Cargando…

Evaluating a Model of Added Sugar Intake Based on Amino Acid Carbon Isotope Ratios in a Controlled Feeding Study of U.S. Adults

Previous studies suggest that amino acid carbon stable isotope ratios (CIR(AA)s) may serve as biomarkers of added sugar (AS) intake, but this has not been tested in a demographically diverse population. We conducted a 15-day feeding study of U.S. adults, recruited across sex, age, and BMI groups. Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Jessica J., Sági-Kiss, Virág, Palma-Duran, Susana A., Commins, John, Chaloux, Matthew, Barrett, Brian, Midthune, Douglas, Kipnis, Victor, Freedman, Laurence S., Tasevska, Natasha, O’Brien, Diane M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36296992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14204308
Descripción
Sumario:Previous studies suggest that amino acid carbon stable isotope ratios (CIR(AA)s) may serve as biomarkers of added sugar (AS) intake, but this has not been tested in a demographically diverse population. We conducted a 15-day feeding study of U.S. adults, recruited across sex, age, and BMI groups. Participants consumed personalized diets that resembled habitual intake, assessed using two consecutive 7-day food records. We measured serum (n = 99) CIR(AA)s collected at the end of the feeding period and determined correlations with diet. We used forward selection to model AS intake using participant characteristics and 15 CIR(AA)s. This model was internally validated using bootstrap optimism correction. Median (25th, 75th percentile) AS intake was 65.2 g/day (44.7, 81.4) and 9.5% (7.2%, 12.4%) of energy. The CIR of alanine had the highest, although modest, correlation with AS intake (r = 0.32, p = 0.001). Serum CIR(AA)s were more highly correlated with animal food intakes, especially the ratio of animal to total protein. The AS model included sex, body weight and 6 CIR(AA)s. This model had modest explanatory power (multiple R(2) = 0.38), and the optimism-corrected R(2) was lower (R(2) = 0.15). Further investigations in populations with wider ranges of AS intake are warranted.