Cargando…
“Be rational!” Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices
Argumentation is a social practice that can lead to epistemic outcomes, that is, to the construction of knowledge. Recent research in collaborative learning has pointed out the significance of affective and motivational aspects, as well as the influence of socio-relational concerns, which have been...
Autores principales: | Brocos, Pablo, Jiménez-Aleixandre, María Pilar, Baker, Michael J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36304868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933062 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Emotional Tension as a Frame for Argumentation and Decision-Making: Vegetarian vs. Omnivorous Diets
por: Jiménez-Aleixandre, María Pilar, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Anti-Exceptionalism About Requirements of Epistemic Rationality
por: Field, Claire
Publicado: (2020) -
Embodied Displays of “Doing Thinking.” Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activities
por: Heller, Vivien
Publicado: (2021) -
The aims of argument : a brief guide
por: Crusius, Timothy W., 1950-
Publicado: (2003) -
Explicating the concept of epistemic rationality
por: Eder, Anna-Maria A.
Publicado: (2021)