Cargando…

Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches

In 1996, Kim Nasmyth(1) proposed that the eukaryotic cell cycle is an alternating sequence of transitions from G(1) to S-G(2)-M and back again. These two phases correlate to high activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that trigger S-G(2)-M events and CDK antagonists that stabilize G(1) phase. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novak, Bela, Tyson, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.016
_version_ 1784820718276444160
author Novak, Bela
Tyson, John J.
author_facet Novak, Bela
Tyson, John J.
author_sort Novak, Bela
collection PubMed
description In 1996, Kim Nasmyth(1) proposed that the eukaryotic cell cycle is an alternating sequence of transitions from G(1) to S-G(2)-M and back again. These two phases correlate to high activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that trigger S-G(2)-M events and CDK antagonists that stabilize G(1) phase. We associated these “alternative phases” with the coexistence of two stable steady states of the biochemical reactions among CDKs and their antagonists.(2)(,)(3) Transitions between these steady states (G(1)-to-S and M-to-G(1)) are driven by “helper” proteins. The fact that the transitions are irreversible is guaranteed by a “latching” property of the molecular switches, as we have argued in previous publications.(4)(,)(5) Here, we show that if the latch is broken, then the biochemical reactions can swing back-and-forth across the transitions; either G(1)-S-G(1)-S … (periodic DNA replication without mitosis or cell division) or M-(G(1))-M-(G(1)) … (periodic Cdc14 release, without fully exiting mitosis). Using mathematical modeling of the molecular control circuit in budding yeast, we provide a fresh account of aberrant cell cycles in mutant strains: endoreplication in the clb1-5Δ strain(6) and periodic release and resequestration of Cdc14 (an “exit” phosphatase) in the CLB2kdΔ strain.(7)(,)(8) In our opinion, these “endocycles” are not autonomous oscillatory modules that must be entrained by the CDK oscillator(6)(,)(7) but rather inadvertent and deleterious oscillations that are normally suppressed by the CDK latching-gate mechanism.(8)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9616797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96167972022-10-31 Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches Novak, Bela Tyson, John J. Curr Biol Report In 1996, Kim Nasmyth(1) proposed that the eukaryotic cell cycle is an alternating sequence of transitions from G(1) to S-G(2)-M and back again. These two phases correlate to high activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that trigger S-G(2)-M events and CDK antagonists that stabilize G(1) phase. We associated these “alternative phases” with the coexistence of two stable steady states of the biochemical reactions among CDKs and their antagonists.(2)(,)(3) Transitions between these steady states (G(1)-to-S and M-to-G(1)) are driven by “helper” proteins. The fact that the transitions are irreversible is guaranteed by a “latching” property of the molecular switches, as we have argued in previous publications.(4)(,)(5) Here, we show that if the latch is broken, then the biochemical reactions can swing back-and-forth across the transitions; either G(1)-S-G(1)-S … (periodic DNA replication without mitosis or cell division) or M-(G(1))-M-(G(1)) … (periodic Cdc14 release, without fully exiting mitosis). Using mathematical modeling of the molecular control circuit in budding yeast, we provide a fresh account of aberrant cell cycles in mutant strains: endoreplication in the clb1-5Δ strain(6) and periodic release and resequestration of Cdc14 (an “exit” phosphatase) in the CLB2kdΔ strain.(7)(,)(8) In our opinion, these “endocycles” are not autonomous oscillatory modules that must be entrained by the CDK oscillator(6)(,)(7) but rather inadvertent and deleterious oscillations that are normally suppressed by the CDK latching-gate mechanism.(8) Cell Press 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9616797/ /pubmed/35504285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.016 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Report
Novak, Bela
Tyson, John J.
Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
title Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
title_full Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
title_fullStr Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
title_full_unstemmed Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
title_short Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
title_sort mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.016
work_keys_str_mv AT novakbela mitotickinaseoscillationgovernsthelatchingofcellcycleswitches
AT tysonjohnj mitotickinaseoscillationgovernsthelatchingofcellcycleswitches