Cargando…

Comparison of the Material Quality of Al(x)In(1−x)N (x—0–0.50) Films Deposited on Si(100) and Si(111) at Low Temperature by Reactive RF Sputtering

Al(x)In(1−x)N ternary semiconductors have attracted much interest for application in photovoltaic devices. Here, we compare the material quality of Al(x)In(1−x)N layers deposited on Si with different crystallographic orientations, (100) and (111), via radio-frequency (RF) sputtering. To modulate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Michael, Blasco, Rodrigo, Nwodo, Julian, de la Mata, María, Molina, Sergio I., Ajay, Akhil, Monroy, Eva, Valdueza-Felip, Sirona, Naranjo, Fernando B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36295439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15207373
Descripción
Sumario:Al(x)In(1−x)N ternary semiconductors have attracted much interest for application in photovoltaic devices. Here, we compare the material quality of Al(x)In(1−x)N layers deposited on Si with different crystallographic orientations, (100) and (111), via radio-frequency (RF) sputtering. To modulate their Al content, the Al RF power was varied from 0 to 225 W, whereas the In RF power and deposition temperature were fixed at 30 W and 300 °C, respectively. X-ray diffraction measurements reveal a c-axis-oriented wurtzite structure with no phase separation regardless of the Al content (x = 0–0.50), which increases with the Al power supply. The surface morphology of the Al(x)In(1−x)N layers improves with increasing Al content (the root-mean-square roughness decreases from ≈12 to 2.5 nm), and it is similar for samples grown on both Si substrates. The amorphous layer (~2.5 nm thick) found at the interface with the substrates explains the weak influence of their orientation on the properties of the Al(x)In(1−x)N films. Simultaneously grown Al(x)In(1−x)N-on-sapphire samples point to a residual n-type carrier concentration in the 10(20)–10(21) cm(−3) range. The optical band gap energy of these layers evolves from 1.75 to 2.56 eV with the increase in the Al. PL measurements of Al(x)In(1−x)N show a blue shift in the peak emission when adding the Al, as expected. We also observe an increase in the FWHM of the main peak and a decrease in the integrated emission with the Al content in room-temperature PL measurements. In general, the material quality of the Al(x)In(1-x)N films on Si is similar for both crystallographic orientations.