Cargando…

Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A contributes to the metabolism of many approved drugs. CYP3A perpetrator drugs can profoundly alter the exposure of CYP3A substrates. However, effects of such drug-drug interactions are usually reported as maximum effects rather than studied as time-dependent proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, Yomna M., Hohmann, Nicolas, Michelet, Robin, Gottwalt, Katharina, Meid, Andreas D., Burhenne, Jürgen, Huisinga, Wilhelm, Haefeli, Walter E., Mikus, Gerd, Kloft, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01175-6
_version_ 1784828418091646976
author Nassar, Yomna M.
Hohmann, Nicolas
Michelet, Robin
Gottwalt, Katharina
Meid, Andreas D.
Burhenne, Jürgen
Huisinga, Wilhelm
Haefeli, Walter E.
Mikus, Gerd
Kloft, Charlotte
author_facet Nassar, Yomna M.
Hohmann, Nicolas
Michelet, Robin
Gottwalt, Katharina
Meid, Andreas D.
Burhenne, Jürgen
Huisinga, Wilhelm
Haefeli, Walter E.
Mikus, Gerd
Kloft, Charlotte
author_sort Nassar, Yomna M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A contributes to the metabolism of many approved drugs. CYP3A perpetrator drugs can profoundly alter the exposure of CYP3A substrates. However, effects of such drug-drug interactions are usually reported as maximum effects rather than studied as time-dependent processes. Identification of the time course of CYP3A modulation can provide insight into when significant changes to CYP3A activity occurs, help better design drug-drug interaction studies, and manage drug-drug interactions in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the time course and extent of the in vivo modulation of different CYP3A perpetrator drugs on hepatic CYP3A activity and distinguish different modulatory mechanisms by their time of onset, using pharmacologically inactive intravenous microgram doses of the CYP3A-specific substrate midazolam, as a marker of CYP3A activity. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy individuals received an intravenous midazolam bolus followed by a continuous infusion for 10 or 36 h. Individuals were randomized into four arms: within each arm, two individuals served as a placebo control and, 2 h after start of the midazolam infusion, four individuals received the CYP3A perpetrator drug: voriconazole (inhibitor, orally or intravenously), rifampicin (inducer, orally), or efavirenz (activator, orally). After midazolam bolus administration, blood samples were taken every hour (rifampicin arm) or every 15 min (remaining study arms) until the end of midazolam infusion. A total of 1858 concentrations were equally divided between midazolam and its metabolite, 1’-hydroxymidazolam. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model of both compounds was developed using NONMEM(®). CYP3A activity modulation was quantified over time, as the relative change of midazolam clearance encountered by the perpetrator drug, compared to the corresponding clearance value in the placebo arm. RESULTS: Time course of CYP3A modulation and magnitude of maximum effect were identified for each perpetrator drug. While efavirenz CYP3A activation was relatively fast and short, reaching a maximum after approximately 2–3 h, the induction effect of rifampicin could only be observed after 22 h, with a maximum after approximately 28–30 h followed by a steep drop to almost baseline within 1–2 h. In contrast, the inhibitory impact of both oral and intravenous voriconazole was prolonged with a steady inhibition of CYP3A activity followed by a gradual increase in the inhibitory effect until the end of sampling at 8 h. Relative maximum clearance changes were +59.1%, +46.7%, −70.6%, and −61.1% for efavirenz, rifampicin, oral voriconazole, and intravenous voriconazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We could distinguish between different mechanisms of CYP3A modulation by the time of onset. Identification of the time at which clearance significantly changes, per perpetrator drug, can guide the design of an optimal sampling schedule for future drug-drug interaction studies. The impact of a short-term combination of different perpetrator drugs on the paradigm CYP3A substrate midazolam was characterized and can define combination intervals in which no relevant interaction is to be expected. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities for Clinical Trials (EudraCT-No. 2013-004869-14). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-022-01175-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9652212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96522122022-11-15 Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion Nassar, Yomna M. Hohmann, Nicolas Michelet, Robin Gottwalt, Katharina Meid, Andreas D. Burhenne, Jürgen Huisinga, Wilhelm Haefeli, Walter E. Mikus, Gerd Kloft, Charlotte Clin Pharmacokinet Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A contributes to the metabolism of many approved drugs. CYP3A perpetrator drugs can profoundly alter the exposure of CYP3A substrates. However, effects of such drug-drug interactions are usually reported as maximum effects rather than studied as time-dependent processes. Identification of the time course of CYP3A modulation can provide insight into when significant changes to CYP3A activity occurs, help better design drug-drug interaction studies, and manage drug-drug interactions in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the time course and extent of the in vivo modulation of different CYP3A perpetrator drugs on hepatic CYP3A activity and distinguish different modulatory mechanisms by their time of onset, using pharmacologically inactive intravenous microgram doses of the CYP3A-specific substrate midazolam, as a marker of CYP3A activity. