Cargando…
Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review
Quality in education is one of the 17 goals in the United Nations’ sustainable agenda for 2030, presupposing careful planning and assessment of learning. Traditional planning in sports education (either in training or school settings) largely adopts pre-determined learning sequences and temporal mil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912068 |
_version_ | 1784808632051826688 |
---|---|
author | Loureiro, Manuel Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Ramos, Ana Coutinho, Patrícia Ribeiro, João Clemente, Filipe Manuel Mesquita, Isabel Afonso, José |
author_facet | Loureiro, Manuel Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Ramos, Ana Coutinho, Patrícia Ribeiro, João Clemente, Filipe Manuel Mesquita, Isabel Afonso, José |
author_sort | Loureiro, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality in education is one of the 17 goals in the United Nations’ sustainable agenda for 2030, presupposing careful planning and assessment of learning. Traditional planning in sports education (either in training or school settings) largely adopts pre-determined learning sequences and temporal milestones that, in theory, enhance the learning process. However, learning is a context-dependent, non-linear process with considerable intra- and interindividual variability, whereby planning and assessment should also be non-linear. In this narrative review, the main findings suggest that the specific teaching or training contents and their relative (i.e., ordering or sequencing) and absolute timing (i.e., the specific time point where certain learning or adaptations are expected) should vary depending on the learners and the context. In a process-oriented perspective, this requires flexible planning and the establishment of ongoing bidirectional links between planning and assessment. In this framework, assessment should be a flexible, evolving, and daily pedagogical tool instead of a set of formal checkpoints. We further explored how planning and assessment could be linked to provide an ongoing feedback loop that respects the individuality of each learner and its context, and therefore hope this review helps bring about a change in current planning and assessment paradigms in sports education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9564391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95643912022-10-15 Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review Loureiro, Manuel Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Ramos, Ana Coutinho, Patrícia Ribeiro, João Clemente, Filipe Manuel Mesquita, Isabel Afonso, José Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Quality in education is one of the 17 goals in the United Nations’ sustainable agenda for 2030, presupposing careful planning and assessment of learning. Traditional planning in sports education (either in training or school settings) largely adopts pre-determined learning sequences and temporal milestones that, in theory, enhance the learning process. However, learning is a context-dependent, non-linear process with considerable intra- and interindividual variability, whereby planning and assessment should also be non-linear. In this narrative review, the main findings suggest that the specific teaching or training contents and their relative (i.e., ordering or sequencing) and absolute timing (i.e., the specific time point where certain learning or adaptations are expected) should vary depending on the learners and the context. In a process-oriented perspective, this requires flexible planning and the establishment of ongoing bidirectional links between planning and assessment. In this framework, assessment should be a flexible, evolving, and daily pedagogical tool instead of a set of formal checkpoints. We further explored how planning and assessment could be linked to provide an ongoing feedback loop that respects the individuality of each learner and its context, and therefore hope this review helps bring about a change in current planning and assessment paradigms in sports education. MDPI 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9564391/ /pubmed/36231369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912068 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Loureiro, Manuel Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Ramos, Ana Coutinho, Patrícia Ribeiro, João Clemente, Filipe Manuel Mesquita, Isabel Afonso, José Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review |
title | Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review |
title_full | Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review |
title_short | Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review |
title_sort | ongoing bidirectional feedback between planning and assessment in educational contexts: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9564391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36231369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loureiromanuel ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT nakamurafabioyuzo ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT ramosana ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT coutinhopatricia ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT ribeirojoao ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT clementefilipemanuel ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT mesquitaisabel ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview AT afonsojose ongoingbidirectionalfeedbackbetweenplanningandassessmentineducationalcontextsanarrativereview |