Cargando…
Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors
Differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be attributed to tumor-intrinsic factors or environmental cues; however, these mechanisms cannot fully explain the variable ICI responses in different individuals. Here, we investigate the potential contribution of immunological hetero...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.992630 |
_version_ | 1784822241306869760 |
---|---|
author | John, Jessy Woolaver, Rachel A. Popolizio, Vince Chen, Samantha M. Y. Ge, Huaibin Krinsky, Alexandra L. Vashisht, Monika Kramer, Yonatan Chen, Zhangguo Wang, Jing H. |
author_facet | John, Jessy Woolaver, Rachel A. Popolizio, Vince Chen, Samantha M. Y. Ge, Huaibin Krinsky, Alexandra L. Vashisht, Monika Kramer, Yonatan Chen, Zhangguo Wang, Jing H. |
author_sort | John, Jessy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be attributed to tumor-intrinsic factors or environmental cues; however, these mechanisms cannot fully explain the variable ICI responses in different individuals. Here, we investigate the potential contribution of immunological heterogeneity with a focus on differences in T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire to ICI responses, which has not been defined previously. To reveal additional factors underlying heterogeneous responses to ICI, we employed a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) mouse model in which tumor-bearing recipients unambiguously diverged into responders (R) or non-responders (NR) upon anti-PD-L1 treatment. Treatment efficacy absolutely required CD8 T-cells and correlated positively with effector functions of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). We showed that TCR repertoires exhibited a similar magnitude of clonal expansion in R vs. NR CD8 TILs. However, the top expanded TCR clonotypes appeared to be mutually exclusive between R and NR CD8 TILs, which also occurred in a recipient-specific manner, demonstrating preferential expansion of distinct TCR clonotypes against the same SCC tumor. Unexpectedly, R vs. NR CD8 TILs reached all activation clusters and did not exhibit substantial global differences in transcriptomes. By linking single-cell transcriptomic data with unique TCR clonotypes, CD8 TILs harboring top TCR clonotypes were found to occupy distinct activation clusters and upregulate genes favoring anti-tumor immunity to different extents in R vs. NR. We conclude that stochastic differences in CD8 TIL TCR repertoire and distinct activation states of top TCR clonotypes may contribute to differential anti-PD-L1 responses. Our study suggests that host-intrinsic immunological heterogeneity may offer a new explanation for differential ICI responses in different individuals, which could impact on strategies for personalized cancer immunotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9624473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96244732022-11-02 Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors John, Jessy Woolaver, Rachel A. Popolizio, Vince Chen, Samantha M. Y. Ge, Huaibin Krinsky, Alexandra L. Vashisht, Monika Kramer, Yonatan Chen, Zhangguo Wang, Jing H. Front Immunol Immunology Differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may be attributed to tumor-intrinsic factors or environmental cues; however, these mechanisms cannot fully explain the variable ICI responses in different individuals. Here, we investigate the potential contribution of immunological heterogeneity with a focus on differences in T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire to ICI responses, which has not been defined previously. To reveal additional factors underlying heterogeneous responses to ICI, we employed a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) mouse model in which tumor-bearing recipients unambiguously diverged into responders (R) or non-responders (NR) upon anti-PD-L1 treatment. Treatment efficacy absolutely required CD8 T-cells and correlated positively with effector functions of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). We showed that TCR repertoires exhibited a similar magnitude of clonal expansion in R vs. NR CD8 TILs. However, the top expanded TCR clonotypes appeared to be mutually exclusive between R and NR CD8 TILs, which also occurred in a recipient-specific manner, demonstrating preferential expansion of distinct TCR clonotypes against the same SCC tumor. Unexpectedly, R vs. NR CD8 TILs reached all activation clusters and did not exhibit substantial global differences in transcriptomes. By linking single-cell transcriptomic data with unique TCR clonotypes, CD8 TILs harboring top TCR clonotypes were found to occupy distinct activation clusters and upregulate genes favoring anti-tumor immunity to different extents in R vs. NR. We conclude that stochastic differences in CD8 TIL TCR repertoire and distinct activation states of top TCR clonotypes may contribute to differential anti-PD-L1 responses. Our study suggests that host-intrinsic immunological heterogeneity may offer a new explanation for differential ICI responses in different individuals, which could impact on strategies for personalized cancer immunotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9624473/ /pubmed/36330507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.992630 Text en Copyright © 2022 John, Woolaver, Popolizio, Chen, Ge, Krinsky, Vashisht, Kramer, Chen and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology John, Jessy Woolaver, Rachel A. Popolizio, Vince Chen, Samantha M. Y. Ge, Huaibin Krinsky, Alexandra L. Vashisht, Monika Kramer, Yonatan Chen, Zhangguo Wang, Jing H. Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
title | Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
title_full | Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
title_fullStr | Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
title_short | Divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in TCR repertoire and distinct T cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
title_sort | divergent outcomes of anti-pd-l1 treatment coupled with host-intrinsic differences in tcr repertoire and distinct t cell activation states in responding versus non-responding tumors |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.992630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnjessy divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT woolaverrachela divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT popoliziovince divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT chensamanthamy divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT gehuaibin divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT krinskyalexandral divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT vashishtmonika divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT krameryonatan divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT chenzhangguo divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors AT wangjingh divergentoutcomesofantipdl1treatmentcoupledwithhostintrinsicdifferencesintcrrepertoireanddistincttcellactivationstatesinrespondingversusnonrespondingtumors |