Cargando…

Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM

Humidity sensors with comprehensive performance are of great interest for industrial and environmental applications. Most sensors, however, have to compromise on at least one characteristic such as sensitivity, response speed, and linearity. This paper reports a gravimetric humidity sensor based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Zhou, Zhang, Guodong, Wang, Xiaomin, Kong, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13101651
_version_ 1784818698072096768
author Zheng, Zhou
Zhang, Guodong
Wang, Xiaomin
Kong, Xu
author_facet Zheng, Zhou
Zhang, Guodong
Wang, Xiaomin
Kong, Xu
author_sort Zheng, Zhou
collection PubMed
description Humidity sensors with comprehensive performance are of great interest for industrial and environmental applications. Most sensors, however, have to compromise on at least one characteristic such as sensitivity, response speed, and linearity. This paper reports a gravimetric humidity sensor based on a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) with exceptional all-around performance, and presents a side-by-side comparative investigation of two types of gravimetric humidity sensors for a better understanding of their characteristics and sensing mechanisms. For these purposes, a circular CMUT and a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) with a resonance frequency of 10 MHz were designed and fabricated. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) was employed as the humidity sensing layer for its hydrophilicity and ease of film formation. The electrical properties of the sensors, including the electrical input impedances and quality factors, were characterized by a vector network analyzer. The relative humidity (RH) sensing performance of the sensors was evaluated and compared from RH levels of 11% to 97%. Both sensors exhibited good repeatability and low hysteresis. The unique microscale resonant structure of the CMUT humidity sensor contributed to a high sensitivity of 2.01 kHz/%RH, short response and recovery times of 8 s and 3 s, respectively, and excellent linearity (R(2) = 0.973), which were far superior to their QCM counterparts. The underlying mechanism was revealed and discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9608083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96080832022-10-28 Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM Zheng, Zhou Zhang, Guodong Wang, Xiaomin Kong, Xu Micromachines (Basel) Article Humidity sensors with comprehensive performance are of great interest for industrial and environmental applications. Most sensors, however, have to compromise on at least one characteristic such as sensitivity, response speed, and linearity. This paper reports a gravimetric humidity sensor based on a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) with exceptional all-around performance, and presents a side-by-side comparative investigation of two types of gravimetric humidity sensors for a better understanding of their characteristics and sensing mechanisms. For these purposes, a circular CMUT and a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) with a resonance frequency of 10 MHz were designed and fabricated. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) was employed as the humidity sensing layer for its hydrophilicity and ease of film formation. The electrical properties of the sensors, including the electrical input impedances and quality factors, were characterized by a vector network analyzer. The relative humidity (RH) sensing performance of the sensors was evaluated and compared from RH levels of 11% to 97%. Both sensors exhibited good repeatability and low hysteresis. The unique microscale resonant structure of the CMUT humidity sensor contributed to a high sensitivity of 2.01 kHz/%RH, short response and recovery times of 8 s and 3 s, respectively, and excellent linearity (R(2) = 0.973), which were far superior to their QCM counterparts. The underlying mechanism was revealed and discussed. MDPI 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9608083/ /pubmed/36296004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13101651 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zheng, Zhou
Zhang, Guodong
Wang, Xiaomin
Kong, Xu
Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM
title Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM
title_full Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM
title_short Comparative Study of Gravimetric Humidity Sensor Platforms Based on CMUT and QCM
title_sort comparative study of gravimetric humidity sensor platforms based on cmut and qcm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9608083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13101651
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengzhou comparativestudyofgravimetrichumiditysensorplatformsbasedoncmutandqcm
AT zhangguodong comparativestudyofgravimetrichumiditysensorplatformsbasedoncmutandqcm
AT wangxiaomin comparativestudyofgravimetrichumiditysensorplatformsbasedoncmutandqcm
AT kongxu comparativestudyofgravimetrichumiditysensorplatformsbasedoncmutandqcm