Cargando…

Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD

Interest in plant-based diets has been on the rise in recent years owing to the potential health benefits of their individual components and the notion that plant-based diets might reduce the incidence of several diseases. Egyptian dukkah and Syrian za’atar are two of the most historic and famous Mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedeek, Mohamed S., Afifi, Sherif M., Mansour, Mai K., Hassan, Mariam, Mehaya, Fathy M., Naguib, Ibrahim A., Abourehab, Mohammed A.S., Farag, Mohamed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196471
_version_ 1784810677013053440
author Sedeek, Mohamed S.
Afifi, Sherif M.
Mansour, Mai K.
Hassan, Mariam
Mehaya, Fathy M.
Naguib, Ibrahim A.
Abourehab, Mohammed A.S.
Farag, Mohamed A.
author_facet Sedeek, Mohamed S.
Afifi, Sherif M.
Mansour, Mai K.
Hassan, Mariam
Mehaya, Fathy M.
Naguib, Ibrahim A.
Abourehab, Mohammed A.S.
Farag, Mohamed A.
author_sort Sedeek, Mohamed S.
collection PubMed
description Interest in plant-based diets has been on the rise in recent years owing to the potential health benefits of their individual components and the notion that plant-based diets might reduce the incidence of several diseases. Egyptian dukkah and Syrian za’atar are two of the most historic and famous Middle Eastern herbal blends used for their anti-inflammatory, hypolipidemic, and antidiabetic effects. Headspace SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD were adopted for characterizing the aroma profile and phenolic compounds of both herbal blends, respectively. Further, vapor-phase minimum inhibitory concentration was employed for assessing each blend’s antibacterial potential, while their antioxidant potential was estimated via in vitro antioxidant assays. SPME headspace analysis indicated the abundance of ethers and monoterpene hydrocarbons, while HPLC revealed the presence of several phenolics including rosmarinic acid, ferulic acid, and rutin. Biological investigations affirmed that vapor-phase of the tested blends exhibited antibacterial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, while the antioxidant potential of the blends was investigated and expressed as Trolox (125.15 ± 5.92 to 337.26 ± 13.84 μM T eq/mg) and EDTA (18.08 ± 1.62 to 51.69 41 ± 5.33 μM EDTA eq/mg) equivalent. The presented study offers the first insight into the chemical profile and biological activities of both dukkah and za’atar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9572683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95726832022-10-17 Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD Sedeek, Mohamed S. Afifi, Sherif M. Mansour, Mai K. Hassan, Mariam Mehaya, Fathy M. Naguib, Ibrahim A. Abourehab, Mohammed A.S. Farag, Mohamed A. Molecules Article Interest in plant-based diets has been on the rise in recent years owing to the potential health benefits of their individual components and the notion that plant-based diets might reduce the incidence of several diseases. Egyptian dukkah and Syrian za’atar are two of the most historic and famous Middle Eastern herbal blends used for their anti-inflammatory, hypolipidemic, and antidiabetic effects. Headspace SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD were adopted for characterizing the aroma profile and phenolic compounds of both herbal blends, respectively. Further, vapor-phase minimum inhibitory concentration was employed for assessing each blend’s antibacterial potential, while their antioxidant potential was estimated via in vitro antioxidant assays. SPME headspace analysis indicated the abundance of ethers and monoterpene hydrocarbons, while HPLC revealed the presence of several phenolics including rosmarinic acid, ferulic acid, and rutin. Biological investigations affirmed that vapor-phase of the tested blends exhibited antibacterial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, while the antioxidant potential of the blends was investigated and expressed as Trolox (125.15 ± 5.92 to 337.26 ± 13.84 μM T eq/mg) and EDTA (18.08 ± 1.62 to 51.69 41 ± 5.33 μM EDTA eq/mg) equivalent. The presented study offers the first insight into the chemical profile and biological activities of both dukkah and za’atar. MDPI 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9572683/ /pubmed/36235006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196471 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sedeek, Mohamed S.
Afifi, Sherif M.
Mansour, Mai K.
Hassan, Mariam
Mehaya, Fathy M.
Naguib, Ibrahim A.
Abourehab, Mohammed A.S.
Farag, Mohamed A.
Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD
title Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD
title_full Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD
title_fullStr Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD
title_full_unstemmed Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD
title_short Unveiling Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compositional Differences between Dukkah and Za’atar via SPME-GCMS and HPLC-DAD
title_sort unveiling antimicrobial and antioxidant compositional differences between dukkah and za’atar via spme-gcms and hplc-dad
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36235006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196471
work_keys_str_mv AT sedeekmohameds unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT afifisherifm unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT mansourmaik unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT hassanmariam unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT mehayafathym unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT naguibibrahima unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT abourehabmohammedas unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad
AT faragmohameda unveilingantimicrobialandantioxidantcompositionaldifferencesbetweendukkahandzaatarviaspmegcmsandhplcdad