Cargando…
Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence
Background and objective: Non-adherence to tacrolimus commonly manifests as low drug concentrations and/or high intra-patient variability (IPV) of concentrations across multiple measurements. We aimed to compare several methods of tacrolimus IPV calculation and evaluate how well each reflects blood...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.973564 |
_version_ | 1784819106832187392 |
---|---|
author | Kostalova, Barbora Mala-Ladova, Katerina Sulkova, Sylvie Dusilova Denhaerynck, Kris De Geest, Sabina Maly, Josef |
author_facet | Kostalova, Barbora Mala-Ladova, Katerina Sulkova, Sylvie Dusilova Denhaerynck, Kris De Geest, Sabina Maly, Josef |
author_sort | Kostalova, Barbora |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objective: Non-adherence to tacrolimus commonly manifests as low drug concentrations and/or high intra-patient variability (IPV) of concentrations across multiple measurements. We aimed to compare several methods of tacrolimus IPV calculation and evaluate how well each reflects blood concentration variation due to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: This Czech single-center retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in 2019. All outpatients ≥18 years of age, ≥3 months post-transplant, and on tacrolimus-based regimens were approached. After collecting seven consecutive tacrolimus concentrations we asked participating patients to self-report adherence to immunosuppressants (BAASIS(©) scale). The IPV of tacrolimus was calculated as the medication level variability index (MLVI), the coefficient of variation (CV), the time-weighted CV, and via nonlinearly modeled dose-corrected trough levels. These patient-level variables were analyzed using regression analysis. Detected nonlinearities in the dose-response curve were controlled for by adding tacrolimus dosing and its higher-order terms as covariates, along with self-reported medication adherence levels. Results: Of 243 patients using tacrolimus, 42% (n = 102) reported medication non-adherence. Non-adherence was associated with higher CVs, higher time-weighted CVs, and lower dose-corrected nonlinearly modeled trough levels; however, it was not associated with MLVIs. All of the significant operationalizations suggested a weak association that was similar across the applied methods. Discussion and conclusion: Implementation non-adherence was reflected by higher CV or time-weighted CV and by lower blood concentrations of tacrolimus. As an additional tool for identifying patients at risk for non-adherence, simple IPV calculations incorporated into medical records should be considered in everyday clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9609782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96097822022-10-28 Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence Kostalova, Barbora Mala-Ladova, Katerina Sulkova, Sylvie Dusilova Denhaerynck, Kris De Geest, Sabina Maly, Josef Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background and objective: Non-adherence to tacrolimus commonly manifests as low drug concentrations and/or high intra-patient variability (IPV) of concentrations across multiple measurements. We aimed to compare several methods of tacrolimus IPV calculation and evaluate how well each reflects blood concentration variation due to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: This Czech single-center retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in 2019. All outpatients ≥18 years of age, ≥3 months post-transplant, and on tacrolimus-based regimens were approached. After collecting seven consecutive tacrolimus concentrations we asked participating patients to self-report adherence to immunosuppressants (BAASIS(©) scale). The IPV of tacrolimus was calculated as the medication level variability index (MLVI), the coefficient of variation (CV), the time-weighted CV, and via nonlinearly modeled dose-corrected trough levels. These patient-level variables were analyzed using regression analysis. Detected nonlinearities in the dose-response curve were controlled for by adding tacrolimus dosing and its higher-order terms as covariates, along with self-reported medication adherence levels. Results: Of 243 patients using tacrolimus, 42% (n = 102) reported medication non-adherence. Non-adherence was associated with higher CVs, higher time-weighted CVs, and lower dose-corrected nonlinearly modeled trough levels; however, it was not associated with MLVIs. All of the significant operationalizations suggested a weak association that was similar across the applied methods. Discussion and conclusion: Implementation non-adherence was reflected by higher CV or time-weighted CV and by lower blood concentrations of tacrolimus. As an additional tool for identifying patients at risk for non-adherence, simple IPV calculations incorporated into medical records should be considered in everyday clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9609782/ /pubmed/36313323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.973564 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kostalova, Mala-Ladova, Sulkova, Denhaerynck, De Geest and Maly. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Kostalova, Barbora Mala-Ladova, Katerina Sulkova, Sylvie Dusilova Denhaerynck, Kris De Geest, Sabina Maly, Josef Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
title | Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
title_full | Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
title_short | Comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
title_sort | comparison of different methods to assess tacrolimus concentration intra-patient variability as potential marker of medication non-adherence |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9609782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.973564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kostalovabarbora comparisonofdifferentmethodstoassesstacrolimusconcentrationintrapatientvariabilityaspotentialmarkerofmedicationnonadherence AT malaladovakaterina comparisonofdifferentmethodstoassesstacrolimusconcentrationintrapatientvariabilityaspotentialmarkerofmedicationnonadherence AT sulkovasylviedusilova comparisonofdifferentmethodstoassesstacrolimusconcentrationintrapatientvariabilityaspotentialmarkerofmedicationnonadherence AT denhaerynckkris comparisonofdifferentmethodstoassesstacrolimusconcentrationintrapatientvariabilityaspotentialmarkerofmedicationnonadherence AT degeestsabina comparisonofdifferentmethodstoassesstacrolimusconcentrationintrapatientvariabilityaspotentialmarkerofmedicationnonadherence AT malyjosef comparisonofdifferentmethodstoassesstacrolimusconcentrationintrapatientvariabilityaspotentialmarkerofmedicationnonadherence |