Cargando…

Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been a source of disruption, changing the face of medical education. In response to infection control measures at the University of California, San Diego, the hybrid in-person and recorded preclerkship curriculum was converted to a complete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilaad, Sedtavut D., Lin, Erica, Bailey, Jacob, Truong, Caitlyn, Gaboyan, Samvel, Mittal, Ankita, Best, Brookie M., Guluma, Kama, Iglewicz, Alana, Lander, Lina, Evans, Sean, Goldberg, Charles, Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312802
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC
_version_ 1784813547128094720
author Nilaad, Sedtavut D.
Lin, Erica
Bailey, Jacob
Truong, Caitlyn
Gaboyan, Samvel
Mittal, Ankita
Best, Brookie M.
Guluma, Kama
Iglewicz, Alana
Lander, Lina
Evans, Sean
Goldberg, Charles
Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
author_facet Nilaad, Sedtavut D.
Lin, Erica
Bailey, Jacob
Truong, Caitlyn
Gaboyan, Samvel
Mittal, Ankita
Best, Brookie M.
Guluma, Kama
Iglewicz, Alana
Lander, Lina
Evans, Sean
Goldberg, Charles
Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
author_sort Nilaad, Sedtavut D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been a source of disruption, changing the face of medical education. In response to infection control measures at the University of California, San Diego, the hybrid in-person and recorded preclerkship curriculum was converted to a completely virtual format. The impact of this exclusive virtual teaching platform on the quality of trainee education is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a virtual course, relative to traditional hybrid in-person and recorded teaching, and to assess the impact of supplementary educational material on knowledge acquisition. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed to assess an introductory course, held mostly in person in 2019 versus completely virtual in 2020, for first-year medical students and second-year pharmacy students at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. RESULTS: The midterm and final examination scores were similar for the hybrid and virtual courses. There was no association between the hours of recorded lectures watched and final examination scores for either course. In the 2019 in-person and recorded course, students who demonstrated consistent on-time use of practice quizzes scored statistically higher on the final examination (P = 0.0066). In the 2020 virtual course, students who downloaded quizzes regularly had statistically higher scores on the midterm examination (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The similar examination scores for the hybrid in-person and recorded and exclusively virtual courses suggest that the short-term knowledge acquired was equivalent, independent of the modality with which the content was delivered. Consistent on-time use of practice quizzes was associated with higher examination scores. Future studies are needed to assess the difference between a completely in-person versus virtual curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9585697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95856972022-10-27 Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students Nilaad, Sedtavut D. Lin, Erica Bailey, Jacob Truong, Caitlyn Gaboyan, Samvel Mittal, Ankita Best, Brookie M. Guluma, Kama Iglewicz, Alana Lander, Lina Evans, Sean Goldberg, Charles Crotty Alexander, Laura E. ATS Sch Original Research BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been a source of disruption, changing the face of medical education. In response to infection control measures at the University of California, San Diego, the hybrid in-person and recorded preclerkship curriculum was converted to a completely virtual format. The impact of this exclusive virtual teaching platform on the quality of trainee education is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a virtual course, relative to traditional hybrid in-person and recorded teaching, and to assess the impact of supplementary educational material on knowledge acquisition. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed to assess an introductory course, held mostly in person in 2019 versus completely virtual in 2020, for first-year medical students and second-year pharmacy students at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. RESULTS: The midterm and final examination scores were similar for the hybrid and virtual courses. There was no association between the hours of recorded lectures watched and final examination scores for either course. In the 2019 in-person and recorded course, students who demonstrated consistent on-time use of practice quizzes scored statistically higher on the final examination (P = 0.0066). In the 2020 virtual course, students who downloaded quizzes regularly had statistically higher scores on the midterm examination (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The similar examination scores for the hybrid in-person and recorded and exclusively virtual courses suggest that the short-term knowledge acquired was equivalent, independent of the modality with which the content was delivered. Consistent on-time use of practice quizzes was associated with higher examination scores. Future studies are needed to assess the difference between a completely in-person versus virtual curriculum. American Thoracic Society 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9585697/ /pubmed/36312802 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC Text en Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nilaad, Sedtavut D.
Lin, Erica
Bailey, Jacob
Truong, Caitlyn
Gaboyan, Samvel
Mittal, Ankita
Best, Brookie M.
Guluma, Kama
Iglewicz, Alana
Lander, Lina
Evans, Sean
Goldberg, Charles
Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
title Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
title_full Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
title_fullStr Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
title_full_unstemmed Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
title_short Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students
title_sort learning outcomes in a live virtual versus in-person curriculum for medical and pharmacy students
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312802
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC
work_keys_str_mv AT nilaadsedtavutd learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT linerica learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT baileyjacob learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT truongcaitlyn learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT gaboyansamvel learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT mittalankita learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT bestbrookiem learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT gulumakama learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT iglewiczalana learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT landerlina learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT evanssean learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT goldbergcharles learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents
AT crottyalexanderlaurae learningoutcomesinalivevirtualversusinpersoncurriculumformedicalandpharmacystudents