Cargando…
Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices
Most science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments inadequately evaluate teaching, which means they are not equipped to recognize or reward effective teaching. As part of a project at one institution, we observed that departmental chairs needed help recognizing the decisions t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198 |
_version_ | 1784812927999541248 |
---|---|
author | Krishnan, Sandhya Gehrtz, Jessica Lemons, Paula P. Dolan, Erin L. Brickman, Peggy Andrews, Tessa C. |
author_facet | Krishnan, Sandhya Gehrtz, Jessica Lemons, Paula P. Dolan, Erin L. Brickman, Peggy Andrews, Tessa C. |
author_sort | Krishnan, Sandhya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments inadequately evaluate teaching, which means they are not equipped to recognize or reward effective teaching. As part of a project at one institution, we observed that departmental chairs needed help recognizing the decisions they would need to make to improve teaching evaluation practices. To meet this need, we developed the Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs), using an iterative development process. The GATEs are designed to be a planning tool that outlines concrete goals to guide reform in teaching evaluation practices in STEM departments at research-intensive institutions. The GATEs are grounded in the available scholarly literature and guided by existing reform efforts and have been vetted with STEM departmental chairs. The GATEs steer departments to draw on three voices to evaluate teaching: trained peers, students, and the instructor. This research-based resource includes three components for each voice: 1) a list of departmental target practices to serve as goals; 2) a characterization of common starting places to prompt reflection; and 3) ideas for getting started. We provide anecdotal examples of potential uses of the GATEs for reform efforts in STEM departments and as a research tool to document departmental practices at different time points. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9582816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95828162022-11-01 Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices Krishnan, Sandhya Gehrtz, Jessica Lemons, Paula P. Dolan, Erin L. Brickman, Peggy Andrews, Tessa C. CBE Life Sci Educ General Essays and Articles Most science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments inadequately evaluate teaching, which means they are not equipped to recognize or reward effective teaching. As part of a project at one institution, we observed that departmental chairs needed help recognizing the decisions they would need to make to improve teaching evaluation practices. To meet this need, we developed the Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs), using an iterative development process. The GATEs are designed to be a planning tool that outlines concrete goals to guide reform in teaching evaluation practices in STEM departments at research-intensive institutions. The GATEs are grounded in the available scholarly literature and guided by existing reform efforts and have been vetted with STEM departmental chairs. The GATEs steer departments to draw on three voices to evaluate teaching: trained peers, students, and the instructor. This research-based resource includes three components for each voice: 1) a list of departmental target practices to serve as goals; 2) a characterization of common starting places to prompt reflection; and 3) ideas for getting started. We provide anecdotal examples of potential uses of the GATEs for reform efforts in STEM departments and as a research tool to document departmental practices at different time points. American Society for Cell Biology 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9582816/ /pubmed/35759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198 Text en © 2022 S. Krishnan et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2022 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | General Essays and Articles Krishnan, Sandhya Gehrtz, Jessica Lemons, Paula P. Dolan, Erin L. Brickman, Peggy Andrews, Tessa C. Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices |
title | Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices |
title_full | Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices |
title_fullStr | Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices |
title_short | Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A Resource for STEM Departments Planning Robust and Equitable Evaluation Practices |
title_sort | guides to advance teaching evaluation (gates): a resource for stem departments planning robust and equitable evaluation practices |
topic | General Essays and Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnansandhya guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices AT gehrtzjessica guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices AT lemonspaulap guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices AT dolanerinl guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices AT brickmanpeggy guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices AT andrewstessac guidestoadvanceteachingevaluationgatesaresourceforstemdepartmentsplanningrobustandequitableevaluationpractices |