Cargando…
Amyloid and tau PET-positive cognitively unimpaired individuals are at high risk for future cognitive decline
A major unanswered question in the dementia field is whether cognitively unimpaired individuals who harbor both Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological hallmarks (that is, amyloid-β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles) can preserve their cognition over time or are destined to decline. In this larg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9671808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36357681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02049-x |
Sumario: | A major unanswered question in the dementia field is whether cognitively unimpaired individuals who harbor both Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological hallmarks (that is, amyloid-β plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles) can preserve their cognition over time or are destined to decline. In this large multicenter amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET) study (n = 1,325), we examined the risk for future progression to mild cognitive impairment and the rate of cognitive decline over time among cognitively unimpaired individuals who were amyloid PET-positive (A(+)) and tau PET-positive (T(+)) in the medial temporal lobe (A(+)T(MTL)(+)) and/or in the temporal neocortex (A(+)T(NEO-T)(+)) and compared them with A(+)T(−) and A(−)T(−) groups. Cox proportional-hazards models showed a substantially increased risk for progression to mild cognitive impairment in the A(+)T(NEO-T)(+) (hazard ratio (HR) = 19.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.9–33.7), A(+)T(MTL)(+) (HR = 14.6, 95% CI = 8.1–26.4) and A(+)T(−) (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4–4.3) groups versus the A(−)T(−) (reference) group. Both A(+)T(MTL)(+) (HR = 6.0, 95% CI = 3.4–10.6) and A(+)T(NEO-T)(+) (HR = 7.9, 95% CI = 4.7–13.5) groups also showed faster clinical progression to mild cognitive impairment than the A(+)T(−) group. Linear mixed-effect models indicated that the A(+)T(NEO-T)(+) (β = −0.056 ± 0.005, T = −11.55, P < 0.001), A(+)T(MTL)(+) (β = −0.024 ± 0.005, T = −4.72, P < 0.001) and A(+)T(−) (β = −0.008 ± 0.002, T = −3.46, P < 0.001) groups showed significantly faster longitudinal global cognitive decline compared to the A(−)T(−) (reference) group (all P < 0.001). Both A(+)T(NEO-T)(+) (P < 0.001) and A(+)T(MTL)(+) (P = 0.002) groups also progressed faster than the A(+)T(−) group. In summary, evidence of advanced Alzheimer’s disease pathological changes provided by a combination of abnormal amyloid and tau PET examinations is strongly associated with short-term (that is, 3–5 years) cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired individuals and is therefore of high clinical relevance. |
---|