Cargando…

Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications

To improve the dietary habits of the population, the EU, within the Farm to Fork strategy (F2F), is strongly supporting the Nutri-Score (NS) Front Of Pack (FOP) label. Under the NS system, Geographical Indications (GIs) are generally scored as “unhealthy” food, given the predominance of products of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stiletto, Alice, Trestini, Samuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277048
_version_ 1784832532475281408
author Stiletto, Alice
Trestini, Samuele
author_facet Stiletto, Alice
Trestini, Samuele
author_sort Stiletto, Alice
collection PubMed
description To improve the dietary habits of the population, the EU, within the Farm to Fork strategy (F2F), is strongly supporting the Nutri-Score (NS) Front Of Pack (FOP) label. Under the NS system, Geographical Indications (GIs) are generally scored as “unhealthy” food, given the predominance of products of animal origin among GIs which are, notoriously, high-fat products. This study aims to determine the impact of the NS label on consumers’ preferences for two Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) cheeses, in comparison with generic ones. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted on 600 Italian consumers through the estimation of a Random Parameter Logit model. Results highlighted that Italian consumers are generally not familiar with the NS and perceive it as a positive characteristic of the product, even if it is signalling an unhealthy choice (D score). However, consumers aware of the Nutri-Score meaning are willing to pay less to buy a product considered “unhealthy” according to this system. Furthermore, we found that consumers who already knew the NS system have homogeneous behaviours in rejecting the product, independently of the association with a PDO certification. This result has important implications on the agri-food sector. If the Nutri-Score becomes mandatory in the EU, consumers might refuse many GIs due to their negative Nutri-Score values. However, the quality of these products is recognized and protected worldwide. In this vein, the GI policy could be questioned by the F2F strategy: both of them aims to reduce information asymmetry producing, at the same time, contrasting results. Within the Geographical Indication policy, the PDO and PGI goods are protected for their quality attributes, which are strictly linked to their geographical origin of the products and traditional know-how. However, the EU adoption of the Nutri-Score could damage these products, reducing their perceived quality/value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9671382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96713822022-11-18 Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications Stiletto, Alice Trestini, Samuele PLoS One Research Article To improve the dietary habits of the population, the EU, within the Farm to Fork strategy (F2F), is strongly supporting the Nutri-Score (NS) Front Of Pack (FOP) label. Under the NS system, Geographical Indications (GIs) are generally scored as “unhealthy” food, given the predominance of products of animal origin among GIs which are, notoriously, high-fat products. This study aims to determine the impact of the NS label on consumers’ preferences for two Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) cheeses, in comparison with generic ones. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted on 600 Italian consumers through the estimation of a Random Parameter Logit model. Results highlighted that Italian consumers are generally not familiar with the NS and perceive it as a positive characteristic of the product, even if it is signalling an unhealthy choice (D score). However, consumers aware of the Nutri-Score meaning are willing to pay less to buy a product considered “unhealthy” according to this system. Furthermore, we found that consumers who already knew the NS system have homogeneous behaviours in rejecting the product, independently of the association with a PDO certification. This result has important implications on the agri-food sector. If the Nutri-Score becomes mandatory in the EU, consumers might refuse many GIs due to their negative Nutri-Score values. However, the quality of these products is recognized and protected worldwide. In this vein, the GI policy could be questioned by the F2F strategy: both of them aims to reduce information asymmetry producing, at the same time, contrasting results. Within the Geographical Indication policy, the PDO and PGI goods are protected for their quality attributes, which are strictly linked to their geographical origin of the products and traditional know-how. However, the EU adoption of the Nutri-Score could damage these products, reducing their perceived quality/value. Public Library of Science 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9671382/ /pubmed/36395097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277048 Text en © 2022 Stiletto, Trestini https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stiletto, Alice
Trestini, Samuele
Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
title Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
title_full Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
title_fullStr Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
title_full_unstemmed Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
title_short Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
title_sort is it really a piece of cake to label geographical indications with the nutri-score? consumers’ behaviour and policy implications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277048
work_keys_str_mv AT stilettoalice isitreallyapieceofcaketolabelgeographicalindicationswiththenutriscoreconsumersbehaviourandpolicyimplications
AT trestinisamuele isitreallyapieceofcaketolabelgeographicalindicationswiththenutriscoreconsumersbehaviourandpolicyimplications