Cargando…

Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices

Most science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments inadequately evaluate teaching, which means they are not equipped to recognize or reward effective teaching. As part of a project at one institution, we observed that departmental chairs needed help recognizing the decisions t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnan, Sandhya, Gehrtz, Jessica, Lemons, Paula P., Dolan, Erin L., Brickman, Peggy, Andrews, Tessa C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198
_version_ 1784812927999541248
author Krishnan, Sandhya
Gehrtz, Jessica
Lemons, Paula P.
Dolan, Erin L.
Brickman, Peggy
Andrews, Tessa C.
author_facet Krishnan, Sandhya
Gehrtz, Jessica
Lemons, Paula P.
Dolan, Erin L.
Brickman, Peggy
Andrews, Tessa C.
author_sort Krishnan, Sandhya
collection PubMed
description Most science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments inadequately evaluate teaching, which means they are not equipped to recognize or reward effective teaching. As part of a project at one institution, we observed that departmental chairs needed help recognizing the decisions they would need to make to improve teaching evaluation practices. To meet this need, we developed the Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs), using an iterative development process. The GATEs are designed to be a planning tool that outlines concrete goals to guide reform in teaching evaluation practices in STEM departments at research-intensive institutions. The GATEs are grounded in the available scholarly literature and guided by existing reform efforts and have been vetted with STEM departmental chairs. The GATEs steer departments to draw on three voices to evaluate teaching: trained peers, students, and the instructor. This research-based resource includes three components for each voice: 1) a list of departmental target practices to serve as goals; 2) a characterization of common starting places to prompt reflection; and 3) ideas for getting started. We provide anecdotal examples of potential uses of the GATEs for reform efforts in STEM departments and as a research tool to document departmental practices at different time points.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95828162022-11-01 Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices Krishnan, Sandhya Gehrtz, Jessica Lemons, Paula P. Dolan, Erin L. Brickman, Peggy Andrews, Tessa C. CBE Life Sci Educ General Essays and Articles Most science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments inadequately evaluate teaching, which means they are not equipped to recognize or reward effective teaching. As part of a project at one institution, we observed that departmental chairs needed help recognizing the decisions they would need to make to improve teaching evaluation practices. To meet this need, we developed the Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs), using an iterative development process. The GATEs are designed to be a planning tool that outlines concrete goals to guide reform in teaching evaluation practices in STEM departments at research-intensive institutions. The GATEs are grounded in the available scholarly literature and guided by existing reform efforts and have been vetted with STEM departmental chairs. The GATEs steer departments to draw on three voices to evaluate teaching: trained peers, students, and the instructor. This research-based resource includes three components for each voice: 1) a list of departmental target practices to serve as goals; 2) a characterization of common starting places to prompt reflection; and 3) ideas for getting started. We provide anecdotal examples of potential uses of the GATEs for reform efforts in STEM departments and as a research tool to document departmental practices at different time points. American Society for Cell Biology 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9582816/ /pubmed/35759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198 Text en © 2022 S. Krishnan et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2022 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle General Essays and Articles
Krishnan, Sandhya
Gehrtz, Jessica
Lemons, Paula P.
Dolan, Erin L.
Brickman, Peggy
Andrews, Tessa C.
Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
title Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
title_full Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
title_fullStr Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
title_full_unstemmed Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
title_short Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
title_sort guides to advance teaching evaluation (gates): a resource for stem departments planning robust and equitable evaluation practices
topic General Essays and Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnansandhya guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices
AT gehrtzjessica guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices
AT lemonspaulap guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices
AT dolanerinl guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices
AT brickmanpeggy guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices
AT andrewstessac guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices