Cargando…

Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions

BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors versus unavoidable stochastic risk factors to the variation in cancer risk among tissues have become a widely-discussed topic. Some claim that the stochastic effects of DNA replication are mainly responsible, others believe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xinhui, Yang, Jifeng, Li, Hongkai, Wang, Qing, Yu, Yuanyuan, Sun, Xiaoru, Si, Shucheng, Hou, Lei, Liu, Lu, Yang, Fan, Yan, Ran, Yu, Yifan, Fu, Zhentao, Lu, Zilong, Li, Dejin, Xue, Hao, Guo, Xiaolei, Xue, Fuzhong, Ji, Xiaokang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w
_version_ 1784833297619091456
author Liu, Xinhui
Yang, Jifeng
Li, Hongkai
Wang, Qing
Yu, Yuanyuan
Sun, Xiaoru
Si, Shucheng
Hou, Lei
Liu, Lu
Yang, Fan
Yan, Ran
Yu, Yifan
Fu, Zhentao
Lu, Zilong
Li, Dejin
Xue, Hao
Guo, Xiaolei
Xue, Fuzhong
Ji, Xiaokang
author_facet Liu, Xinhui
Yang, Jifeng
Li, Hongkai
Wang, Qing
Yu, Yuanyuan
Sun, Xiaoru
Si, Shucheng
Hou, Lei
Liu, Lu
Yang, Fan
Yan, Ran
Yu, Yifan
Fu, Zhentao
Lu, Zilong
Li, Dejin
Xue, Hao
Guo, Xiaolei
Xue, Fuzhong
Ji, Xiaokang
author_sort Liu, Xinhui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors versus unavoidable stochastic risk factors to the variation in cancer risk among tissues have become a widely-discussed topic. Some claim that the stochastic effects of DNA replication are mainly responsible, others believe that cancer risk is heavily affected by environmental and hereditary factors. Some of these studies made evidence from the correlation analysis between the lifetime number of stem cell divisions within each tissue and tissue-specific lifetime cancer risk. However, they did not consider the measurement error in the estimated number of stem cell divisions, which is caused by the exposure to different levels of genetic and environmental factors. This will obscure the authentic contribution of environmental or inherited factors. METHODS: In this study, we proposed two distinct modeling strategies, which integrate the measurement error model with the prevailing model of carcinogenesis to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of hereditary and environmental factors to cancer development. Then, we applied the proposed strategies to cancer data from 423 registries in 68 different countries (global-wide), 125 registries across China (national-wide of China), and 139 counties in Shandong province (Shandong provincial, China), respectively. RESULTS: The results suggest that the contribution of genetic and environmental factors is at least 92% to the variation in cancer risk among 17 tissues. Moreover, mutations occurring in progenitor cells and differentiated cells are less likely to be accumulated enough for cancer to occur, and the carcinogenesis is more likely to originate from stem cells. Except for medulloblastoma, the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the risk of other 16 organ-specific cancers are all more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides additional evidence that genetic and environmental factors play leading roles in cancer development. Therefore, the identification of modifiable environmental and hereditary risk factors for each cancer is highly recommended, and primary prevention in early life-course should be the major focus of cancer prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9675110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96751102022-11-20 Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions Liu, Xinhui Yang, Jifeng Li, Hongkai Wang, Qing Yu, Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoru Si, Shucheng Hou, Lei Liu, Lu Yang, Fan Yan, Ran Yu, Yifan Fu, Zhentao Lu, Zilong Li, Dejin Xue, Hao Guo, Xiaolei Xue, Fuzhong Ji, Xiaokang BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors versus unavoidable stochastic risk factors to the variation in cancer risk among tissues have become a widely-discussed topic. Some claim that the stochastic effects of DNA replication are mainly responsible, others believe that cancer risk is heavily affected by environmental and hereditary factors. Some of these studies made evidence from the correlation analysis between the lifetime number of stem cell divisions within each tissue and tissue-specific lifetime cancer risk. However, they did not consider the measurement error in the estimated number of stem cell divisions, which is caused by the exposure to different levels of genetic and environmental factors. This will obscure the authentic contribution of environmental or inherited factors. METHODS: In this study, we proposed two distinct modeling strategies, which integrate the measurement error model with the prevailing model of carcinogenesis to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of hereditary and environmental factors to cancer development. Then, we applied the proposed strategies to cancer data from 423 registries in 68 different countries (global-wide), 125 registries across China (national-wide of China), and 139 counties in Shandong province (Shandong provincial, China), respectively. RESULTS: The results suggest that the contribution of genetic and environmental factors is at least 92% to the variation in cancer risk among 17 tissues. Moreover, mutations occurring in progenitor cells and differentiated cells are less likely to be accumulated enough for cancer to occur, and the carcinogenesis is more likely to originate from stem cells. Except for medulloblastoma, the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the risk of other 16 organ-specific cancers are all more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides additional evidence that genetic and environmental factors play leading roles in cancer development. Therefore, the identification of modifiable environmental and hereditary risk factors for each cancer is highly recommended, and primary prevention in early life-course should be the major focus of cancer prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w. BioMed Central 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9675110/ /pubmed/36402971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Liu, Xinhui
Yang, Jifeng
Li, Hongkai
Wang, Qing
Yu, Yuanyuan
Sun, Xiaoru
Si, Shucheng
Hou, Lei
Liu, Lu
Yang, Fan
Yan, Ran
Yu, Yifan
Fu, Zhentao
Lu, Zilong
Li, Dejin
Xue, Hao
Guo, Xiaolei
Xue, Fuzhong
Ji, Xiaokang
Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
title Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
title_full Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
title_fullStr Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
title_short Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
title_sort quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxinhui quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT yangjifeng quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT lihongkai quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT wangqing quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT yuyuanyuan quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT sunxiaoru quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT sishucheng quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT houlei quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT liulu quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT yangfan quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT yanran quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT yuyifan quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT fuzhentao quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT luzilong quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT lidejin quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT xuehao quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT guoxiaolei quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT xuefuzhong quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions
AT jixiaokang quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions