Cargando…
Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions
BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors versus unavoidable stochastic risk factors to the variation in cancer risk among tissues have become a widely-discussed topic. Some claim that the stochastic effects of DNA replication are mainly responsible, others believe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w |
_version_ | 1784833297619091456 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xinhui Yang, Jifeng Li, Hongkai Wang, Qing Yu, Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoru Si, Shucheng Hou, Lei Liu, Lu Yang, Fan Yan, Ran Yu, Yifan Fu, Zhentao Lu, Zilong Li, Dejin Xue, Hao Guo, Xiaolei Xue, Fuzhong Ji, Xiaokang |
author_facet | Liu, Xinhui Yang, Jifeng Li, Hongkai Wang, Qing Yu, Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoru Si, Shucheng Hou, Lei Liu, Lu Yang, Fan Yan, Ran Yu, Yifan Fu, Zhentao Lu, Zilong Li, Dejin Xue, Hao Guo, Xiaolei Xue, Fuzhong Ji, Xiaokang |
author_sort | Liu, Xinhui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors versus unavoidable stochastic risk factors to the variation in cancer risk among tissues have become a widely-discussed topic. Some claim that the stochastic effects of DNA replication are mainly responsible, others believe that cancer risk is heavily affected by environmental and hereditary factors. Some of these studies made evidence from the correlation analysis between the lifetime number of stem cell divisions within each tissue and tissue-specific lifetime cancer risk. However, they did not consider the measurement error in the estimated number of stem cell divisions, which is caused by the exposure to different levels of genetic and environmental factors. This will obscure the authentic contribution of environmental or inherited factors. METHODS: In this study, we proposed two distinct modeling strategies, which integrate the measurement error model with the prevailing model of carcinogenesis to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of hereditary and environmental factors to cancer development. Then, we applied the proposed strategies to cancer data from 423 registries in 68 different countries (global-wide), 125 registries across China (national-wide of China), and 139 counties in Shandong province (Shandong provincial, China), respectively. RESULTS: The results suggest that the contribution of genetic and environmental factors is at least 92% to the variation in cancer risk among 17 tissues. Moreover, mutations occurring in progenitor cells and differentiated cells are less likely to be accumulated enough for cancer to occur, and the carcinogenesis is more likely to originate from stem cells. Except for medulloblastoma, the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the risk of other 16 organ-specific cancers are all more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides additional evidence that genetic and environmental factors play leading roles in cancer development. Therefore, the identification of modifiable environmental and hereditary risk factors for each cancer is highly recommended, and primary prevention in early life-course should be the major focus of cancer prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9675110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96751102022-11-20 Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions Liu, Xinhui Yang, Jifeng Li, Hongkai Wang, Qing Yu, Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoru Si, Shucheng Hou, Lei Liu, Lu Yang, Fan Yan, Ran Yu, Yifan Fu, Zhentao Lu, Zilong Li, Dejin Xue, Hao Guo, Xiaolei Xue, Fuzhong Ji, Xiaokang BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors versus unavoidable stochastic risk factors to the variation in cancer risk among tissues have become a widely-discussed topic. Some claim that the stochastic effects of DNA replication are mainly responsible, others believe that cancer risk is heavily affected by environmental and hereditary factors. Some of these studies made evidence from the correlation analysis between the lifetime number of stem cell divisions within each tissue and tissue-specific lifetime cancer risk. However, they did not consider the measurement error in the estimated number of stem cell divisions, which is caused by the exposure to different levels of genetic and environmental factors. This will obscure the authentic contribution of environmental or inherited factors. METHODS: In this study, we proposed two distinct modeling strategies, which integrate the measurement error model with the prevailing model of carcinogenesis to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of hereditary and environmental factors to cancer development. Then, we applied the proposed strategies to cancer data from 423 registries in 68 different countries (global-wide), 125 registries across China (national-wide of China), and 139 counties in Shandong province (Shandong provincial, China), respectively. RESULTS: The results suggest that the contribution of genetic and environmental factors is at least 92% to the variation in cancer risk among 17 tissues. Moreover, mutations occurring in progenitor cells and differentiated cells are less likely to be accumulated enough for cancer to occur, and the carcinogenesis is more likely to originate from stem cells. Except for medulloblastoma, the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the risk of other 16 organ-specific cancers are all more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides additional evidence that genetic and environmental factors play leading roles in cancer development. Therefore, the identification of modifiable environmental and hereditary risk factors for each cancer is highly recommended, and primary prevention in early life-course should be the major focus of cancer prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w. BioMed Central 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9675110/ /pubmed/36402971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Liu, Xinhui Yang, Jifeng Li, Hongkai Wang, Qing Yu, Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoru Si, Shucheng Hou, Lei Liu, Lu Yang, Fan Yan, Ran Yu, Yifan Fu, Zhentao Lu, Zilong Li, Dejin Xue, Hao Guo, Xiaolei Xue, Fuzhong Ji, Xiaokang Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
title | Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
title_full | Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
title_fullStr | Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
title_short | Quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
title_sort | quantifying substantial carcinogenesis of genetic and environmental factors from measurement error in the number of stem cell divisions |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9675110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36402971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10219-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxinhui quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT yangjifeng quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT lihongkai quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT wangqing quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT yuyuanyuan quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT sunxiaoru quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT sishucheng quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT houlei quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT liulu quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT yangfan quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT yanran quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT yuyifan quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT fuzhentao quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT luzilong quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT lidejin quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT xuehao quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT guoxiaolei quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT xuefuzhong quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions AT jixiaokang quantifyingsubstantialcarcinogenesisofgeneticandenvironmentalfactorsfrommeasurementerrorinthenumberofstemcelldivisions |