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy individuals received an intravenous midazolam bolus followed by a continuous infusion for 10 or 36 h. Individuals were randomized into four arms: within each arm, two individuals served as a placebo control and, 2 h after start of the midazolam infusion, four individuals received the CYP3A perpetrator drug: voriconazole (inhibitor, orally or intravenously), rifampicin (inducer, orally), or efavirenz (activator, orally). After midazolam bolus administration, blood samples were taken every hour (rifampicin arm) or every 15 min (remaining study arms) until the end of midazolam infusion. A total of 1858 concentrations were equally divided between midazolam and its metabolite, 1’-hydroxymidazolam. A nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model of both compounds was developed using NONMEM(®). CYP3A activity modulation was quantified over time, as the relative change of midazolam clearance encountered by the perpetrator drug, compared to the corresponding clearance value in the placebo arm. RESULTS: Time course of CYP3A modulation and magnitude of maximum effect were identified for each perpetrator drug. While efavirenz CYP3A activation was relatively fast and short, reaching a maximum after approximately 2–3 h, the induction effect of rifampicin could only be observed after 22 h, with a maximum after approximately 28–30 h followed by a steep drop to almost baseline within 1–2 h. In contrast, the inhibitory impact of both oral and intravenous voriconazole was prolonged with a steady inhibition of CYP3A activity followed by a gradual increase in the inhibitory effect until the end of sampling at 8 h. Relative maximum clearance changes were +59.1%, +46.7%, −70.6%, and −61.1% for efavirenz, rifampicin, oral voriconazole, and intravenous voriconazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We could distinguish between different mechanisms of CYP3A modulation by the time of onset. Identification of the time at which clearance significantly changes, per perpetrator drug, can guide the design of an optimal sampling schedule for future drug-drug interaction studies. The impact of a short-term combination of different perpetrator drugs on the paradigm CYP3A substrate midazolam was characterized and can define combination intervals in which no relevant interaction is to be expected. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities for Clinical Trials (EudraCT-No. 2013-004869-14). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-022-01175-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9652212/ /pubmed/36195807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01175-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Nassar, Yomna M.
Hohmann, Nicolas
Michelet, Robin
Gottwalt, Katharina
Meid, Andreas D.
Burhenne, Jürgen
Huisinga, Wilhelm
Haefeli, Walter E.
Mikus, Gerd
Kloft, Charlotte
Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion
title Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion
title_full Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion
title_fullStr Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion
title_short Quantification of the Time Course of CYP3A Inhibition, Activation, and Induction Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Microdosed Midazolam Continuous Infusion
title_sort quantification of the time course of cyp3a inhibition, activation, and induction using a population pharmacokinetic model of microdosed midazolam continuous infusion
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01175-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nassaryomnam quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT hohmannnicolas quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT micheletrobin quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT gottwaltkatharina quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT meidandreasd quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT burhennejurgen quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT huisingawilhelm quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT haefeliwaltere quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT mikusgerd quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion
AT kloftcharlotte quantificationofthetimecourseofcyp3ainhibitionactivationandinductionusingapopulationpharmacokineticmodelofmicrodosedmidazolamcontinuousinfusion