Cargando…

Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions

BACKGROUND: Depression and obesity are complex global health problems. Recent studies suggest that a genetic predisposition to obesity might be accentuated in people with depression, but these analyses are prone to bias. Here, we tested the hypothesis that depression accentuates genetic susceptibili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casanova, Francesco, O’Loughlin, Jessica, Lewis, Cathryn, Frayling, Timothy M, Wood, Andrew R, Tyrrell, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac052
_version_ 1784807328650887168
author Casanova, Francesco
O’Loughlin, Jessica
Lewis, Cathryn
Frayling, Timothy M
Wood, Andrew R
Tyrrell, Jessica
author_facet Casanova, Francesco
O’Loughlin, Jessica
Lewis, Cathryn
Frayling, Timothy M
Wood, Andrew R
Tyrrell, Jessica
author_sort Casanova, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depression and obesity are complex global health problems. Recent studies suggest that a genetic predisposition to obesity might be accentuated in people with depression, but these analyses are prone to bias. Here, we tested the hypothesis that depression accentuates genetic susceptibility to obesity and applied negative control experiments to test whether any observed interactions were real or driven by confounding and statistical biases. METHODS: We used data from up to 378 000 Europeans in UK Biobank, a 73 variant body mass index (BMI) genetic risk score, two depression measures [depression symptoms (DS), major depression (MD)] and an antidepressant usage variable available. We tested whether (i) depression and (ii) antidepressant treatment accentuated genetic susceptibility to obesity. Finally, we performed negative control experiments by sampling individuals at random so that they had BMI distributions identical to depression cases and controls. RESULTS: Depression was associated with an accentuation of an individual’s genetic risk of obesity with evidence of interactions for both DS and MD (P(interaction) = 7 × 10(–4) and 7 × 10(–5) respectively). Antidepressant usage within DS cases accentuated genetic obesity risk (P(interaction) = 9 × 10(–4)), but not for MD (P(interaction) = 0.13). Negative control experiments suggested that the observed interactions for MD (empirical-P = 0.067) may be driven by statistical biases or confounding factors but were not possible with the larger DS groups. Antidepressant usage interaction also appears to be driven by statistical artefacts (empirical-P = 0.510 using MD and 0.162 using DS). CONCLUSION: We have highlighted the importance of running negative experiments to confirm putative interactions in gene–environment studies. We provide some tentative evidence that depression accentuates an individual’s genetic susceptibility to higher BMI but demonstrated that the BMI distributions within cases and controls might drive these interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9557895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95578952022-10-14 Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions Casanova, Francesco O’Loughlin, Jessica Lewis, Cathryn Frayling, Timothy M Wood, Andrew R Tyrrell, Jessica Int J Epidemiol Mental Health BACKGROUND: Depression and obesity are complex global health problems. Recent studies suggest that a genetic predisposition to obesity might be accentuated in people with depression, but these analyses are prone to bias. Here, we tested the hypothesis that depression accentuates genetic susceptibility to obesity and applied negative control experiments to test whether any observed interactions were real or driven by confounding and statistical biases. METHODS: We used data from up to 378 000 Europeans in UK Biobank, a 73 variant body mass index (BMI) genetic risk score, two depression measures [depression symptoms (DS), major depression (MD)] and an antidepressant usage variable available. We tested whether (i) depression and (ii) antidepressant treatment accentuated genetic susceptibility to obesity. Finally, we performed negative control experiments by sampling individuals at random so that they had BMI distributions identical to depression cases and controls. RESULTS: Depression was associated with an accentuation of an individual’s genetic risk of obesity with evidence of interactions for both DS and MD (P(interaction) = 7 × 10(–4) and 7 × 10(–5) respectively). Antidepressant usage within DS cases accentuated genetic obesity risk (P(interaction) = 9 × 10(–4)), but not for MD (P(interaction) = 0.13). Negative control experiments suggested that the observed interactions for MD (empirical-P = 0.067) may be driven by statistical biases or confounding factors but were not possible with the larger DS groups. Antidepressant usage interaction also appears to be driven by statistical artefacts (empirical-P = 0.510 using MD and 0.162 using DS). CONCLUSION: We have highlighted the importance of running negative experiments to confirm putative interactions in gene–environment studies. We provide some tentative evidence that depression accentuates an individual’s genetic susceptibility to higher BMI but demonstrated that the BMI distributions within cases and controls might drive these interactions. Oxford University Press 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9557895/ /pubmed/35388897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac052 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Casanova, Francesco
O’Loughlin, Jessica
Lewis, Cathryn
Frayling, Timothy M
Wood, Andrew R
Tyrrell, Jessica
Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
title Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
title_full Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
title_fullStr Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
title_full_unstemmed Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
title_short Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
title_sort simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression–body mass index genetic risk score interactions
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac052
work_keys_str_mv AT casanovafrancesco simulateddistributionsfromnegativeexperimentshighlighttheimportanceofthebodymassindexdistributioninexplainingdepressionbodymassindexgeneticriskscoreinteractions
AT oloughlinjessica simulateddistributionsfromnegativeexperimentshighlighttheimportanceofthebodymassindexdistributioninexplainingdepressionbodymassindexgeneticriskscoreinteractions
AT lewiscathryn simulateddistributionsfromnegativeexperimentshighlighttheimportanceofthebodymassindexdistributioninexplainingdepressionbodymassindexgeneticriskscoreinteractions
AT fraylingtimothym simulateddistributionsfromnegativeexperimentshighlighttheimportanceofthebodymassindexdistributioninexplainingdepressionbodymassindexgeneticriskscoreinteractions
AT woodandrewr simulateddistributionsfromnegativeexperimentshighlighttheimportanceofthebodymassindexdistributioninexplainingdepressionbodymassindexgeneticriskscoreinteractions
AT tyrrelljessica simulateddistributionsfromnegativeexperimentshighlighttheimportanceofthebodymassindexdistributioninexplainingdepressionbodymassindexgeneticriskscoreinteractions