Cargando…
Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been a source of disruption, changing the face of medical education. In response to infection control measures at the University of California, San Diego, the hybrid in-person and recorded preclerkship curriculum was converted to a complete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312802 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC |
_version_ | 1784813547128094720 |
---|---|
author | Nilaad, Sedtavut D. Lin, Erica Bailey, Jacob Truong, Caitlyn Gaboyan, Samvel Mittal, Ankita Best, Brookie M. Guluma, Kama Iglewicz, Alana Lander, Lina Evans, Sean Goldberg, Charles Crotty Alexander, Laura E. |
author_facet | Nilaad, Sedtavut D. Lin, Erica Bailey, Jacob Truong, Caitlyn Gaboyan, Samvel Mittal, Ankita Best, Brookie M. Guluma, Kama Iglewicz, Alana Lander, Lina Evans, Sean Goldberg, Charles Crotty Alexander, Laura E. |
author_sort | Nilaad, Sedtavut D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been a source of disruption, changing the face of medical education. In response to infection control measures at the University of California, San Diego, the hybrid in-person and recorded preclerkship curriculum was converted to a completely virtual format. The impact of this exclusive virtual teaching platform on the quality of trainee education is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a virtual course, relative to traditional hybrid in-person and recorded teaching, and to assess the impact of supplementary educational material on knowledge acquisition. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed to assess an introductory course, held mostly in person in 2019 versus completely virtual in 2020, for first-year medical students and second-year pharmacy students at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. RESULTS: The midterm and final examination scores were similar for the hybrid and virtual courses. There was no association between the hours of recorded lectures watched and final examination scores for either course. In the 2019 in-person and recorded course, students who demonstrated consistent on-time use of practice quizzes scored statistically higher on the final examination (P = 0.0066). In the 2020 virtual course, students who downloaded quizzes regularly had statistically higher scores on the midterm examination (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The similar examination scores for the hybrid in-person and recorded and exclusively virtual courses suggest that the short-term knowledge acquired was equivalent, independent of the modality with which the content was delivered. Consistent on-time use of practice quizzes was associated with higher examination scores. Future studies are needed to assess the difference between a completely in-person versus virtual curriculum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Thoracic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95856972022-10-27 Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students Nilaad, Sedtavut D. Lin, Erica Bailey, Jacob Truong, Caitlyn Gaboyan, Samvel Mittal, Ankita Best, Brookie M. Guluma, Kama Iglewicz, Alana Lander, Lina Evans, Sean Goldberg, Charles Crotty Alexander, Laura E. ATS Sch Original Research BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been a source of disruption, changing the face of medical education. In response to infection control measures at the University of California, San Diego, the hybrid in-person and recorded preclerkship curriculum was converted to a completely virtual format. The impact of this exclusive virtual teaching platform on the quality of trainee education is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a virtual course, relative to traditional hybrid in-person and recorded teaching, and to assess the impact of supplementary educational material on knowledge acquisition. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed to assess an introductory course, held mostly in person in 2019 versus completely virtual in 2020, for first-year medical students and second-year pharmacy students at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. RESULTS: The midterm and final examination scores were similar for the hybrid and virtual courses. There was no association between the hours of recorded lectures watched and final examination scores for either course. In the 2019 in-person and recorded course, students who demonstrated consistent on-time use of practice quizzes scored statistically higher on the final examination (P = 0.0066). In the 2020 virtual course, students who downloaded quizzes regularly had statistically higher scores on the midterm examination (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The similar examination scores for the hybrid in-person and recorded and exclusively virtual courses suggest that the short-term knowledge acquired was equivalent, independent of the modality with which the content was delivered. Consistent on-time use of practice quizzes was associated with higher examination scores. Future studies are needed to assess the difference between a completely in-person versus virtual curriculum. American Thoracic Society 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9585697/ /pubmed/36312802 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC Text en Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nilaad, Sedtavut D. Lin, Erica Bailey, Jacob Truong, Caitlyn Gaboyan, Samvel Mittal, Ankita Best, Brookie M. Guluma, Kama Iglewicz, Alana Lander, Lina Evans, Sean Goldberg, Charles Crotty Alexander, Laura E. Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students |
title | Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students |
title_full | Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students |
title_fullStr | Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students |
title_short | Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students |
title_sort | learning outcomes in a live virtual versus in-person curriculum for medical and pharmacy students |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312802 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nilaadsedtavutd learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT linerica learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT baileyjacob learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT truongcaitlyn learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT gaboyansamvel learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT mittalankita learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT bestbrookiem learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT gulumakama learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT iglewiczalana learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT landerlina learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT evanssean learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT goldbergcharles learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents AT crottyalexanderlaurae learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents |