed significantly worse overall survival and landmark survival at 1-year than those in the UV-high cluster; low or high UV signature remained the most significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. The UV-low cluster showed distinct genomic and functional characteristic patterns: low mutation counts, increased proportion of triple wild-type and KIT mutations, high burden of copy number alteration, expression of genes related to keratinocyte differentiation, and low activation of tumor immunity. We verified that UV-high and UV-low clusters can be distinguished by panel sequencing. Conclusion: Our study revealed two mutational signatures of CMs that divide CMs into two clusters with distinct clinico-genomic characteristics. Our results will be helpful for the clinical application of mutational signature-based classification of CMs. |
---|