Cargando…

Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials with a factorial design may assess the effects of multiple interventions in the same population. Factorial trials are carried out under the assumption that the trial interventions have no interactions on outcomes. Here, we present a protocol for a simulation st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsen, Markus Harboe, Jensen, Aksel Karl Georg, Dankiewicz, Josef, Skrifvars, Markus B., Reinikainen, Matti, Tiainen, Marjaana, Saxena, Manoj, Aneman, Anders, Gluud, Christian, Ullén, Susann, Nielsen, Niklas, Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06796-7
_version_ 1784813936860725248
author Olsen, Markus Harboe
Jensen, Aksel Karl Georg
Dankiewicz, Josef
Skrifvars, Markus B.
Reinikainen, Matti
Tiainen, Marjaana
Saxena, Manoj
Aneman, Anders
Gluud, Christian
Ullén, Susann
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
author_facet Olsen, Markus Harboe
Jensen, Aksel Karl Georg
Dankiewicz, Josef
Skrifvars, Markus B.
Reinikainen, Matti
Tiainen, Marjaana
Saxena, Manoj
Aneman, Anders
Gluud, Christian
Ullén, Susann
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
author_sort Olsen, Markus Harboe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials with a factorial design may assess the effects of multiple interventions in the same population. Factorial trials are carried out under the assumption that the trial interventions have no interactions on outcomes. Here, we present a protocol for a simulation study investigating the consequences of different levels of interactions between the trial interventions on outcomes for the future 2×2×2 factorial designed randomised clinical Sedation, TEmperature, and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and REsuscitation (STEPCARE) trial in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: By simulating a multisite trial with 50 sites and 3278 participants, and a presumed six-month all-cause mortality of 60% in the control population, we will investigate the validity of the trial results with different levels of interaction effects on the outcome. The primary simulation outcome of the study is the risks of type-1 and type-2 errors in the simulated scenarios, i.e. at what level of interaction is the desired alpha and beta level exceeded. When keeping the overall risk of type-1 errors ≤ 5% and the risk of type-2 errors ≤ 10%, we will quantify the maximum interaction effect we can accept if the planned sample size is increased by 5% to take into account possible interaction between the trial interventions. Secondly, we will assess how interaction effects influence the minimal detectable difference we may confirm or reject to take into account 5% (small interaction effect), 10% (moderate), or 15% (large) positive interactions in simulations with no ‘true’ intervention effect (type-1 errors) and small (5%), moderate (10%), or large negative interactions (15%) in simulations with ‘true’ intervention effects (type-2 errors). Moreover, we will investigate how much the sample size must be increased to account for a small, moderate, or large interaction effects. DISCUSSION: This protocol for a simulation study will inform the design of a 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical trial of how potential interactions between the assessed interventions might affect conclusions. Protocolising this simulation study is important to ensure valid and unbiased results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06796-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9587583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95875832022-10-23 Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study Olsen, Markus Harboe Jensen, Aksel Karl Georg Dankiewicz, Josef Skrifvars, Markus B. Reinikainen, Matti Tiainen, Marjaana Saxena, Manoj Aneman, Anders Gluud, Christian Ullén, Susann Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus Christian Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials with a factorial design may assess the effects of multiple interventions in the same population. Factorial trials are carried out under the assumption that the trial interventions have no interactions on outcomes. Here, we present a protocol for a simulation study investigating the consequences of different levels of interactions between the trial interventions on outcomes for the future 2×2×2 factorial designed randomised clinical Sedation, TEmperature, and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and REsuscitation (STEPCARE) trial in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: By simulating a multisite trial with 50 sites and 3278 participants, and a presumed six-month all-cause mortality of 60% in the control population, we will investigate the validity of the trial results with different levels of interaction effects on the outcome. The primary simulation outcome of the study is the risks of type-1 and type-2 errors in the simulated scenarios, i.e. at what level of interaction is the desired alpha and beta level exceeded. When keeping the overall risk of type-1 errors ≤ 5% and the risk of type-2 errors ≤ 10%, we will quantify the maximum interaction effect we can accept if the planned sample size is increased by 5% to take into account possible interaction between the trial interventions. Secondly, we will assess how interaction effects influence the minimal detectable difference we may confirm or reject to take into account 5% (small interaction effect), 10% (moderate), or 15% (large) positive interactions in simulations with no ‘true’ intervention effect (type-1 errors) and small (5%), moderate (10%), or large negative interactions (15%) in simulations with ‘true’ intervention effects (type-2 errors). Moreover, we will investigate how much the sample size must be increased to account for a small, moderate, or large interaction effects. DISCUSSION: This protocol for a simulation study will inform the design of a 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical trial of how potential interactions between the assessed interventions might affect conclusions. Protocolising this simulation study is important to ensure valid and unbiased results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06796-7. BioMed Central 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9587583/ /pubmed/36273179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06796-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Jensen, Aksel Karl Georg
Dankiewicz, Josef
Skrifvars, Markus B.
Reinikainen, Matti
Tiainen, Marjaana
Saxena, Manoj
Aneman, Anders
Gluud, Christian
Ullén, Susann
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
title Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
title_full Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
title_fullStr Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
title_short Interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical STEPCARE trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
title_sort interactions in the 2×2×2 factorial randomised clinical stepcare trial and the potential effects on conclusions: a protocol for a simulation study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9587583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06796-7
work_keys_str_mv AT olsenmarkusharboe interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT jensenakselkarlgeorg interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT dankiewiczjosef interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT skrifvarsmarkusb interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT reinikainenmatti interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT tiainenmarjaana interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT saxenamanoj interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT anemananders interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT gluudchristian interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT ullensusann interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT nielsenniklas interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy
AT jakobsenjanuschristian interactionsinthe222factorialrandomisedclinicalstepcaretrialandthepotentialeffectsonconclusionsaprotocolforasimulationstudy