Cargando…
Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma
A simple sample preprocessing method was developed for the quantitative determination of amantadine (AMT) in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry cubed (LC-MS(3)). The LC-MS(3) system comprised a Shimadzu Exion LC-20AD HPLC pump coupled with a QTRAP 5500 mass spectrometer....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36364446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217619 |
_version_ | 1784829105102913536 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Qiang Cao, Haiwei Liu, Yong Li, Yanyan Huang, Jing |
author_facet | Sun, Qiang Cao, Haiwei Liu, Yong Li, Yanyan Huang, Jing |
author_sort | Sun, Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | A simple sample preprocessing method was developed for the quantitative determination of amantadine (AMT) in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry cubed (LC-MS(3)). The LC-MS(3) system comprised a Shimadzu Exion LC-20AD HPLC pump coupled with a QTRAP 5500 mass spectrometer. First, the plasma samples were pretreated using acetonitrile as the extracting solution to precipitate protein. Next, amantadine and amantadine-d(15) (AMT-d(15)) were separated on an Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 2.7 μm) using isocratic elution with solvent A (70% 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (30% acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The total run time for each sample was 3 min. The system used triple-stage fragmentation transitions at m/z 152.2→135.3→107.4 for AMT quantification in the positive ion mode and m/z 167.0→150.3→118.1 for AMT-d(15) quantification. The LC-MS(3) assay was linear (r > 0.995) with a concentration range of 50–1500 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 50 ng/mL, and the intra-day and inter-day accuracies and precisions were less than 8.0% at all concentrations. In addition, the recoveries and matrix effect for AMT in human plasma were within acceptable limits. In terms of stability, AMT had no significant degradation under all conditions. All the results met the requirements of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for biological method validation. The novelty of the MS(3) assay was that it presented a methodology with higher selectivity and sensitivity. This method was successfully applied to 44 human plasma samples, and the obtained quantitative results were compared with another liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring (LC-MRM) method. The Passing-Bablok regression coefficients and Bland-Altman plot revealed no difference between the LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM methods, implying that the developed LC-MS(3) method is a reliable and accurate assay for AMT determination in human plasma. These results are also a proof of concept for determining chemicals in biological samples by the LC-MS(3) strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9655109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96551092022-11-15 Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma Sun, Qiang Cao, Haiwei Liu, Yong Li, Yanyan Huang, Jing Molecules Article A simple sample preprocessing method was developed for the quantitative determination of amantadine (AMT) in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry cubed (LC-MS(3)). The LC-MS(3) system comprised a Shimadzu Exion LC-20AD HPLC pump coupled with a QTRAP 5500 mass spectrometer. First, the plasma samples were pretreated using acetonitrile as the extracting solution to precipitate protein. Next, amantadine and amantadine-d(15) (AMT-d(15)) were separated on an Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 2.7 μm) using isocratic elution with solvent A (70% 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (30% acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The total run time for each sample was 3 min. The system used triple-stage fragmentation transitions at m/z 152.2→135.3→107.4 for AMT quantification in the positive ion mode and m/z 167.0→150.3→118.1 for AMT-d(15) quantification. The LC-MS(3) assay was linear (r > 0.995) with a concentration range of 50–1500 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 50 ng/mL, and the intra-day and inter-day accuracies and precisions were less than 8.0% at all concentrations. In addition, the recoveries and matrix effect for AMT in human plasma were within acceptable limits. In terms of stability, AMT had no significant degradation under all conditions. All the results met the requirements of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for biological method validation. The novelty of the MS(3) assay was that it presented a methodology with higher selectivity and sensitivity. This method was successfully applied to 44 human plasma samples, and the obtained quantitative results were compared with another liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring (LC-MRM) method. The Passing-Bablok regression coefficients and Bland-Altman plot revealed no difference between the LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM methods, implying that the developed LC-MS(3) method is a reliable and accurate assay for AMT determination in human plasma. These results are also a proof of concept for determining chemicals in biological samples by the LC-MS(3) strategy. MDPI 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9655109/ /pubmed/36364446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217619 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sun, Qiang Cao, Haiwei Liu, Yong Li, Yanyan Huang, Jing Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma |
title | Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma |
title_full | Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma |
title_short | Comparison of LC-MS(3) and LC-MRM Methods for Quantifying Amantadine and Its Application in Therapeutic Amantadine Monitoring in Human Plasma |
title_sort | comparison of lc-ms(3) and lc-mrm methods for quantifying amantadine and its application in therapeutic amantadine monitoring in human plasma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9655109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36364446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunqiang comparisonoflcms3andlcmrmmethodsforquantifyingamantadineanditsapplicationintherapeuticamantadinemonitoringinhumanplasma AT caohaiwei comparisonoflcms3andlcmrmmethodsforquantifyingamantadineanditsapplicationintherapeuticamantadinemonitoringinhumanplasma AT liuyong comparisonoflcms3andlcmrmmethodsforquantifyingamantadineanditsapplicationintherapeuticamantadinemonitoringinhumanplasma AT liyanyan comparisonoflcms3andlcmrmmethodsforquantifyingamantadineanditsapplicationintherapeuticamantadinemonitoringinhumanplasma AT huangjing comparisonoflcms3andlcmrmmethodsforquantifyingamantadineanditsapplicationintherapeuticamantadinemonitoringinhumanplasma |