Cargando…

Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia

The use of extended reality (XR) technology in education offers many advantages for transferring knowledge and practical skills training at the higher education level. As a result, many Universities over the past 5 + years have undertaken pilot programs to both develop XR content and assess how to b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kluge, Murielle G., Maltby, Steven, Kuhne, Caroline, Evans, Darrell J. R., Walker, Frederick Rohan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11364-2
_version_ 1784813229658079232
author Kluge, Murielle G.
Maltby, Steven
Kuhne, Caroline
Evans, Darrell J. R.
Walker, Frederick Rohan
author_facet Kluge, Murielle G.
Maltby, Steven
Kuhne, Caroline
Evans, Darrell J. R.
Walker, Frederick Rohan
author_sort Kluge, Murielle G.
collection PubMed
description The use of extended reality (XR) technology in education offers many advantages for transferring knowledge and practical skills training at the higher education level. As a result, many Universities over the past 5 + years have undertaken pilot programs to both develop XR content and assess how to best implement it within existing teaching and learning systems. Unfortunately, very few of these efforts have included structured evaluation or documentation. As such, limited published evidence exists to inform processes and approaches that may assist or hinder broad scale implementation. This leads many Universities to unnecessarily commit significant time and resources to testing identical or similar approaches, resulting in repeated identification of the same or similar challenges. In response to this situation, The University of Newcastle, Australia decided to systematically document the approach for selection, development and implementation of four new virtual-reality (VR) teaching applications. The current paper contains a detailed intrinsic case study, outlining the process and critical elements that shaped the selection of suitable teaching content, software development, hardware solutions and implementation. Details are provided on how decisions were made, what components were considered helpful, challenges identified, and important lessons outlined. These findings will be useful to organisations and individuals as they look to develop pathways and processes to integrate XR technology, particularly within their existing training and educational frameworks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10639-022-11364-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9584278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95842782022-10-21 Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia Kluge, Murielle G. Maltby, Steven Kuhne, Caroline Evans, Darrell J. R. Walker, Frederick Rohan Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) Article The use of extended reality (XR) technology in education offers many advantages for transferring knowledge and practical skills training at the higher education level. As a result, many Universities over the past 5 + years have undertaken pilot programs to both develop XR content and assess how to best implement it within existing teaching and learning systems. Unfortunately, very few of these efforts have included structured evaluation or documentation. As such, limited published evidence exists to inform processes and approaches that may assist or hinder broad scale implementation. This leads many Universities to unnecessarily commit significant time and resources to testing identical or similar approaches, resulting in repeated identification of the same or similar challenges. In response to this situation, The University of Newcastle, Australia decided to systematically document the approach for selection, development and implementation of four new virtual-reality (VR) teaching applications. The current paper contains a detailed intrinsic case study, outlining the process and critical elements that shaped the selection of suitable teaching content, software development, hardware solutions and implementation. Details are provided on how decisions were made, what components were considered helpful, challenges identified, and important lessons outlined. These findings will be useful to organisations and individuals as they look to develop pathways and processes to integrate XR technology, particularly within their existing training and educational frameworks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10639-022-11364-2. Springer US 2022-10-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9584278/ /pubmed/36284824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11364-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kluge, Murielle G.
Maltby, Steven
Kuhne, Caroline
Evans, Darrell J. R.
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia
title Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia
title_full Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia
title_fullStr Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia
title_full_unstemmed Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia
title_short Comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (XR) teaching applications: A case study at The University of Newcastle Australia
title_sort comparing approaches for selection, development, and deployment of extended reality (xr) teaching applications: a case study at the university of newcastle australia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11364-2
work_keys_str_mv AT klugemurielleg comparingapproachesforselectiondevelopmentanddeploymentofextendedrealityxrteachingapplicationsacasestudyattheuniversityofnewcastleaustralia
AT maltbysteven comparingapproachesforselectiondevelopmentanddeploymentofextendedrealityxrteachingapplicationsacasestudyattheuniversityofnewcastleaustralia
AT kuhnecaroline comparingapproachesforselectiondevelopmentanddeploymentofextendedrealityxrteachingapplicationsacasestudyattheuniversityofnewcastleaustralia
AT evansdarrelljr comparingapproachesforselectiondevelopmentanddeploymentofextendedrealityxrteachingapplicationsacasestudyattheuniversityofnewcastleaustralia
AT walkerfrederickrohan comparingapproachesforselectiondevelopmentanddeploymentofextendedrealityxrteachingapplicationsacasestudyattheuniversityofnewcastleaustralia