Cargando…

Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Early childhood care and education providers provide instruction to diverse learners, including children with developmental delays, but often lack training in the use of evidence-based instructional strategies to support children’s meaningful learning engagement. This preliminary study examined effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfeiffer, Danika L., Landa, Rebecca J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01410-6
_version_ 1784825376740999168
author Pfeiffer, Danika L.
Landa, Rebecca J.
author_facet Pfeiffer, Danika L.
Landa, Rebecca J.
author_sort Pfeiffer, Danika L.
collection PubMed
description Early childhood care and education providers provide instruction to diverse learners, including children with developmental delays, but often lack training in the use of evidence-based instructional strategies to support children’s meaningful learning engagement. This preliminary study examined effects of the Early Achievements for Child Care Providers professional development program with and without generalization training on center-based child care providers (N = 12). Outcomes assessed included providers’ implementation fidelity, knowledge, and self-efficacy as well as children’s (N = 43) social-communication skills and engagement in shared book reading. Results demonstrated that providers trained in a generalization context made larger gains in implementation fidelity in a generalization context; no other significant between-group differences were found for providers. Children in both groups made comparable, significant gains. Findings suggest that explicit generalization training is needed for providers to achieve fidelity when transferring newly learned evidence-based practices to additional classroom instructional contexts, but a brief interval of implementation likely is insufficient to differentially benefit child outcomes. Researchers should elicit providers’ perceptions when designing professional development programs to maximize feasibility of investing additional time and resources for generalization training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9638305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96383052022-11-07 Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Pfeiffer, Danika L. Landa, Rebecca J. Early Child Educ J Article Early childhood care and education providers provide instruction to diverse learners, including children with developmental delays, but often lack training in the use of evidence-based instructional strategies to support children’s meaningful learning engagement. This preliminary study examined effects of the Early Achievements for Child Care Providers professional development program with and without generalization training on center-based child care providers (N = 12). Outcomes assessed included providers’ implementation fidelity, knowledge, and self-efficacy as well as children’s (N = 43) social-communication skills and engagement in shared book reading. Results demonstrated that providers trained in a generalization context made larger gains in implementation fidelity in a generalization context; no other significant between-group differences were found for providers. Children in both groups made comparable, significant gains. Findings suggest that explicit generalization training is needed for providers to achieve fidelity when transferring newly learned evidence-based practices to additional classroom instructional contexts, but a brief interval of implementation likely is insufficient to differentially benefit child outcomes. Researchers should elicit providers’ perceptions when designing professional development programs to maximize feasibility of investing additional time and resources for generalization training. Springer Netherlands 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9638305/ /pubmed/36373063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01410-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Pfeiffer, Danika L.
Landa, Rebecca J.
Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Assessing Generalization During Professional Development in Child Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort assessing generalization during professional development in child care: a pilot randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01410-6
work_keys_str_mv AT pfeifferdanikal assessinggeneralizationduringprofessionaldevelopmentinchildcareapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT landarebeccaj assessinggeneralizationduringprofessionaldevelopmentinchildcareapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial