Cargando…
Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage
BACKGROUND: Nanopore technologies allow high-throughput sequencing of long strands of DNA at the cost of a relatively large error rate. This limits its use in the reading of amplicon libraries in which there are only a few mutations per variant and therefore they are easily confused with the sequenc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac102 |
_version_ | 1784827183554887680 |
---|---|
author | Espada, Rocío Zarevski, Nikola Dramé-Maigné, Adèle Rondelez, Yannick |
author_facet | Espada, Rocío Zarevski, Nikola Dramé-Maigné, Adèle Rondelez, Yannick |
author_sort | Espada, Rocío |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nanopore technologies allow high-throughput sequencing of long strands of DNA at the cost of a relatively large error rate. This limits its use in the reading of amplicon libraries in which there are only a few mutations per variant and therefore they are easily confused with the sequencing noise. Consensus calling strategies reduce the error but sacrifice part of the throughput on reading typically 30 to 100 times each member of the library. FINDINGS: In this work, we introduce SINGLe (SNPs In Nanopore reads of Gene Libraries), an error correction method to reduce the noise in nanopore reads of amplicons containing point variations. SINGLe exploits that in an amplicon library, all reads are very similar to a wild-type sequence from which it is possible to experimentally characterize the position-specific systematic sequencing error pattern. Then, it uses this information to reweight the confidence given to nucleotides that do not match the wild-type in individual variant reads and incorporates it on the consensus calculation. CONCLUSIONS: We tested SINGLe in a mutagenic library of the KlenTaq polymerase gene, where the true mutation rate was below the sequencing noise. We observed that contrary to other methods, SINGLe compensates for the systematic errors made by the basecallers. Consequently, SINGLe converges to the true sequence using as little as 5 reads per variant, fewer than the other available methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9646519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96465192022-11-14 Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage Espada, Rocío Zarevski, Nikola Dramé-Maigné, Adèle Rondelez, Yannick Gigascience Technical Note BACKGROUND: Nanopore technologies allow high-throughput sequencing of long strands of DNA at the cost of a relatively large error rate. This limits its use in the reading of amplicon libraries in which there are only a few mutations per variant and therefore they are easily confused with the sequencing noise. Consensus calling strategies reduce the error but sacrifice part of the throughput on reading typically 30 to 100 times each member of the library. FINDINGS: In this work, we introduce SINGLe (SNPs In Nanopore reads of Gene Libraries), an error correction method to reduce the noise in nanopore reads of amplicons containing point variations. SINGLe exploits that in an amplicon library, all reads are very similar to a wild-type sequence from which it is possible to experimentally characterize the position-specific systematic sequencing error pattern. Then, it uses this information to reweight the confidence given to nucleotides that do not match the wild-type in individual variant reads and incorporates it on the consensus calculation. CONCLUSIONS: We tested SINGLe in a mutagenic library of the KlenTaq polymerase gene, where the true mutation rate was below the sequencing noise. We observed that contrary to other methods, SINGLe compensates for the systematic errors made by the basecallers. Consequently, SINGLe converges to the true sequence using as little as 5 reads per variant, fewer than the other available methods. Oxford University Press 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9646519/ /pubmed/36352541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac102 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press GigaScience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Espada, Rocío Zarevski, Nikola Dramé-Maigné, Adèle Rondelez, Yannick Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
title | Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
title_full | Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
title_fullStr | Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
title_short | Accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
title_sort | accurate gene consensus at low nanopore coverage |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9646519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espadarocio accurategeneconsensusatlownanoporecoverage AT zarevskinikola accurategeneconsensusatlownanoporecoverage AT dramemaigneadele accurategeneconsensusatlownanoporecoverage AT rondelezyannick accurategeneconsensusatlownanoporecoverage |